Comparative Diagnostic Yield of Contrast-Enhanced Versus Conventional Ultrasound Guidance for Coaxial Biopsy of Hepatic Lesions

December 2, 2025 updated by: Lijuan Yan, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University

Comparative Diagnostic Yield of Contrast-Enhanced Versus Conventional Ultrasound Guidance for Coaxial Biopsy of Hepatic Lesions: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

This study compared two methods used to guide needle biopsies of suspicious lumps (lesions) in the liver. A biopsy is a procedure where a small sample of tissue is taken to make a diagnosis. Doctors often use standard ultrasound (US) to see the lesion and guide the needle. Another method uses a special dye (contrast agent) injected into a vein during the ultrasound, which is called contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). The dye helps blood vessels and the lesion "light up" on the screen. The researchers wanted to find out if using CEUS leads to a more successful biopsy than using standard US alone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study compared two different methods used to guide needles during a percutaneous (through the skin) biopsy of a focal liver lesion (a suspicious mass or lump in the liver). The goal was to see if one method was better than the other at ensuring a successful and diagnostic biopsy.

The researchers looked back at the records of 330 patients who had a liver biopsy. Of these, 113 had a CEUS-guided biopsy and 217 had a standard US-guided biopsy. To ensure a fair comparison, they used a statistical method to create two perfectly matched groups of 92 patients each. The patients in these groups were very similar in terms of factors like the size and location of their liver lesion, so that the only major difference was the type of guidance used (CEUS or US).

For most patients with a liver lesion that can be seen on a standard ultrasound, this study suggests that using the more advanced and expensive CEUS method does not increase the chances of a successful biopsy. The standard ultrasound guidance is just as effective.

Therefore, the routine use of CEUS for all liver biopsies may not be necessary. This helps in managing healthcare resources wisely. However, CEUS remains a valuable tool for specific situations where a lesion is very difficult to see clearly on a standard ultrasound scan. Doctors can reserve CEUS for these more challenging cases.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

330

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fujian
      • Xiamen, Fujian, China, 361000
        • Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, China

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients underwent CEUS-guided or conventional US-guided coaxial biopsy for focal hepatic lesions.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indeterminate liver lesions on prior imaging (CT/MRI).
  • Coaxial biopsy performed with 18G introducer needle.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulopathy (INR >1.5, platelets <50×109/L).
  • Contraindications to ultrasound contrast agents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CEUS Group
CEUS-guided coaxial biopsy for hepatic lesions
CEUS-guided coaxial biopsy for hepatic lesions
US Group
US-guided coaxial biopsy for hepatic lesions
US-guided coaxial biopsy for hepatic lesions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the biopsy success rate
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the biopsy
the biopsy success rate of liver lesion
from enrollment to the end of the biopsy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
vasovagal reaction
Time Frame: during the procedure
A vasovagal reaction is a sudden drop in your heart rate and blood pressure. This reduces blood flow to your brain, which can cause you to feel dizzy, sweaty, and nauseous, and can sometimes lead to fainting.
during the procedure
bleeding
Time Frame: during the procedure
bleeding due to biopsy
during the procedure
pneumothorax
Time Frame: during the procedure
A pneumothorax (often called a collapsed lung) happens when air leaks into the space between your lung and your chest wall.
during the procedure
shock
Time Frame: during the procedure
Shock is a critical state of circulatory failure where the body's organs are starved of oxygen due to low blood flow, which can be caused by severe bleeding, heart failure, major infection, or a severe allergic reaction.
during the procedure
unplanned hospitalization
Time Frame: 48 hours after the surgery
An unplanned hospitalization is an urgent admission to a hospital, typically through the emergency department, for an unexpected and serious medical event or a sudden worsening of a pre-existing condition.
48 hours after the surgery
death
Time Frame: 48 hours after the surgery
Death is the permanent and irreversible end of all life functions in a living organism.
48 hours after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatic Lesions

Clinical Trials on CEUS or Contrast enhanced Ultrasound

Subscribe