Thermal Imaging as a Potential Diagnostic Tool of Nasal Airflow

September 15, 2018 updated by: Howard Stupak, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation

Thermal Imaging as a Potential Diagnostic Tool of Nasal Airflow. A Pilot Study.

Currently, there are no tools that can measure nasal airflow in an objective manner that is non-invasive to the patient. This clinical study aims to address this by evaluating the use of thermal imaging as a diagnostic tool for measuring nasal airflow.

Proper airflow cools the nasal airway as it passes--obstructions or narrowed airways hinder flow and results in elevated temperatures along the airway and nasal tissue. It is this elevation in temperature, or more specifically, loss of cooling, that we hypothesize to be measurable with thermal imaging. Participants in this study will be asked to perform 3-4 nasal breathing cycles which will be recorded by the thermal imager.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Currently there's no non-invasive, objective method for measuring nasal airflow. The current standard, the NOSE score is an inaccurate measure of physiology (it is subjective). There is a considerable amount of data that demonstrates that the nasopharyngeal airway is the preferred ventilatory pathway for breathing at rest and during sleep. Finding a reliable measurement modality is important in light of this. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate a novel approach to measuring nasal airflow in thermal imaging. Previous studies show that higher temperatures of the nasal mucosa are related to decreased patency. The investigators hypothesize that reduced or obstructed airflow leads to the loss of the cooling oscillatory cycle present in normal nasal respiration. The investigators believe this diminished or absent cycle may be detectable via thermal imaging due to predicted elevation of mucosal temperatures (or loss of the cooling gradient). Other methods in the past aimed at measuring temperature changes introduced error due to their invasiveness (irritation of the mucosa lead to higher baseline oscillatory cycles). This is no longer an issue as the thermal imager requires no physical contact with the patient to function.

There are several methods for measuring nasal patency that have been described throughout the literature. These include objective measurements such as acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry, as well as subjective measurements such as the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires. More recently, snap-on thermal imaging devices that take advantage of the processing power and high resolution of modern phones have surfaced leading to lower costs for highly-sensitive devices that we aim to use for measuring nasal airflow. The non-invasive nature of using thermal devices may lead to more accurate, objective measurements of nasal airflow as a previous study demonstrated that tactile irritation from other devices increase the mucosal temperature impeding measurement. (Bailey et al.). Other studies documented that improved sensation of nasal airflow is associated with cooler mucosal temperatures and that increased patency of the nasal passage is related to lower temperatures as well (and the opposite, decreased patency to increased temperatures). (Willatt et al.) We hypothesize that nasal airflow obstruction (NAO) leads to the loss of the cooling oscillatory cycle present in normal nasal respiration which we can detect via thermal imaging due to predicted elevation of mucosal temperatures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Jacobi Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy patients with no present congestion or complaints of nasal obstruction.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- All adult patients presenting to the Jacobi Medical Center otolaryngology clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of 18
  • Patients who recently used any nasal decongestants the day of measurement
  • Patients with an active infection such as sinusitis
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities such a severe septal deviation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Otolaryngology Clinic Patients
Healthy subjects with no present complaints of nasal obstructions. Patients visiting the clinic, once consented, will be asked which nostril they breathe better from. They will then be asked to perform 3-4 normal respiration cycles through their nose which will be recorded using our thermal imaging device, the Seek CompactPro thermal imager
A device with image/video recording capability, it is non-invasive and only relies on infrared emissions from heat sources (the patient).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minimum temperature in centigrade of patient's reported better (more patent) and worse (less patent) nasal airway
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
From recorded thermal imaging of nasal respiration cycles of both nostrils (nasal airways)
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area of cooling of patient's reported better (more patent) and worse (less patent) nasal airway
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
From recorded thermal imaging of nasal respiration cycles of both nostrils (nasal airways)
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Howard Stupak, MD, NYCHHC, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasal Airway Obstruction

Subscribe