Effectiveness of Perturbations Exercises in Improving Balance, Function and Mobility in Stroke Patients (perturbation)

July 26, 2017 updated by: Nawaj Pathan, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences

Effectiveness of Perturbations Exercises in Improving Balance, Function and Mobility in Stroke Patients.

Following stroke, patients loses functions of the motor, sensory and higher brain cognitive faculties to various degrees which lead to diminished balance. It has been documented that hemiplegic or hemiparetic stroke patients presented with more posture sway, asymmetric weight distribution, impaired weight-shifting ability and decreased stability capability. There are many balance exercises and strategies; to improve balance in elderly age group population, to prevent fall prevention. But we have very few evidences of giving manual perturbation balance training in stroke patients to improve speed, balance and function. Therefore this study is taken up to examine whether the manual perturbation balance training is more effective in improving speed, balance and function in stroke patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

There are many more studies done for elderly populations, normal individuals for improving balance by giving perturbation based balance training.All perturbation exercises are given by either mechanical or by self reaching tasks in forward,backward,and in both sideways. There are very studies ;who attempted perturbation based balance training to improve balance in elderly population but not for stroke patients for their Speed, Balance and Function.The manual perturbation exercise can be an promising intervention in the future for various conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maharashtra
      • Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India, 431003
        • MGM School Of Physiotherapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. First ever stroke
  2. Age ranges between 40-70
  3. Both genders were included
  4. Ambulatory patients with or without ambulatory aids
  5. Occurrence of stroke at within 0-3 months i.e.-sub acute
  6. Able to follow command
  7. Mini mental scale examinations not less than 24

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who has severe limitations in passive range of motion at lower extremities
  2. Patients with impaired sensory, proprioceptor, cognitive and perceptual ability
  3. Patient who has contracture
  4. Orthopedic or any other neurological disorder which impair balance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group
manual perturbations were given in forward, Backward,right and left sideways, 10 perturbations were given,6 days in week,in fallowing positions- sitting,kneeling, standing positions
Manual perturbations were given at waist region,over the Shoulders. in following positions- sitting, kneeling, standing positions,10 perturbations were given in forward,backward,both right and left side, 6 days in a week all precautionary measures taken for the patient's safety
Other Names:
  • Manual Perturbation
Conventional Physiotherapy treatment were given to participants included in this group for 30 mins daily for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • control Group
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Conventional Physiotherapy were given 6 days in a week, for 30 mins for 4 weeks, includes stretching, strengthening of contralateral limbs
Manual perturbations were given at waist region,over the Shoulders. in following positions- sitting, kneeling, standing positions,10 perturbations were given in forward,backward,both right and left side, 6 days in a week all precautionary measures taken for the patient's safety
Other Names:
  • Manual Perturbation
Conventional Physiotherapy treatment were given to participants included in this group for 30 mins daily for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • control Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
patients ability of balance were assessed
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Independence Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
ability of Functional independent level for Activity Of Daily Living were assessed
4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: 4 weeks
patient's speed for performing Activity Of Daily Living were assessed by this test
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nawaj Pathan, PG student, MGM School Of Physiotherapy,Aurangabad,Maharashtra, India

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Perturbation

3
Subscribe