PET-MRI in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury (CTBI) (PET-MRIcTBI)

November 28, 2023 updated by: Thomas Jefferson University

Defining Neurobiological Signatures for Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Using PET-MRI Technology

Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury (cTBI) symptoms exist in individuals who experienced previous traumatic brain injuries. There are 80-90 thousand individuals who are clinically diagnosed with cTBI, with estimated costs at greater than 60 billion dollars. However, there is a lack of studies using comprehensive diagnostic imaging tools to better understand physiological ramifications of the injury that may help guide therapy. This study uses integrative medicine approaches for persons with cTBI. Another aim of this study will be a continuation of this protocol in an effort to address the ongoing distressing physiological and psychological (anxiety and depression) symptoms associated with cTBI. After completion of the initial 3 study arms, the investigators have amended the protocol to evaluate the physiological and psychological effects and potential symptom improvement of integrative medicine approaches in cTBI patients using the Neuro Emotive Technique (NET). Participants may be re-enrolled in the NET group after completion of participation in the initial study arms. The participants in the NET substudy will be interviewed about Subjective Units of Distress (SUDS) associated with the cTBI event initially and after completion of the NET sessions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this project was to create a comprehensive, extensive, longitudinal diagnostic evaluation of cTBI patients. The evaluation uses a battery of neurocognitive tests, laboratory levels of specific inflammatory compounds, and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using Fluoro deoxyglucose (FDG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) at baseline and follow up. Participants were evaluated initially with PET, and then at approximately 3 and 6 months to determine the time course of changes within the brain associated with the integrative medicine approach. Three groups of participants were enrolled in the study: a control group, an anti-inflammatory diet group, and an N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) group; NAC is the N-acetyl derivative of the naturally occurring amino acid, L-cysteine. NAC is a common over-the-counter supplement that is also available as an injectable pharmaceutical that protects the liver in cases of acetaminophen overdose. Laboratory studies have displayed some benefits in use of NAC to reduce markers of oxidative damage, protect against cell death, and to increase glutathione in blood, which might be useful in preventing oxidative damage in cTBI patients.

Amendment:

The investigators have amended the original protocol to add a new arm. The purpose of this sub-study is to 30 enroll subjects who have physiological and/or psychological (depression and/or anxiety) symptoms associated with cTBI. Enrollment in this arm of the study would allow for re-enrollment of participants from who still have persistent anxiety, depression symptoms or distress associated with TBI after completing the first phase of this protocol (referenced above). Participants would be evaluated (or re-evaluated) with a battery of neurocognitive tests, including SUDS, NET, and biofeedback measures anxiety levels and receive baseline PET-MRI imaging and follow up functional MRI, neurocognitive tests, including SUDS, NET, and biofeedback measures.

In addition to assessing symptoms associated with TBI, subjects will receive five sessions of Neuro-emotive Technique to address ongoing mood and anxiety symptoms and is conducted by a trained practitioner with clinical credentials in mental health. Subjects who have participated in the initial study will be re-consented if enrolled in the Neuro Emotive Technique Substudy. The investigators will also enroll new subjects with TBI to be enrolled in the NET substudy cohort. In order to gain a greater understanding of the NET program to evaluate whether it reduces anxiety and affects the physiology of the brain in persons with TBI, we believe the potential benefits outweigh the risks. A prescreening interview will be conducted that inquires about current and past treatment for the TBI. In addition, a brief Subjective Units of Distress discussion will assist to determine the extent to which the subject is experiencing distress from TBI or its effects. Upon (re) enrollment and after the completion of the NET sessions. To assess the level of distress, subjects will receive a biofeedback testing evaluation that measures heart rate variability (HRV) and galvanic skin resistance (GSR) in conjunction with recollection of distress.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University, Marcus Institute of Integrative Health Centers
      • Villanova, Pennsylvania, United States, 19085
        • Thomas Jefferson University, Marcus Institute of Integrative Health Centers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with a history of TBI and complaints of persistent symptoms including cognitive impairment, emotional disturbances, headache, or other symptoms associated with TBI
  • Anxiety and/or distress associated with TBI or TBI symptoms by measurement with Subjective Units of Distress, and biofeedback screening
  • Age 18-80 years old
  • Patients had no other pre-existing history (i.e. prior to the TBI) of significant medical, neurological, or psychological disorders such as schizophrenia or active substance abuse.
  • Minor, stable health problems that should have no substantial effect on cerebral blood flow will be allowed (i.e. controlled hypertension, medication controlled diabetes)
  • Able to give informed consent and willing to complete the study
  • Patients will be allowed to be taking medications or supplements at the initial intake, but they must be on a stable dose regimen for at least 1 month
  • Women of childbearing potential will confirm a negative pregnancy test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous brain surgery.
  • Cognitive impairment with significant impact on activities of daily living and/or a score on the Mini-Mental Status examination (or similar) of 25 or lower
  • Intracranial abnormalities that may complicate interpretation of the brain scans (e.g., stroke, tumor, vascular abnormality affecting the target area).
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Enrollment in active clinical trial/ experimental therapy within the prior 30 days.
  • Any pre-existing medical conditions that may interfere with cerebral function.
  • Subject is unable or unwilling to lie still in the scanner (i.e. due to claustrophobia or weight > 350 pounds)
  • Subject has metal in their body or other reason that they cannot undergo magnetic resonance imaging.

Additional exclusionary criteria for the NAC arm:

  • Patients taking medications that might interact with the NAC involved in this study will be evaluated on a case by case basis by the PI or study physician.
  • Patients that have a history of uncontrolled conditions, e.g.: diabetes, asthma, gastroesophageal reflex disease, or thyroid conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dietary (AID) Cohort
Anti-inflammatory Diet: This arm will focus on adjusting dietary practices to eat foods that have lower amounts of inflammatory foods that might help reduce overall inflammation in the brain and body. This arm will introduce patients to an integrative diet that reduces saturated fats and carbohydrates and emphasizes proteins and omega-3 fats that help reduce inflammation and oxidative damage.
Integrative diet that reduces saturated fats and carbohydrates and emphasizes proteins and omega-3 fats that help reduce inflammation and oxidative damage.
Active Comparator: Intravenous/Oral NAC Cohort
N-acetyl Cysteine: This arm provide patients with a natural supplement, n-acetyl cysteine (NAC) which is the N-acetyl derivative of the naturally occurring amino acid, L-cysteine, that supports antioxidants to reduce oxidative damage in the body. NAC is a common over-the-counter supplement. It is used as an injectable pharmaceutical to protect the liver in cases of acetaminophen overdose. Laboratory studies have suggested that NAC might have a beneficial effect in neurodegenerative disorders such as TBI. Patients in this arm will receive IV NAC once a week plus oral NAC supplement 500 mg twice per day for approximately 3 months until the follow up evaluation.
Intravenous and Oral n-acetyl cysteine
No Intervention: Control Cohort
Control Group: Standard of Care Treatment for at least 3 months. After the first 3 month, participants in this arm may crossover to the NAC study arm.
Active Comparator: Neuro Emotive Technique
This arm measures effects of NET in individuals with TBI symptoms by evaluating measures of distress, autonomic reactivity, neuroimaging markers, anxiety, health-related, physiological and psychology-related symptoms. Participants would be evaluated (or re-evaluated) with a battery of neurocognitive tests, and receive baseline PET-MRI and follow up MRI imaging. Subjects will receive a pre-screening evaluation that measures distress by the Subjective Units of Distress interview, biofeedback measures of heart rate variability (HRV) and galvanic skin resistance (GSR) in conjunction with recollection of distress. Subjects will receive five sessions of Neuro-emotive Technique. Subjects who have participated in the initial study will be re-consented if enrolled in the Neuro Emotive Technique Substudy for approximately 2-3 months until the follow up evaluation. SUDS, biofeedback and surveys will be completed again after the NET sessions are complete.
Neuro Emotive Technique sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).
Time Frame: Baseline in all study arms.
To measure inflammation and oxidative damage in the brain.
Baseline in all study arms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This scan will be used to assess functional connectivity, tractography, and brain volume.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Speilberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire will be used as one of the psychological evaluation questionnaires for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Profile of Moods Scale (POMS).
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire will be used as one of the psychological evaluation questionnaires for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire will be used as one of the psychological evaluation questionnaires for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire will be used as one of the quality of life measures for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4.
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire will be used as one of the quality of life measures for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire will be used as one of the quality of life measures for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: Screening at Baseline, and if enrolled 90 ± 30 days and if in waitlist 180 ± 30 days
NET Substudy: This assessment is a Biofeedback evaluation to measure the physiologic level of distress experienced.
Screening at Baseline, and if enrolled 90 ± 30 days and if in waitlist 180 ± 30 days
Galvanic Skin Temperature
Time Frame: Screening at Baseline, and if enrolled 90 ± 30 days and if in waitlist 180 ± 30 days
NET Substudy: This assessment is a Biofeedback evaluation to measure the physiologic level of distress experienced.
Screening at Baseline, and if enrolled 90 ± 30 days and if in waitlist 180 ± 30 days
Subjective Units of Distress
Time Frame: Screening at Baseline, and if enrolled 90 ± 30 days and if in waitlist 180 ± 30 days
NET Substudy: This assessment is a Likert scale that identifies the level of psychological distress experienced.
Screening at Baseline, and if enrolled 90 ± 30 days and if in waitlist 180 ± 30 days
Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) color-word interference.
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire may be used as one of the cognitive testings for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Trails A & B.
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire may be used as one of the cognitive testings for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
Forward and reverse digit span.
Time Frame: Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.
This assessment questionnaire may be used as one of the cognitive testings for the study.
Baseline, 90 ± 30 days and 180 ± 30 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew B. Newberg, MD, Thomas Jefferson University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 10, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Anti-inflammatory Diet

3
Subscribe