Evaluation of the Impact of a Personalized Program of Adapted Physical Activates in Patients With Parkinson Disease (ACTIPARK)

January 23, 2020 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Our study aims to compare the effects of a standard care plan to one using adapted physical activity in patients with Parkinson Disease. Using actigraphy as an evaluation measure will allow the collection of quantitative and objective data related to activity in contrast to questionnaires which are more subjective and dependent on self-representation. In addition, the evaluation of the caregiver's actigraphy and hardship (Zarit scale) will provide interesting data from this population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • Chu Nimes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient and their carer have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be insured of the beneficiary of an insurance policy
  • The patient is available for the 6 month follow-up
  • The patient is between 40 and 80 years old
  • The patient has experienced symptoms of Parkinson Disease for at least 5 years and is in a stable state (no medical event or change of treatment in at least 1 month)
  • The functional impact and duration of fluctuations is ≥3 (MDS UPDRS)
  • The patient can walk autonomously, including using a technical aid
  • The patient does not have any regular physical activity excluding physiotherapy sessions
  • The patient has daily help from a caregiver

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject and/or their caregiver is participating in another study
  • The subject and/or their caregiver is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The patients is under judicial protection or state guardianship
  • It proves impossible to give the patient and/or the caregiver clear information
  • The patients and/or the caregiver reuses to sign the consent form
  • The patient is pregnant or breast feeding
  • The patient has anxiety or depression (Score HAD≥ 11/14), cardiac or respiratory failure (stress test), vesico-sphincter problems preventing normal practice of a physical activity, a contraindication to adapted physical activities
  • The patient cannot walk
  • Muscular tremor preventing the actigraphy measurement. Outside normal range values for UPDRS measures of: 3.15) postural tremor of the hands; 3.16) action tremor of the hands; 3.17) amplitude of rest tremor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard care
Experimental: Adapted physical activity
Targeted physical activity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the impact of an adapted physical activity (APA) program versus standard care on the activity of patients with Parkinson Disease
Time Frame: 3 months
previous weeks' activity measured by actigraphy
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity of patients in both groups
Time Frame: 6 months
previous weeks' activity measured by actigraphy
6 months
Activity of patients in both groups
Time Frame: 6 months
assessed by international physical activity questionnaire
6 months
Quality of life of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 3 months
Assessed by PDG-39 questionnaire
3 months
Quality of life of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessed by PDG-39 questionnaire
6 months
Risk of fall of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 3 months
measured by Timed Up and Go test
3 months
Risk of fall of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 6 months
measured by Timed Up and Go test
6 months
Risk of fall of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 3 months
measured by Tinetti Falls Efficacy Scale
3 months
Risk of fall of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 6 months
measured by Tinetti Falls Efficacy Scale
6 months
Risk of fall of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 3 months
measured by 0-10 scale
3 months
Risk of fall of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 6 months
measured by 0-10 scale
6 months
Endurance and speed of walking of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 3 months
6 minute walk test
3 months
Endurance and speed of walking of patients undertaking APA verses standard care
Time Frame: 6 months
6 minute walk test
6 months
Activity of the care giver
Time Frame: 3 months
previous weeks' activity measured by actigraphy
3 months
Activity of the care giver
Time Frame: 6 months
previous weeks' activity measured by actigraphy
6 months
Evaluation of the care burden of care giver
Time Frame: 3 months
Zarit scale
3 months
Evaluation of the care burden of care giver
Time Frame: 6 months
Zarit scale
6 months
Grip strength
Time Frame: Day 0
Pinch test
Day 0
Grip strength
Time Frame: 6 months
Pinch test
6 months
Patient dependence
Time Frame: Day 0
Activities of Daily Living
Day 0
Patient dependence
Time Frame: 6 months
Activities of Daily Living
6 months
Level of dementia at Day
Time Frame: Day 0
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Day 0
Level of dementia at Day
Time Frame: 6 months
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Personalized activity program

3
Subscribe