Precision-exercise-prescription for Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: The PEP Study (PEP)

June 6, 2023 updated by: University of Utah

A Phase III Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of a Personalized Exercise Program (PEP) Against No Intervention in Patients With Stage I-IIIa Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer or Secondary Lung Cancer Undergoing Surgical Resection

This is a Phase 3 study aimed at investigating the effects of a personalized exercise program (PEP) in NSCLC patients (stage I, II, IIIa) and secondary lung cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment at the University of Utah and comparing the intervention to the current standard of care (no exercise program).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 3 study aimed at investigating the effects of a personalized exercise program (PEP) in NSCLC patients (stage I, II, IIIa) and secondary lung cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment at the University of Utah and comparing the intervention to the current standard of care (no exercise program).

Eligible patients will be randomized between two arms (1:1 ratio) prior to the surgery and will be followed for approximately 6 months post-surgery:

  • An Intervention Arm (referred to in materials as Group 1) which features pre- and post-surgery PEP interventions.
  • A Control Arm (referred to in materials as Group 2) which does not include a personalized exercise program (the standard of care). Patients randomized to the Control Arm will be given the opportunity to participate in a PEP-intervention session providing exercise counseling after the 6 month assessment and will receive a free activity tracker for their participation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • Huntsman Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subject aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Diagnosis of primary lung cancer stage I, II, or IIIa OR secondary lung cancer.
  • Disease amenable to surgical resection in the opinion of the treating surgeon.
  • Patients must be able to follow directions and complete questionnaires and exercise diaries in English.
  • Patients must agree to be randomly assigned to either Intervention or Control Group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deemed ineligible for surgery by the enrolling physician
  • Abnormalities on screening physical exam judged by study physicians or supervising physical therapist to contraindicate participation in exercise program compliance.
  • Alcohol or drug abuse as judged by study physicians.
  • Significant mental or emotional problems that would interfere with study participation will be assessed by the NCCN Distress Thermometer. Any value higher than 7 will trigger further intervention, but ultimately enrollment into the clinical trial will be determined by the enrolling physician.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personalized Exercise Program

The PEP intervention involves a combination of home-based exercise as well as in-patient exercise. The exercise modes will include basic transfer and calisthenics mobility, aerobic and resistance exercises and will be performed in various postures (supine, sitting, standing and walking) with variable challenges (level walking, bending, inclines, steps and squatting).

For patients randomized to the Intervention Group (Group 1), the PEP intervention will be personalized, implemented, and modified (based on the patients AM-PAC mobility stage) by a licensed physical therapist in face-to-face, virtual, or phone meetings (~30-40 minutes). An exercise education manual, specifically developed for this study, will be used by the physical therapist to educate the patients on all aspects of starting and maintaining the exercise intervention.

No Intervention: Standard of Care - No Exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the change in mobility performance at baseline, 2 months and 6 months
Time Frame: Done at baseline, 2 and 6 months

Six Minute Walk (6MW) distance.

The distance patients can walk indoors on a 25 meters level smooth-surfaced track over the course of 6 minutes will be measured at baseline as well as at the time of discharge and at the 2 and 6 months follow-up.

Done at baseline, 2 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the change Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score
Time Frame: Done at baseline, 2 and 6 months

Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) test scores

A secondary endpoint associated with the evaluation of improvement in physical performance is the result of the short physical performance battery test. The SPPB score (ranging from 1 to 12) will be obtained for each patient at the time points described above. Medians will be obtained and compared for each arm.

Done at baseline, 2 and 6 months
Compare results from PROMIS Questionnaire done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Time Frame: Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Results from PROMIS questionnaires.
Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Compare results from FACT-L (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung) Questionnaire done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Time Frame: Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Results from FACT-L (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung) questionnaire
Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Compare results from FACIT-F (Chronic Illness Fatigue Scale) Questionnaire done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Time Frame: Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Results from FACIT-F (Chronic Illness Fatigue Scale) questionnaire.
Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Compare results from PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) Questionnaire done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Time Frame: Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Results from PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) questionnaire.
Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Compare results from BREQ-3 (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire 3) Questionnaire done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Time Frame: Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months
Results from BREQ-3 (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire 3) questionnaire.
Done at baseline, discharge (6-10 days after surgery on average), 2 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Personalized Exercise Program

3
Subscribe