- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03248583
Decision-Making Processes While Online Grocery Shopping
Individuals living with food insecurity are disproportionately affected by overweight and obesity and associated chronic health problems. There remains a lack of sustainable and scalable interventions targeting widespread barriers to access to healthy foods in this population to increase the nutritional quality of foods purchased for preparation and consumption at home.
This randomized controlled proof-of-principle trial was designed to examine the feasibility and initial efficacy of a "default option" in enhancing the nutritional quality of groceries selected via the online shopping service of a local grocery store under conditions that mimic the financial constraints typical of individuals living with food insecurity.
In behavioral economics, the "default option" refers to the option a consumer selects if no active choice is made. The notion of the default option is based on the concept of "asymmetrical" or "libertarian paternalism," which seeks to subtly shift consumer behavior in a manner that promotes welfare, but without overtly interfering with the individual's freedom to choose.
It was hypothesized that the "default" option effectively increases the nutritional quality of foods purchased online, compared to monetary incentives and psychoeducation about nutrition.
Female undergraduate students (n = 60) selected food for one week using the online shopping service of a local grocery store with a budget corresponding to maximum weekly Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Before completing the task again, participants were randomized to: (1) a small monetary "incentive" for selecting groceries that meet nutritional guidelines (n = 17), (2) an "educational" brochure (n = 24), or (3) a "default" pre-filled online shopping cart containing a nutritionally balanced selection of groceries to which they could freely make changes (n = 18).
Primary outcome measures capture the nutritional quality of groceries selected/ purchased.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 18 or older
- fluent in written and spoken English
- able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- significant dietary restrictions (i.e., meat avoidance, food allergies, religious dietary restrictions, etc.)
- likely presence of current eating disorder diagnosis (score >/= 2 on SCOFF screening measure)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Default
|
The "default option" is a behavioral economics construct that refers to the option a consumer selects if no active choice is made (e.g. opt-out 401K plans, which significantly increase enrollment, compared to active sign up). Participants in the default condition were presented with a pre-filled online shopping cart containing a combination of groceries that meet macro- and micronutrient requirements for their gender and age, and told that they are free to delete, add, and exchange any item they wish to finalize their selections. |
Active Comparator: Psychoeducation
|
Participants in the psychoeducation condition were instructed to read a brief psychoeducational brochure adapted from materials currently utilized by the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance ("Eat Smart New York").
|
Active Comparator: Incentive
|
Participants in the incentive condition were informed that they will receive a gift card to a major retailer of their choice if they select groceries that meet recommended nutritional guidelines for macro- and micronutrient requirements.
Participants were given examples of macro- and micronutrients to ensure that the instructions were clear.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Nutritional quality
Time Frame: Single laboratory visit, <1.5 hours
|
The Thrifty Food Plan Calculator (TFPC) was used to quantify the nutritional quality of groceries selected by study participants.
The TFPC was developed using U.S. Department of Agriculture nutrition and consumption data and is designed to have users input information about the relative amount of money spent on various categories of food and provides comprehensive information on caloric, macro-, and micronutrient content of the foods selected based on participant age and gender.
|
Single laboratory visit, <1.5 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16-E-005-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Nutrition Poor
-
Inter-American Development BankBusara Center for Behavioral EconomicsNot yet recruiting
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Minnesota; The University of The West IndiesCompleted
-
Société des Produits Nestlé (SPN)CompletedNutrition Poor
-
University of California, DavisCompletedPoor NutritionUnited States
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreCompletedPoor NutritionUnited States
-
University at AlbanyCompleted
-
Kemin Foods LCDSM Nutritional Products, Inc.Terminated
-
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital OaklandBattery PoweredCompletedFood Insecurity | Nutrition PoorUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamWithdrawnHealth Behavior | Nutrition Poor
Clinical Trials on Default option
-
Auburn UniversityCornell UniversityUnknownFood Selection
-
University at AlbanyUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA)CompletedObesity | Food SelectionUnited States
-
University at AlbanyCompleted
-
Geisinger ClinicCompletedSkilled Nursing Facilities | Behavioral EconomicsUnited States
-
Abbott NutritionNational Health Service, United Kingdom; Changing HealthActive, not recruitingType 2 Diabetes | Weight Change, BodyUnited Kingdom
-
Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical CenterCompletedIdiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis | COPD | Congestive Heart Failure | Malignancy | Severe or Very Severe Airflow Obstruction and/or Receiving or Eligible to Receive Long-term Oxygen Therapy | Other Interstitial Lung Disease Without Curative Therapy | NYHA Class IV or NYHA Class III Plus 1 Hospitalization... and other conditionsUnited States
-
University of WarwickCompletedChronic Disease | Hospital Outpatient ClinicsUnited Kingdom
-
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedCancerUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of PittsburghCompletedThis Study Will Focus on Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Life-limiting IllnessesUnited States