Comparison of MR Elastography Methods Without and With Compressed Sensing

In this research study, the investigators will compare the liver stiffness results obtained from the current Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) method to liver stiffness results obtained from a method that uses faster imaging techniques.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

MR elastography is increasingly used to assess liver stiffness in pediatric and adult patients with chronic liver diseases. While numerous tissue abnormalities can affect liver stiffness, liver stiffness measured by MR elastography is most often used to predict and quantify liver fibrosis. Conventional MR elastography techniques require multiple breath-holds that are 12-20 seconds in length. In the pediatric population, reliable breath-holding >10 seconds can be challenging. Recently, compressed sensing has become available as a method for accelerating image data acquisition, and thus shortening breath-holds.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy Volunteers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult volunteers ≥18 years of age
  • Ability to tolerate 30 minutes in an MRI scanner.
  • Nothing to eat or drink for 4 hours prior to the MRI scan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No contraindication to MR imaging (e.g., implanted non-MRI compatible device)
  • Known or suspected pregnancy. Female subjects of child bearing potential will undergo a urine pregnancy test prior to imaging.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus Elastography with Compressed Sensing (x1.5)
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography with 1.5 times the amount of standard Sensing applied. Correlation Coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.
30 minutes
Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus Elastography with Compressed Sensing (x2)
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography with 2 times the amount of standard sensing applied. correlation coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.
30 minutes
Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus Elastography with Compressed Sensing (x3)
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography with 3 times the amount of standard Sensing applied. Correlation coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus respiratory triggered Magnetic Resonance Elastography.
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography acquired using respiratory triggered Gradient Recalled Elastography. Correlation coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.
30 minutes
Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus navigated triggered Magnetic Resonance Elastography.
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography acquired using navigated triggered Gradient Recalled Elastography. Correlation coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIN_CompMRE_001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Elastography

Subscribe