Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Immediate Implant Placement in Thin Buccofacial Bone

September 14, 2017 updated by: Abdullah Abdou Mattar, Cairo University

Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Immediate Implant Placement in Thin Buccofacial Bone to Evaluate Buccal Bone Resorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Buccal bone is prone to resorb after tooth extraction specially with immediate tooth implantation which could compromise the esthetics of the patient. socket shield technique retains the buccal aspect of the extracted root fragment which may help in preventing the buccal bone from resorbing and prevent esthetics deterioration

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The alveolar ridge resorbs and collapses following tooth removal which continues to be a major concern for practitioners. Many researchers concluded that buccal aspect of the ridge is more prone to resorption, as it is primarily supplied by the periodontal tissues and ligments of the tooth. Therefore, extraction of the hopeless tooth, may be a reason for buccal cortical plate resorbing at a faster rate than the palatal plate leading to its total degradation. This may lead to dimensional changes in the human ridge and the aesthetic area is highly affected by this process. Several techniques in the litreture were proposed to solve the problem of thin buccal bone resorption with or without immediate implantation in the aesthetic area. Some of these techniques are the guided bone and soft tissue regenraton and bone augmentation but proved to be slight aggressive with high morbidity rate. Recently, several papers were published concerning the socket shield technique explaining how to maintain the ridge width and height. Socket shield technique that was first introduced in 2010 aids at retaining the buccal fragment of root in place and intact thus placing the implant behind the lingual aspect of that fragment so that the periodontal ligments and tissues preserve its vitality and aids in preventing the collapsing of the buccal bone. This would help in improving aesthetics especially during immediate implant placment in the anterior maxillary region.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Humans

    • Esthetic area (anterior and first premolars)
    • Intact labial plate
    • Hopeless tooth indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Implantation after trauma

    • Peri-implantits defects
    • Use of barrier membranes(GBR)
    • Socket preservation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE
Socket shield is the surgical removal of the frontal aspect of the badly broken root and retaining the lingual aspect so as to prevent crestal bone loss with insertion of the dental implant behind it
Socket shield is the Removal of the lingual portion of the anterior root thus retaining the lingual portion
Other Names:
  • Implant stability
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional immediate implantation
Conventional immediate implantation is the surgical removal of the entire badly broken root
Conventional immediate implantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Buccal bone resorption assesed by cone beam computed tomography as a measuring tool
Time Frame: 12 months
Measuring buccal bone loss after the procedure comparing between leaving the buccal portion of the root and extracting the whole root
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abdullah A Mattar, A.Lecturer, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 20, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 15, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEBD-CU-2017-08-03

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crestal Bone Loss

Clinical Trials on Socket shield

Subscribe