The Effectiveness of the Adapted Bridge's Self-management Programme

September 3, 2017 updated by: Reham Nasir, University of the Western Cape

The Effectiveness of the Adapted Bridge's Self-management Programme in South African Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The effectiveness of the adapted Bridge's self-management programme in South African community-dwelling stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial with two arms will be used, with the intervention group receiving self-management sessions delivered by experienced therapists and usual care and control group will only receive usual care which includes a information booklet.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

This study aim to determine the effectiveness of the Adapted bridges self-management intervention on South African stroke patients' functional activity, self-efficacy, and participation. Method: This experimental study will make use of a randomized controlled design (RCT), consisting of one hundred and sixty eight stroke survivors recruited from different health care facilities within the Cape Metropolitan area. The study participants will be divided randomly into two groups, with one receiving the intervention - the experimental group - and the other receiving an educational booklet - the control group. Participants will be assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention (six weeks), three and sixth-month post intervention, using standardized outcome measures (both subjective outcome measures and objective clinical tools). Ethical clearance and permission to conduct the study will be obtained and patient information will be kept confidential. Analyses will be conducted using descriptive statistics of frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. Given the assumptions of equal variance, a two-way full factorial ANOVA will be computed in order to assess interaction between groups and intervention type.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Anthea Rhoda, Professor
  • Phone Number: +27827757748
  • Email: arhoda@uwc.ac.za

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having a first ever stroke, by a physician, based on the WHO (1988) definition of stroke which is "rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24 hours or longer or leading to death, with no apparent cause other than of vascular origin"; ≥18 years of age; of sufficient cognition to participate: having a score of ≥24 points on mini-mental state examination (placing participants at matched mental status) ; are medically stable and; and are within the sub-acute to chronic phase of their rehabilitation (10 weeks to 6-months post stroke).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be excluded if they have serious medical conditions such as HIV/AIDS or TB, which could additionally affect the outcomes evaluated in this study. Participants with depression, having recurrent stroke, still receiving in inpatient rehabilitation, with cognitive or receptive language difficulties and are unable to comprehend the intervention will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intervention group
Will receive one session of up to one-hour per week over a six-week period in self-management in addition to their usual rehabilitation and workbook.
one session of up to one-hour per week over a six-week period in addition to their usual rehabilitation. During each session strategies will be used to promote specific behaviors that exemplify the hallmarks of self-management. These behaviors include enabling patients to work out ways of taking control of their daily lives by setting small targets, recording their progress and problem-solving. The content of the sessions is determined by the patient and their personal goals rather than being professionally directed
Other: control group
Will receive booklet consist of home exercises and education besides the usual care
Participants will receive usual rehabilitation treatment, they will also be given a booklet with education program and exercises they can perform at home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire(SSEQ):
Time Frame: baseline to the 6 months after intervention
The SSEQ is a 13 point questionnaire developed by Jones et al (2008) and is aimed to determine the individuals perceived level of self-efficacy in completing a range of relevant functional tasks, such as walking, getting comfortable in bed, as well as several self-management tasks
baseline to the 6 months after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Rivermead Mobility Index:
Time Frame: baseline to the 6 months after intervention
is a 15 point index with various topics and questions aimed at objectively determining the participant's mobility level. According to Lennon & Johnson (2000) highly reliable between raters (ICC = 0.98, p < 0.001) with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93).
baseline to the 6 months after intervention
Rivermead Activities of Daily Living Scale:
Time Frame: baseline to the 6 months after intervention
is a 31 point scale used to determine the level of independence a participant has with self-care and household tasks of varying difficulty. It has an excellent overall test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96) (Chen et al, 2007) and an excellent concurrent validity at 180 days post stroke (r = 0.93) (Hsueh et al, 2003).
baseline to the 6 months after intervention
The Mini-BESTest:
Time Frame: baseline to the 6 months after intervention
is a 14-item clinical test that covers four components of balance control (anticipatory postural adjustments, postural responses, sensory orientation and stability in gait). Each item is scored from 0 (unable or requiring help) to 2 (normal) and the maximal score is 28 points. The Mini-BESTest has an excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96), with an excellent convergent validity (r = 0.96) (Godi et al, 2013).
baseline to the 6 months after intervention
The Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome scale
Time Frame: baseline to the 6 months after intervention
a 10 point rating index aimed at determining the participants' perceived extent of participation within the community, with its main domains as perceived functioning and social connectedness. SIPSO has been shown to present an excellent test-retest reliability with ICC = 0.96 and has indicated a proven validity (Trigg & Wood, 2003).
baseline to the 6 months after intervention
National Institute for Health Stroke Scale
Time Frame: baseline to the 6 months after intervention
is a 15 item neurologic examination that provides a quantitative measure of stroke-related neurologic deficit. According to Kasner et al, (1999) reliability Agreement between pairs of raters was also very good to excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.70 to 0.89.
baseline to the 6 months after intervention
Action Research Arm Test
Time Frame: baseline to the 6 months after intervention
is a 19 item scale divided into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. The items within each subscale are arranged on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating normal performance on each item. The maximum score on the ARAT is 57 points According to McDonnell, 2008 Inter-rater and retest reliability have been shown to be high (ICC > 0.98) in studies involving patients with stroke and Concurrent validity has been confirmed by comparison with the upper limb component of the Fugl- Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS).
baseline to the 6 months after intervention
6-minute walk test
Time Frame: baseline to the 6 months after intervention
Functional ability will be assessed using the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), a reliable and valid measure for the stroke population. Participants will be instructed to walk at a comfortable pace on a 30-m measured walkway for 6 minutes. The outcome will be the total distance covered during testing. 6MWT exhibits excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.973; 95 % CI = 0.925 to 0.988), it presents a minimal detectable change of 54.1 m, and an acceptable concurrent validity (r = 0.52 to 0.89) (Fulk et al, 2008).
baseline to the 6 months after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Currently not allowed by ethic to share the data with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Self Efficacy

Clinical Trials on self-management

3
Subscribe