Misoprostol for Cervical Priming Before Office Hysteroscopy

October 14, 2017 updated by: sarah mohamed hassan, Kasr El Aini Hospital

Randomized Control Trial Comparing Patient Acceptability and Tolerance to Pain Using Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Priming Before Office Hysteroscopy.

The objective of the present study is to evaluate the appropriate route of administration of misoprostol, either oral or vaginal, for cervical priming to facilitate the procedure of office hysteroscopy and reduce patient discomfort to minimum

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Sample size calculation was done using the comparison of pain sensation represented through VAS between oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before office hysteroscopy. As reported in previous publication (Sordia-Herna'ndez et al., 2011), the mean ±SD of VAS in oral misoprostol group was approximately 6.04 ± 1.5, while in vaginal misoprostol group was approximately 2.8 ± 1.2. Accordingly, we calculated that the minimum proper sample size was 23 women in each arm to be able to detect a real difference of 1 unit with 80% power at α = 0.05 level using Student's t test for independent samples. Sample size calculation was done using Stats Direct statistical software version 2.7.2 for MS Windows, StatsDirect Ltd., Cheshire, UK

However, the study population consists of 100 patients in reproductive age that requires diagnostic hysteroscopy for investigation of infertility or AUB.

The patients will be recruited from Office hysteroscopy clinic of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University from October 2017 to march 2018.

The Patients will be allocated equally into 2 groups ( each group contain 50 patients)

Groups will be as follows:

  1. Group A: 50 patients receive 200 mg oral misoprostol (Misotac; Sigma Pharm) 3h before the procedure.
  2. Group B: 50 patients receive 200 mg misoprostol (Misotac; Sigma Pharm) 3h before the procedure moistened with saline solution will be inserted in posterior fornix of vagina.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11562
        • Recruiting
        • Kasr El Ainiy Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients indicated for diagnostic hysteroscopy for infertility or AUB.
  2. Reproductive age >19 - 45yrs.
  3. Postmenstrual between days 7 and 11 of the cycle ( except in irregular bleeding)

Exclusion criteria:

Contraindicating the use of prostaglandins such as:-

  1. Cardiovascular disease
  2. Severe bronchial asthma.
  3. Hypertension.
  4. Renal failure.
  5. Known sensitivity to Prostaglandins

Contraindication to office hysteroscopy such as:-

  1. Pelvic inflammatory disease.
  2. Marked cervical stenosis.
  3. Known cervical malignancy.
  4. pregnancy
  5. profuse uterine bleeding
  6. Recent uterine perforation.

Neurological disorders affecting the evaluation of pain.

Previous cervical surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group A
50 patients receive 200 mg oral misoprostol (Misotac; Sigma Pharm) 3h before office hysteroscopy
A rigid 30 4-mm hysteroscope (Karl Storz Endoscopy) will be used without anaesthesia or analgesia 3 hours after administration of misoprostol. The uterine cavity will be distended with normal saline solution at a pressure of 100-120 mm Hg. The vaginoscopic ''no touch'' technique was followed; no speculum or tenaculum was used.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: group B
50 patients receive 200 mg misoprostol (Misotac; Sigma Pharm) 3h before office hysteroscopy moistened with saline solution will be inserted in posterior fornix of vagina.
A rigid 30 4-mm hysteroscope (Karl Storz Endoscopy) will be used without anaesthesia or analgesia 3 hours after administration of misoprostol. The uterine cavity will be distended with normal saline solution at a pressure of 100-120 mm Hg. The vaginoscopic ''no touch'' technique was followed; no speculum or tenaculum was used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain sensation:
Time Frame: The VAS will be applied immediately after the procedure ended.
the level of pelvic pain will be rated according to a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS).
The VAS will be applied immediately after the procedure ended.
Patient acceptability
Time Frame: The VAS will be applied immediately after the procedure ended.
according to a 10-point VAS
The VAS will be applied immediately after the procedure ended.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding
Time Frame: during the procedure.
Bleeding during and after the procedure.
during the procedure.
Procedure time
Time Frame: it will be reported immediately after the process ended
Procedure time from introduction of the office hysteroscopy through the external cervical os and the visualization of the uterine cavity.
it will be reported immediately after the process ended
Ease of cervical entry by hysteroscopy
Time Frame: The VAS will be applied immediately after the procedure ended.
Ease of cervical entry by hysteroscopy to evaluate the uterine cavity according to a 10-point VAS.
The VAS will be applied immediately after the procedure ended.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12345 (Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Misoprostol Allergy

Clinical Trials on office hysteroscopy

3
Subscribe