TC02 Obese Women Using It Morphine vs PCA IV Hydromorphone for Post-Cesarean Analgesia

May 5, 2022 updated by: Feyce M. Peralta, MD, MS, Northwestern University

Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Measurements in Obese Women Using Intrathecal Morphine Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Hydromorphone for Post-Cesarean Analgesia

Cesarean deliveries are the most commonly performed surgery in the United States and account for 32.9% of all births.8,9 The ASA recommends the use of neuraxial opioids of post-cesarean analgesia partly because respiratory depression in the obstetric population, as measured by intermittent respiratory rate and pulse oximetry, is reported to be low (0-1.2%).10,11 Respiratory depression lacks a standard definition,12 but the most sensitive means of detecting respiratory depression is hypercapnia.1,3 Two recent studies using continuous hypercapnia (>50mmHg PaCO2) monitoring demonstrated higher rates of respiratory depression (17.8-37%) in healthy, non-obese women receiving intrathecal opioids for post-cesarean analgesia.13,14 In addition, supplemental opioids are required in the majority of women receiving intrathecal morphine and may increase the risk of respiratory depression.11,14 Anesthesiologists debate whether neuraxial opioids or intravenous patient controlled opioid analgesia (PCA) are the safest practice for postoperative analgesia in obese parturients following cesarean delivery. The ASA recommendations to employ neuraxial analgesia post-cesarean delivery does not differentiate between non-obese and obese women who now make up 30.3% in US women of child-bearing age.2 Obesity has been described as a risk factor for respiratory depression in those receiving opioids via any route of opioid administration,11,15, 17 but whether obesity itself is the risk factor or associated co-morbidities such as sleep apnea is debated.

Studies are conflicting whether intrathecal opioids or patient controlled intravenous opioids cause more respiratory depression. Several studies have documented the incidence of respiratory depression with IV PCA; the rates range from 0.19% to 5.2%, which are equivalent or higher than those reported for intrathecal opioids. (Hagle 16). Dalchow et al. demonstrated higher rates of hypercapnia in patients receiving intrathecal opioid compared with those receiving intravenous opioid via patient controlled analgesia in nonobese women following cesarean delivery. (Dalchow)

The Topological Oscillation Search with Kinematical Analysis (TOSCA) monitor allows a noninvasive method to measure transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels, with relative accuracy compared to arterial carbon dioxide monitoring.4-7 No studies have examined transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels in obese women following cesarean delivery using any form of postoperative analgesia. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial using continuous transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring to evaluate the degree of respiratory depression in obese women receiving neuraxial opioid compared to intravenous opioid via PCA for post-cesarean analgesia.

Two studies have demonstrated high rates of hypercapnia in non-obese women following administration of intrathecal morphine for cesarean delivery in the postpartum period. (Dalchow, Bauchat) Dalchow et al. demonstrated higher rates of hypercapnia in women receiving intrathecal diamorphine than intravenous morphine delivered via patient controlled analgesia. It is unclear whether intrathecal morphine causes more or less respiratory depression than intravenous opioid delivered via patient-controlled analgesia in obese women.

This study will add to the understanding of respiratory function in the immediate postpartum period in obese women using opioids via intrathecal or intravenous routes. This study will better inform guidelines for the postpartum analgesic route of choice in the obese obstetric population and allow the investigators to make recommendations for the detection and prevention of respiratory depression after opioid administration in the obstetric population.

Objective is to examine the transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels in obese women using either intrathecal morphine or intravenous patient-controlled hydromorphone for post-cesarean analgesia.

The hypothesis is carbon dioxide levels will be significantly higher in obese women receiving intrathecal morphine versus obese women receiving intravenous patient controlled intravenous hydromorphone.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Term (≥37 week's gestation)
  • Healthy
  • ASA class 2-3
  • BMI ≥40kg/m2 scheduled for elective cesarean section whose anesthetic plan is for neuraxial anesthesia (spinal or combined-spinal epidural technique)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with ASA >3,
  • BMI <40 kg/m2
  • Allergy to any of the medications used for pain control
  • Contraindication to the spinal anesthetic technique
  • Known sleep apnea or other sleep disordered breathing
  • Regular use of other medications that cause respiratory depression (ie. benzodiazepines).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intrathecal Morphine
Administration of 100µg intrathecal morphine to be given in the operative area.
Intrathecal Morphine administered in the operating room.
Active Comparator: Intravenous Hydromorphone
Administration of intravenous hydromorphone give IV pca in the post operative area.
Intravenous hydromorphone administered via IV in the post operative area.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of hypercapnia
Time Frame: 24 hours post delivery
Incidence of hypercapnia (transcutaneous CO2 levels >50mmHg) in the intrathecal morphine versus patient controlled intravenous morphine groups
24 hours post delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours post delivery
Amount of opioids used during the time from delivery to 24 hours post delivery
24 hours post delivery
NSAID consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours post delivery
Amount of NSAID's used during the time from delivery to 24 hours post delivery.
24 hours post delivery
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: 24 hours post delivery
Hourly respiratory rates for the first 12 hours then every 2 hours for the next 12 hours.
24 hours post delivery
Sedation scores
Time Frame: delivery to 12 hours post delivery
Sedation scores as scored on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale at 2 hours, 6 hour and 12 hours post delivery.
delivery to 12 hours post delivery
Pain Scores
Time Frame: 24 hours
Pain scores on a scale of 0 (low)-10 (high) will be documented every hour for the first 24 hours after delivery.
24 hours
Pulse oximetry
Time Frame: 24 hours post delivery
Pulse oximetry will be collected using the transcutaneous Co2 monitor for 24 hours after deliuvery.
24 hours post delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Feyce Peralta, MD, Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Intrathecal Morphine

3
Subscribe