- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07322029
Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery has become the standard approach for the treatment of benign and malignant gynecologic diseases, offering the advantages of reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery. However, postoperative pain remains a major barrier to optimal recovery, with up to 40% of patients experiencing moderate to severe pain within the first 24 hours after laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic gynecologic surgery typically induces both somatic pain from abdominal wall incisions and visceral pain caused by peritoneal traction and pneumoperitoneum, making effective analgesia challenging. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is commonly used to control somatic incisional pain but provides limited relief of visceral pain, often resulting in increased opioid consumption and opioid-related adverse effects such as dizziness and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) offers potent and long-lasting visceral analgesia with minimal systemic opioid requirements and has demonstrated safety and efficacy across multiple surgical settings. The complementary analgesic mechanisms of TAPB and intrathecal morphine suggest that their combination may enhance postoperative recovery by improving pain control while reducing opioid use.
The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate whether the combination of intrathecal morphine and TAPB improves the quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery compared with TAPB alone. This study aims to provide high-quality clinical evidence to guide the development of an optimized multimodal analgesia strategy for patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia combined with bilateral transversus abdominis plane block. The intervention group will additionally receive intrathecal morphine, whereas the control group will receive intrathecal saline. After entering the operating room, routine monitoring will include electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide. Prior to anesthesia induction, patients in the intervention group will undergo lumbar intrathecal injection of morphine at the L3/4 or L4/5 or L5/S1 interspace. Based on previous literature and clinical experience, intrathecal morphine will be administered at a dose of 2 ug/kg. The control group will receive an equivalent volume of intrathecal normal saline under identical conditions.
General anesthesia will be induced with intravenous dexmedetomidine (0.5 ug/kg), Propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg), remifentanil (TCI 4 ng/mL), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), followed by endotracheal intubation. Bilateral TAPB will be performed in all patients under ultrasound guidance. A total of 60 mL of diluted bupivacaine liposome (20 mL: 266 mg diluted to 60 mL with normal saline) will be administered, with 15 mL injected at each of the bilateral subcostal and lateral approaches (total 60 mL). Anesthesia maintenance will include 1.0-1.3 MAC desflurane, remifentanil, sufentanil, rocuronium, and vasoactive medications as required. Intraoperative opioid consumption will be recorded.
Postoperative analgesia will be provided using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), consisting of 100 mg morphine diluted to a total volume of 100 mL. The PCA settings will include no background dose, a 1-mL bolus dose, and a 6-minute lockout interval. In cases of adverse events such as hypotension, fluid resuscitation and vasoactive support will be provided, and PCA parameters may be reduced or discontinued by an independent nurse if necessary.
The primary outcome of this study is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and other opioid-related adverse events. This trial aims to evaluate whether the combination of intrathecal morphine and TAPB provides superior analgesia and improves recovery after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Renchun Lai, MD
- Phone Number: +8613660012343
- Email: lairch@sysucc.org.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Guangzhou
-
Guangdong, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
-
Contact:
- Renchun Lai, MD
- Phone Number: +8613660012343
- Email: lairch@sysucc.org.cn
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female patients aged ≥18 years.
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery under general anesthesia.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
- Able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia.
- Allergy to morphine or local anesthetics.
- Long-term opioid use (>20 morphine milligram equivalents per day).
- Baseline NRS pain score >3.
- Cognitive impairment or inability to cooperate.
- Emergency or non-elective surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intrathecal morphine group
Before anesthesia induction, patients in the intervention group received an intrathecal injection of morphine at the L3-4 or L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace.
The intrathecal morphine dose was 2 μg/kg.
|
With the patient in the lateral position, the puncture site was identified under ultrasound guidance.
After local anesthesia, a spinal needle was advanced into the subarachnoid space, and intrathecal morphine was injected following confirmation of free cerebrospinal fluid flow.
With the patient supine, a linear ultrasound probe was placed between the costal margin and iliac crest to identify the abdominal wall layers.
Using an in-plane approach, a needle was advanced into the transversus abdominis plane, and after negative aspiration, liposomal bupivacaine was injected under direct ultrasound visualization.
The block was performed bilaterally.
|
|
Active Comparator: Normal saline group
Before anesthesia induction, patients in the control group received an intrathecal injection of an equal volume of preservative-free normal saline at the L3-4 or L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace.
|
With the patient supine, a linear ultrasound probe was placed between the costal margin and iliac crest to identify the abdominal wall layers.
Using an in-plane approach, a needle was advanced into the transversus abdominis plane, and after negative aspiration, liposomal bupivacaine was injected under direct ultrasound visualization.
The block was performed bilaterally.
With the patient in the lateral position, the puncture site was identified under ultrasound guidance.
After local anesthesia, a spinal needle was advanced into the subarachnoid space, and an equal volume of preservative-free normal saline was injected after confirming cerebrospinal fluid flow.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
QoR-15 score at 24 hours after surgery
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
The Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing postoperative recovery across five domains (pain, physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence, and psychological support).
Total scores range from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery.
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
QoR-15 score at 48 and 72 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 48 and 72 hours after surgery
|
The QoR-15 total score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery.
|
48 and 72 hours after surgery
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score at rest and cough at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
|
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
|
24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
|
|
Rest and cough NRS scores in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after surgery
Time Frame: 30 minutes after surgery
|
Pain intensity will be assessed using the NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity
|
30 minutes after surgery
|
|
Cumulative morphine equivalent consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
|
24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
|
|
|
Time to first postoperative flatus
Time Frame: Up to 1 week after surgery
|
Up to 1 week after surgery
|
|
|
Time to first ambulation after surgery
Time Frame: Up to 1 week after surgery
|
Time from surgery to the first postoperative ambulation.
|
Up to 1 week after surgery
|
|
Urinary catheter indwelling time
Time Frame: Up to 1 week after surgery
|
Time from surgery to urinary catheter removal.
|
Up to 1 week after surgery
|
|
Time to first analgesic request
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
|
|
Total amount of additional analgesic medication at 24, 48, 72 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
|
24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
|
|
|
Patient satisfaction assessed by a 0-100 numeric scale
Time Frame: At 72 hours after surgery
|
Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia will be assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the lowest level of satisfaction and 100 indicates the highest level of satisfaction.
|
At 72 hours after surgery
|
|
Length of hospital stay (days)
Time Frame: From surgery to hospital discharge
|
Length of hospital stay is defined as the number of days from surgery to hospital discharge.
|
From surgery to hospital discharge
|
|
Incidence of postoperative shoulder pain assessed by the NRS
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
Postoperative shoulder pain will be assessed by patient report, defined as the presence of shoulder pain with a NRS score ≥1 during the postoperative period.
|
Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
|
Incidence of adverse events at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
|
Postoperative adverse events include hypotension, dizziness, pruritus, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, assessed by clinical observation and medical records.
|
24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
|
|
Incidence of chronic pain at 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months after surgery
|
3 months and 6 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025-FXY-311
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
-
Gangnam Severance HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopic Gynecological SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompletedLaparoscopic Gynecological SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
Levita MagneticsTerminatedGynecological Laparoscopic SurgeryChile
-
Eximis SurgicalTerminatedLaparoscopic Gynecological SurgeryUnited States
-
Institut Universitari DexeusWithdrawnLaparoscopic Gynecological SurgerySpain
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownLaparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
-
Chengdu Jinjiang Maternity and Child Health HospitalSichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Children's Hospital; People ' s Hospital of Dayi... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingLaparoscopic Surgery | Gynecological Surgery | Intraoperative HypothermiaChina
-
Tangshan Maternal and Child Health HospitalCompletedIntubation | General Anesthetic | Gynecological Laparoscopic SurgeryChina
-
Selcuk UniversityNot yet recruitingInternal Jugular Vein (IJV) Blood Flow in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedAnalgesic Efficacy of M-TAPA Block Accomplished Prior to Surgery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecological SurgeriesEgypt
Clinical Trials on Intrathecal morphine group
-
Hospital Central do FunchalRecruitingAnalgesia | Patient Satisfaction | Post Operative Pain | Cesarean Section Pain | Analgesia ObstetricalPortugal
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenActive, not recruitingAnalgesia | Nausea and Vomiting, Postoperative | Morphine | Morphine Adverse Reaction | Morphine Induced Pruritis | Spinal AnalgesiaBelgium
-
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalCompletedThe Effect of Analgesia Methods Applied in Gynecological Cancer Surgeries on Postoperative AnalgesiaRegional Anesthesia Morbidity | Gynecological Cancer SurgeryTurkey
-
Istituto Giannina GasliniNot yet recruitingPregnancy | Cesarean Section | Neuroaxial Analgesia ProceduresItaly
-
Marmara UniversityActive, not recruitingPain Management | Postoperative AnalgesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
MedtronicNeuroTerminated
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University; Cancer Hospital of Guangxi...Not yet recruiting
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingPostoperative Pain ManagementTurkey
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Thoracic Anesthesia | Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
AUSL Romagna RiminiRecruitingCesarean Section | Post Operative PainItaly