Effectiveness of Bioactiveglass Air Abrasion Versus Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity

January 30, 2019 updated by: Dina Ezz, Cairo University

Effectiveness of Sylc Air Abrasion Bioactive Glass Technology Versus Fluoride Varnish Application in Management of Hypersensitivity of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Will the use of Bioactive glass with air abrasion technology (Sylc) compared to Fluoride Varnish (Biflourid 10) affects the degree of pain in patients complaining from hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Population: Patients complaining from Dentin Hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions.
  • Intervention: Sylc, Air Abrasion Bioactive glass (Denfotex Research Ltd.)
  • Comparison: BiFlourid 10, Fluoride Varnish (VOCO, Germany)
  • Outcome measures: Dentin Hypersensitivity

Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Dentin Hypersensitivity

  • Thermal
  • Tactile
  • Evaporative

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females.
  • Age: 18-70 years old.
  • Patients with good oral hygiene.
  • Co-operative patients who show interest to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with bad oral hygiene.
  • Patients with orthodontic appliances, or bridge work that might interfere with evaluation.
  • Patients who did any periodontal surgeries within the previous 6 months.
  • Patients who are allergic to any ingredients will be used in the study.
  • Pregnant and lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: sylc bioactive glass

Sylc is a dry powder (calcium sodium phosphosilicate), based on NovaMin powder. Bottle of small and coarse particles will be used for the treatment.

Steps:

  1. Isolation: D.M. will make proper isolation for the teeth using cotton rolls.
  2. Hand piece: NSK Prophymate Neo will be used to deliver the powder particles on the sensitive areas. Air stream adjusted at 40-46 psi.
  3. Application: The hand piece will be held at constant distance (3-4mm) away from the tooth surface, with 60-80 degrees on the buccal surfaces. The powder will be applied for 5-10 seconds per tooth in a circular movement.
  4. Suction: High volume suction will be used on lingual side of the teeth to suck any particles, and avoid patient from swallowing it.
a dry powder (calcium sodium phosphosilicate), based on NovaMin powder. Bottle of small and coarse particles will be used for the treatment
Other Names:
  • Sylc bioactive glass
Active Comparator: fluoride varnish (Bifluorid 10)

fluoride varnish Bifluorid 10(by VOCO) will be used. It is a rapid- drying suspension of equal amounts of sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride.

The single dose form will be used, to make sure the amount of fluoride varnish used is standardized.

Steps:

  1. Preparation: The tooth will be properly cleaned, and the surface will be air-dried.
  2. Dispensing: The foil will be pierced using a micro- tim, the opening will be enlarged, the brush will be wet in a circular movement.
  3. Application: Thin coat will be applied on the tooth surface. The varnish will be left from 10-20 seconds then air dried.

Concerning the storage of the Bifluoride 10, it will be stored in refrigerator at the operative clinic to avoid exposure to high temperature or sunlight.

It is a rapid- drying suspension of equal amounts of sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride.
Other Names:
  • Bifluorid 10

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 2 minutes after treatment
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by air blast measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
2 minutes after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 1 week
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by air blast measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
1 week
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by air blast measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
2 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by air blast measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
3 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by air blast measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
4 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by air blast measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
6 months
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 12 months
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by air blast measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
12 months
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (tactile stimulus)
Time Frame: 2 minutes after treatment
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by tactile stimulation with a probe measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
2 minutes after treatment
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (tactile stimulus)
Time Frame: 1 week
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by tactile stimulation with a probe measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
1 week
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (tactile stimulus)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by tactile stimulation with a probe measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
2 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (tactile stimulus)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by tactile stimulation with a probe measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
3 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (tactile stimulus)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by tactile stimulation with a probe measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
4 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (tactile stimulus)
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by tactile stimulation with a probe measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
6 months
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (tactile stimulus)
Time Frame: 12 months
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by tactile stimulation with a probe measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
12 months
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (thermal stimulus)
Time Frame: 2 minutes after treatment
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by cold water measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
2 minutes after treatment
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (thermal stimulus)
Time Frame: 1 week
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by cold water measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
1 week
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (thermal stimulus)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by cold water measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
2 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (thermal stimulus)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by cold water measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
3 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (thermal stimulus)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by cold water measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
4 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (thermal stimulus)
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by cold water measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
6 months
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (thermal stimulus)
Time Frame: 12 months
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by cold water measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dina E Mohamed, Master, Assistant lecturer, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypersensitivity Dentin

3
Subscribe