MR Assessment of Hepatic Hydatid Disease

May 3, 2018 updated by: University College, London

Multi-metric Quantitative MRI for the Assessment of Hepatic Hydatid Disease- a Pilot Study

Hydatid disease is a major healthcare problem worldwide caused by infection that commonly affects the liver. Treatments for hydatid disease depend on how advanced the disease is and if the infection is active or not. Currently, doctors decide what stage the disease is at by looking at the appearance of liver on scans and by performing blood tests. It is however still very difficult to be certain if a treatment is working and when is the right moment to start and stop medication. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanning is a safe and non-invasive way of imaging the liver that can provide detailed information not just about what the liver looks like but also other information about the chemical composition of normal and diseased liver tissue. MRI is already widely used in the NHS for many liver conditions but it is unknown whether analysing the chemical composition will help decide on the stage and activity of hydatid liver disease. This study will allow comparison between MRI information about liver structure and composition with existing methods of assessing disease stage. If fluid is later obtained from the liver as part of usual clinical care (either using a needle with ultrasound or at the time of surgery), this study will also compare information about the fluid composition obtained from MRI scanning, with the results obtained when analysing the fluid in the lab. This will help to develop a more accurate way of non-invasively assessing hydatid disease in the liver, in the future.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cystic echincoccosis (CE), caused by infection with the dog tapeworm, is a major worldwide healthcare problem with increasing prevalence in the developed world. Approximately 75% of CE involves the liver, with treatments incurring significant cost and patient morbidity.

The key to CE treatment is correct identification of active infection but differentiation from sterile disease is highly problematic. Current treatment guidelines base activity assessment on morphological assessment with ultrasound (US), serology and light-microscopy of samples obtained at aspiration/surgery when available. Serology however can take many years to become negative even following successful treatment and US evaluation is subjective. Assessment of disease 'activity' is therefore a major challenge, particularly once patients are undergoing treatment. The lack of accurate tools to assess treatment response has undermined the development of management guidelines, particularly concerning the optimum length of chemotherapy treatment and indications for surgical/image-guided intervention.

Quantitative MR methods present a potential solution to this challenge. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) has shown promising ex vivo results in detecting the biochemical "signature" of active infection in cyst fluid, but has yet to be applied clinically. Alternative approaches including T1 mapping, susceptibility mapping and Diffusion Weighted Imaging/Intra-voxel Incoherent Motion are also potentially useful, but have little supportive data to date.

Non-invasive biomarkers of CE activity are therefore essential to defining specific treatment endpoints, particularly in the context of chemotherapy. Multiple quantitative MR methods could be used to develop composite biomarkers for disease activity. Identifying a new quantitative radiological 'fingerprint' for each stage of the natural life-cycle of hepatic CE will enable improved diagnosis and therapeutic triage.

To date, in vivo liver quantitative MRI has not yet been applied to this cohort of patients, thus representing a novel application of this technology to address an important clinical question.

With this pilot study, the investigators aim to demonstrate the potential of quantitative MRI methods in the assessment of active/inactive hepatic CE.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Recruitment will take place at the hydatid liver disease multidisciplinary team meetings where patients are discussed and considered for inclusion. These patients can be recruited via outpatient consultation clinics.

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Control group:

  • All patients must have cystic lesions which must exceed 30 mm in diameter.
  • All patients must be fasted and avoid caffeinated fluids for at least 4 hours prior to the scan.
  • All patients must be aged 16 or over and able to provide informed consent.

Inclusion Criteria for the CE group:

  • All patients must have hepatic CE, as confirmed by positive serology, with lesions identified on teh standard of care MRI/CT scan, one or more of which must exceed 20 mm in diameter.
  • All patients must be fasted and avoid caffeinated fluids for at least 4 hours prior to the scan.
  • All patients must be aged 16 or over and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Any contraindication to MRI (pacemakers, metallic implants, claustrophobia ect.)
  • Inability to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control Group (CE1)
  • All patients must have cystic lesions which must exceed 30mm in diameter.
  • All patients must be aged 16 or over and able to provide informed consent.
  • Patients will have an MRI scan (not involving ionising radiation)
  • Patients wil have an 'Ultrasound scan (not involving ionising radiation)'
  • Exclusion criteria include pregnancy and any contraindication to MRI (pacemaker, metallic implants, claustrophobia) and inability to give consent.
The MRI study will be conducted by a trained MR radiographer, supervised by the nominated researcher
The US scan will be conducted by a nominated researcher
CE group (CE2-4)
  • All patients must have hepatic CE, as confirmed by positive blood tests, with lesions identified on the standard of care MRI/CT scan, one or more of which must exceed 20 mm in diameter.
  • All patients must be aged 16 or over and able to provide informed consent.
  • All patients will have an MRI scan (not involving ionising radiation)
  • Patients wil have an 'Ultrasound scan (not involving ionising radiation)'
  • Exclusion criteria include pregnancy and any contraindication to MRI (pacemaker, metallic implants, claustrophobia) and inability to give consent.
  • Patients from the CE group undergoing surgery or aspiration will have fluid samples sent for analysis as part of standard clinical care. These cyst fluid samples will then be transported to the MRI scanner for Ex vivo scanning.
The MRI study will be conducted by a trained MR radiographer, supervised by the nominated researcher
The US scan will be conducted by a nominated researcher
The MRI study will be conducted by a trained MR radiographer, supervised by the nominated researcher
For patients undergoing surgery/radiologically guided aspiration the aspiration will be performed by a surgeon (at the Royal Free Hospital) or radiologist
The blood sample will be drawn by a member of the clinical team

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcome measure is MR spectroscopy metabolite
Time Frame: 1 year
This will be assessed on water ratio
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16/0811

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Echincoccosis

Clinical Trials on MRI scan (not involving ionising radiation)

3
Subscribe