A Self-efficAcy Intervention to reDuce Injecting Risk behAviour and hePatitis c reinfecTion Rates (ADAPT)

August 12, 2020 updated by: John Dillon, University of Dundee

Integrating Health Psychology Into Hepatitis c Treatment: a Self-efficAcy Intervention to reDuce Injecting Risk behAviour and hePatitis c reinfecTion Rates

The study evaluates the use of implementation intentions to increase self-efficacy and reduce injecting risk behaviour in a sample of injecting drug users on treatment for hepatitis C (HCV). The overall aim is to reduce HCV reinfection rates. The primary objective is to identify lower injecting risk behaviour scores in patients on treatment for hepatitis C receiving the psychosocial intervention compared to the same patient group assigned to the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The intervention will entail completing a volitional help sheet.This will create implementation intentions, which are self-regulatory strategies taking the form of "if-then" plans (i.e. situation-solution plan).

Injecting risk behaviour scores and self-efficacy scores will be analysed for differences between intervention and control groups.

To control for contact-time with the researchers, participants in the control group will spend approximately 20 minutes with the researcher exploring Zimbardo's time perspective constructs (ZTPI, Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999) and completing the short Zimbardo's time perspective inventory (Orosz et al. 2017). The inventory was selected because the cognitive processes involved in accessing time constructs will also be activated in the intervention group for the planning of coping strategies and goal achievement during future injecting risk situations.

The study also aims:

  • To assess the variability in injecting risk behaviour as explained by subjective norms, social connectedness and group identification constructs;
  • To assess the variability in intervention effectiveness as explained by changes in mental health, illness perception subjective norms, social connectedness, and group identification.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dundee, United Kingdom, DD1 4NA
        • Cairn Centre Needle Exchange

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or Female. (Over 18 years of age);
  • Chronic HCV positive infection;
  • Current illicit drug use established through participants' self-report;
  • Current HCV treatment provided by the NHS;
  • Informed consent, agreeing to study and monitoring criteria;
  • English-speaking.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent;
  • Aggressive or violent behaviour;
  • Not currently receiving HCV treatment;
  • Inability to communicate in English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Volitional help sheet
This brief intervention will last around 20 minutes. The participants and the researcher will read through the list of real-life solutions the participants might find applicable to them. They will then read through the list of situations one by one. The participant will draw a coloured line between the situation and the solution which seems more appropriate to them. The volitional help sheet helps create implementation intentions, which are self-regulatory strategies taking the form of "if-then" plans (i.e. situation-solution plan).
No Intervention: Control
Short Zimbardo's time perspective inventory (Orosz et al. 2017)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Injecting Risk Behaviour
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Self-reported injecting risk behaviour over the past 4 weeks. Seventeen items scored 1-4 (1 frequently, 4 never)
4 weeks
Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Self-reported confidence in one's own ability to refuse sharing of injecting equipment and use of old injecting equipment. Fifteen items scored 1-7 (1 high confidence, 7 low confidence)
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Norms
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
Self-reported social norms of individual's injecting network. Four items scored 1-7 (1 strong acceptance of sharing equipment, 7 no acceptance of sharing equipment).
Up to 4 weeks
Social Connectedness
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Self-reported perceived social connectedness to general society. Eight items scored 1-6 (1 low connectedness, 6 high connectedness)
Up to 8 weeks
Group Identification
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Self-reported perceived identification with family group and injecting group. Eight items scored 1-7 (1 high identification, 7 low identification).
Up to 8 weeks
Depression
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Self-reported depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks. Nine items scored 0-3 (0 no symptoms, 3 depressive symptoms)
2 weeks
Anxiety
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Self-reported depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks. Nine items scored 0-3 (0 no symptoms, 3 depressive symptoms)
2 weeks
Post traumatic stress disorder
Time Frame: 1 month
Self-reported trauma-induced stress symptoms over the past month. Five items scored Yes/No.
1 month
Working alliance
Time Frame: Treatment duration (12 weeks)
Self-reported therapeutic alliance with provider of hepatitis C treatment care over treatment duration. Eight items scored 1-5 (1 poor alliance, 5 excellent alliance).
Treatment duration (12 weeks)
Illness perception
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Self-reported perception of hepatitis C as an illness. Eight items scored 1-10 (1 no impact on quality of life, 10 high impact on quality of life).
Up to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C

Clinical Trials on Volitional Help Sheet

Subscribe