WebMAP Mobile Self-management of Adolescent Chronic Pain

June 6, 2019 updated by: Tonya Palermo, Seattle Children's Hospital

Web-based Self-management of Adolescent Chronic Pain: National Implementation Project

Approximately 5-8% of children report severe chronic pain and disability. Although evidence supports pain-self management as effective for reducing pain and disability, data show that most youth do not have access to this intervention. The investigative team's prior studies demonstrate that technology-delivered pain self-management (WebMAP program) can reduce barriers to care, is feasible, acceptable, and effective in reducing pain-related disability and improving anxiety and depression in youth with chronic pain. In this trial, the investigators propose an implementation project to address critical challenges in nationwide dissemination of the WebMAP pain self-management program. Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial design, 8 clinics from across the U.S. will participate in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a stepped wedge design to sequentially implement WebMAP in the clinics following randomized usual care periods. Data will be collected from clinic records, web and app administrative tracking, and provider surveys to gather information on adoption and implementation following the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) public health impact framework. Individual patient-level pain outcomes will be collected from 140 patients to evaluate intervention effectiveness. The expected outcome of the project is to yield a strategic approach for a nationwide technology-delivered pain self-management intervention for youth with chronic pain that can be readily sustained in clinical settings.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

143

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06106
        • Connecticut Children's Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • C.S. Mott Children's Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
        • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. child age 10-17 years,
  2. has chronic pain defined as pain present for at least 3 months, and
  3. has access to a smartphone or web-enabled device (e.g., laptop, computer, iPad).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. non-English speaking,
  2. presently in a psychiatric crisis,
  3. cognitive impairments or intellectual disabilities (has to be able to complete surveys independently),
  4. does not have access to a smartphone, computer, or internet, and
  5. is unable to read at the 5th grade level.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: WebMAP Mobile
Adolescent participants assigned to this arm will receive access to the WebMAP mobile program delivering cognitive-behavioral intervention for chronic pain. Parents of adolescents will receive access to cognitive-behavioral strategies for parents on the WebMAP parent web site.
WebMAP is a technology-based cognitive-behavioral intervention program that teaches relaxation skills, pain coping strategies and parent behavioral and communication techniques to youth with chronic pain and their parents.
No Intervention: Usual care
Participants assigned to this arm will receive usual care from the pain or specialty clinic during the non-exposure periods in the stepped wedge design.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in activity limitations
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 month followup
The 9-item Child Activity Limitations Interview (CALI-9) will be completed on the online diary to rate perceived difficulty in completing 9 daily activities due to pain
Baseline to 3 month followup

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 month followup
Pain intensity will be measured prospectively on the 11-point Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with anchors of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible). Average scores over 7-day assessment periods will be used in analyses.
Baseline to 3 month followup
Change in anxiety and depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 month followup
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Emotional Distress scale is an 8-item scale of anxiety with scores ranging from 8 to 40 (higher scores indicate greater fear, anxious misery, and hyperarousal). The 8-item scale of depressive symptoms has scores ranging from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Total anxiety and total depression T-scores will be used in analyses.
Baseline to 3 month followup
Change in pain-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 month followup
Pain Self-Efficacy Scale-4 is a 4-item measure that assesses beliefs in carrying out activities when in pain. Total sum score ranging from 0 to 24 will be used in analysis with higher scores representing greater self-efficacy.
Baseline to 3 month followup
Patient's global impression of change
Time Frame: 3 month followup
1-item measure asking about change since receiving treatment
3 month followup
Change in parent behavior
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 month followup
Parents report on their protective behaviors on the Adult Responses to Child Symptoms (ARCS), a 29-item scale with subscale scores for three factors, Protect, Minimize, Distract and Monitor. Each subscale is scored by computing the mean of the item responses ranging from 0 to 4 (higher scores indicate more maladaptive behaviors)
Baseline to 3 month followup
Change in parent emotional distress
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 month followup
Parents report on their anxiety and depression symptoms on the PROMIS Adult Emotional Distress scale. This includes a 4-item scale of anxiety with scores ranging from 4 to 20 (higher scores indicate greater anxiety), and a 4-item scale of depression with scores ranging from 4 to 20 (higher scores indicate greater depression. Total anxiety and depression scale T-scores will be used in analyses.
Baseline to 3 month followup
Change in insomnia severity
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 month followup
Insomnia Severity Index is a 7-item self-report measure. A 5-point Likert scale is used to rate each item about the severity and impact of insomnia symptoms with scores ranging from 0 to 28 (higher scores indicate greater insomnia sympotoms). A Total score will be used in analyses.
Baseline to 3 month followup

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adoption - setting level
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 months
Proportion of children referred to WebMAP at each clinic/Number seen in each clinic
Assessed at 24 months
Reach
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 months
Number of people agree to participate/Number of eligible participants referred for intervention
Assessed at 24 months
Implementation, organization level
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 months
Provider survey regarding feasibility of implementing WebMAP and attitudes toward adoption
Assessed at 24 months
Maintenance, organization level
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 months
Proportion of clinics agreeing to continue using WebMAP
Assessed at 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tonya Palermo, PhD, Seattle Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pfizer 27971161

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Cognitive-behavioral intervention for chronic pain

Subscribe