Randomized Trial of eOncoNote

April 27, 2021 updated by: Eva Grunfeld, University of Toronto

Improving Cancer Care Together Through eOncoNote

Improving Cancer Care Together through eOncoNote is a pragmatic randomized trial involving a secure online eConsultation system (referred to as eOncoNote) that will allow primary care providers and cancer specialist providers to communicate about their patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overall objectives of this randomized trial are to test an intervention designed to improve coordination/continuity of care between primary care providers (PCPs) and cancer specialist providers (CSPs), and to improve patient experience with regards to patients' perceived continuity of care. Participants will be patients at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre in any one of three phases of the cancer continuum: diagnosis (colorectal, prostate, or lung cancer), active treatment (breast or prostate cancer) or survivorship (breast or colorectal cancer). The intervention involves a secure online eConsultation system that will allow PCPs and CSPs to communicate about their patient. Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: 1) intervention group whereby their PCP and CSP will use a cancer-specific modification of the eConsultation system (eOncoNote) in addition to usual methods of communication or 2) control group receiving usual care (i.e. usual methods of communication such as telephone, fax, mailed consultation letters and progress notes). Randomization and outcomes will be at the level of the individual patient. The primary outcome is patients' perception of team/cross-boundary continuity. Secondary outcomes include measures of patients' anxiety and depression, and patients' experience of the care process. Qualitative methods including interviews with patients, PCPs, CSPs, and cancer system managers will also be conducted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

181

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Patient inclusion criteria:

  • at least 18 years of age,
  • being in one of the following three cancer continuum specific phases:

    1. Diagnosis phase: patients referred to the Cancer Assessment Clinic with suspected colorectal, prostate, or lung cancer;
    2. Treatment phase: patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer, or radical or adjuvant radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer;
    3. Survivorship phase: patients referred to the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program post completion of their adjuvant therapy for either breast or colorectal cancer with the intent of being discharged for survivorship care to their own family physician;
  • no prior history of cancer in the past 5 years (those with non-melanoma skin cancer can participate).

Patient exclusion criteria:

  • Currently participating in another study requiring ongoing completion of patient reported outcome measures (such as quality of life measures) in order to minimize respondent burden,
  • Does not have a primary care provider,
  • Patients will be excluded if their primary care provider has another patient enrolled in the trial in order to control for contamination between randomization groups,
  • Inability to read and write in English,
  • Inability to provide informed consent, and
  • In the survivorship phase, patients who are discharged to the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program nurse practitioner (rather than their primary care providers) will be excluded.

Primary care providers eligibility criteria:

  • Licensed family physician or nurse practitioner,
  • Their patient has consented to be enrolled in the study, and they do not have any other patients enrolled in the study (to avoid contamination between intervention and control groups),
  • They are already registered on the Champlain BASE(TM) eConsult system prior to their patient being enrolled in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Primary care providers whose patients have been randomized to the intervention group will receive an invitation from their patient's cancer specialist provider to communicate using eOncoNote. Primary care providers and cancer specialist providers will use eOncoNote in addition to usual methods of communication.
  • Diagnosis phase: The patient's nurse navigator will initiate an eOncoNote to the patient's PCP, inviting them to send any questions related to the patient's diagnostic process. The nurse navigator will initiate case closure after the diagnostic process has been completed (case will be open up to 4 months).
  • Treatment phase: The patient's medical or radiation oncologist will initiate an eOncoNote to the patient's PCP inviting them to ask questions related to the patient's cancer treatment and/or request information related to the patient's co-morbidities. The oncologist will initiate case closure after the treatment has been completed.
  • Survivorship phase: The patient's registered nurse within the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program will send an eOncoNote invitation to the patient's PCP inviting them to ask any questions as the patient transitions back to their care. The nurse will initiate case closure after one year.
No Intervention: Control group
Primary care providers whose patients have been randomized to the control group will receive usual care (i.e. their primary care providers will not access eOncoNote to communicate with the cancer specialist providers and vice versa) and will be able to contact each other via telephone, fax, and mail consultation letters and progress notes, as per usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Team/Cross Boundary Continuity subscale of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months
4-item subscale (scored on a five-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree); calculate the mean of the items in the subscale
Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7); 7 items; 4 response options ("not at all" = 0; "several days" = 1; "more than half the days" = 2; "nearly every day" = 3)
(Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Depression
Time Frame: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Patient Health Questionnaire on major depression (PHQ-9); 10 items in total; items 1-9: 4 response options ("not at all" = 0; "several days" = 1; "more than half the days" = 2; "nearly every day" = 3); item 10: four-point scale (ranging from "not difficult at all" to "extremely difficult")
(Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Patient experience of the care process
Time Frame: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire (PPE-15); 15 items; each item scored as dichotomous score indicating presence or absence of a problem (defined as an aspect of health care that could be improved upon from the patient's perspective)
(Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Team/Cross Boundary Continuity subscale of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months
4-item subscale (scored on a five-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree); calculate the mean of the items in the subscale
Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eva Grunfeld, MD, DPhil, University of Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 17, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe