Randomized Double-blind Study on the Benefit of Spironolactone for Treating Acne of Adult Woman. (FASCE)

July 17, 2023 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Acne vulgaris of adult woman has increased over the past 10 years; it affects currently 20% to 30% of adult women.

The physiopathology of adult woman acne is distinguished from the teenager one by essentially 2 factors:

  • hormonal factor with a peripheral hyperandrogenism coupled with an hypersensibility of cutaneous androgens receptors of these women. But this point is still at the stage of hypothesis.
  • inflammatory factor linked with Propionibacterium Aces ; indeed these women received most of the time many cures of local and systematic antibiotics at the origin of resistant Propionibacterium Aces strains which lead to a chronical activation of cutaneous innate immunity.

On a therapeutic plan, four types of systemic treatment, approved in this indication are:

  • Tetracyclines which are problematic for the bacterial resistance and consequently constant relapse when they are stopped.
  • Zinc salts which target only the inflammatory lesions and were shown less effective than cycline
  • Antiandrogens, with acetate of cyproterone associated with risks of phlebitis and pulmonary embolism, and increase risk of triglycerides, cholesterol and hepatic balance.
  • The last alternative is represented by isotretinoin but the use in women of childbearing potential is binding because of the teratogen risks and the hyperandrogenism represents an identified risk of relapse.

In this context, the spironolactone could represent an interesting alternative. It blocks the 5-alpha-reductase receptors at sebaceous gland and inhibits Luteinizing hormone (LH) production at the pituitary level. It is not submitted to isotretinoin constraints, does not lead to bacterial resistance and targets the peripheral hyperandrogenism.

Currently, very few studies have been performed and on a weak number of patients but they showed that at low doses (lower than 200mg/day), spironolactone can be effective against acne.

In that context, it seemed clearly interesting to perform the first double-blind randomized study spironolactone vs cyclines which remains the moderate acne reference treatment and to demonstrate the superiority of spironolactone's efficacy in order to establish it as alternative way to cycline.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

158

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brest, France
        • CHRU Brest
      • Caen, France
        • CHU CAEN
      • Grenoble, France
        • CHU Grenoble
      • La Rochelle, France
        • CH La Rochelle
      • Le Mans, France
        • CH Le Mans
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU de Nantes - Dermatologie
      • Poitiers, France
        • CHU Poitiers
      • Tours, France
        • CHRU TOURS
      • Tours, France
        • Cabinet du Dr Jean-Paul Claudel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with acne, with at least 10 inflammatory lesions and no more than 3 nodules
  • Patient who already had one cycline course for her acne treatment with a 3 months* wash out or who never had any cycline
  • Patient having signed an informed consent
  • Absence of use of oral antibiotics and Zinc salts in the last 30 days
  • Absence of use of systemic isotretinoin and antiandrogens in the last 6 months
  • Absence of microphysiotherapy in the last 15 da
  • Women of child-bearing age under contraception since 3 months (oral contraception, implant or IUD).
  • Patients with social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient affected by active /progressive diseases, as infections including Hidradenitis suppurativa, cancers, or endocrine syndrome (eg polycystic ovary syndrome), Addison's disease)
  • Patient affected by Rosacea
  • Patient with contra-indication to the use of one of the investigational products or auxiliary :

    • Patient with intolerance or hypersensitivity to cyclin's, spironolactone or to any ingredient present in associated benzoyl peroxide gel
    • Patient with significant impairment of renal excretory function, acute or chronic renal failure, anuria.
    • Patient with life-threatening or very severe hepatic impairment.(grade III or IV)
  • Patient with hyperkalaemia or strongly requiring potassium-sparing diuretics (eg amiloride, canrenoate, eplerenone, triamterene), or treated continuously with Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonist, NSAIDs, heparin and molecular weight heparin, ciclosporin and tacrolimus.
  • Patient requiring topical isotretinoin or who stopped this drug since less than 2 weeks
  • Patient previously treated with spironolactone
  • Pregnant woman or likely to become pregnant or nursing and refusing to use an effective contraceptive method
  • Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial
  • Patient under guardianship or trusteeship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: spironolactone
Spironolactone ARROW ® 75 mg, 150mg, orally, once a day during all the trial (12 months: 6 months on double-blinded spironolactone then 6 months on open-label spironolactone), + topical therapy during all the trial (benzoyl peroxide 5%)
Dispensation of spironolactone at each visit according to the arm description described above.
Active Comparator: doxycycline
(Doxycycline Sandoz 100 mg), 100mg/day during 3 months followed by placebo during 3 months, on double-blinded + topical therapy during all the trial (benzoyl peroxide 5%
Dispensation of doxycycline then placebo, at each visit according to the arm description described above.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment efficacy
Time Frame: Month 4 and Month 6

The treatment's efficacy will be determined by the rate of success in each arm. The best rate of success between Month 4 and Month 6 will be chosen for the final result. Rate of success, defined by a decrease of both Adult Female Acne Scoring Tool (AFAST) scores 1 and 2:

  1. AFAST score 1: decrease of at least 2 grades compared to baseline or to grade 0 if the baseline was at 1 and
  2. AFAST score 2: decrease to grade 1 if baseline was > 1 or to grade 0 if the baseline was at 1

AFAST 1 (also called GEA) assesses the comedones (open and closed), the non-inflammatory lesions, the papules and pustules and the nodules. The stage is defined according to a global evaluation of severity of acne and ranges from Grade 0 (no acne) to Grade 5 (the worse situation).

AFAST 2 assesses acne on an area from the left and right mandibular zone to the upper edge of the trunk and ranges from Grade 0 (no acne) to Grade 3 (the worse situation).

Month 4 and Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical adverse events
Time Frame: Within 12 months after randomization
Number and type of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) occurring from the beginning of the treatment until end of the follow-up
Within 12 months after randomization
Sodium abnormal values (biological adverse events)
Time Frame: From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9
Sodium measurement (mmol/L)
From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9
Potassium abnormal values (biological adverse events)
Time Frame: From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9
potassium measurement (mmol/L)
From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9
Chlore abnormal values (biological adverse events)
Time Frame: From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9
Chlore measurement (mmol/L)
From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9
Calcium abnormal values (biological adverse events)
Time Frame: From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9
Calcium measurement (mmol/L)
From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9
AFAST score 1 (GEA) at 0 or 1
Time Frame: Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Number of patients with AFAST score 1 (GEA) at 0 or 1.
Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
AFAST score 2 (Mandibular) at 0 or 1
Time Frame: Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Number of patients with AFAST score 2 (Mandibular) at 0 or 1.
Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
AFAST score 1 associated with AFAST score 2 at 0 or 1
Time Frame: M2, M4, M6, M9 and M12
Number of patients with both AFAST score 1 and AFAST score 2 at 0 or 1.
M2, M4, M6, M9 and M12
Quality of life (cost-utility assessment and general quality of life assessment)
Time Frame: Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 dimensions) questionnaire: The questionnaire focuses on five dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, three answers are possible.
Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Quality of life (specific to acne)
Time Frame: Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Cardiff Acne disability Index (CADI) is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring disability induced by acne.
Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Bacterial and parasital evaluations
Time Frame: Day 0 (baseline) and Month 4
Presence of P acnes, M Furfur and S epidermidis, aureus
Day 0 (baseline) and Month 4
Inflammatory lesions of the face
Time Frame: Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Number of inflammatory lesions of the face
Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
retentional lesions of the face
Time Frame: Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Number of retentional lesions of the face
Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Face lesions
Time Frame: Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Total number of face lesions
Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Trunk lesions
Time Frame: Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Factor F2 of ECLA scale ECLA ("Echelle de Cotation des Lésions d'Acné") is a scale for acne proposed by the dermatology research team of Nantes University Hospital. It is composed of 3 factors: Factor 1 (F1) counts the acne lesions on the face; Factor 2 (F2) counts the lesions acne on the trunk and Factor 3 (F3) counts the scars. In this study, the factor F2 will be used. The factor F2 assesses the extensive character of acne lesions on 5 defined areas: cervical areas (F2N); chest areas (F2C); back area (F2B) and arm area (F2A) according to a qualitative scale 0=absent, 1=poor 2=medium 3=significant. It is completed by the count of the present nodules in each area.
Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12
Relapse
Time Frame: Month 4 and Month 6

number of patients with relapse, defined as follows :

  1. AFAST score 1 (GEA score): increase of 2 points versus score of previous visit, in case of success Or
  2. AFAST score 2 (mandibular score): increase of 1 point versus score of previous visit, in case of success
Month 4 and Month 6
Reappearance of 10% and more of inflammatory lesions.
Time Frame: Month 6
Number of patients with a reappearance of 10% and more of inflammatory lesions.
Month 6
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year, QALY) of the comparison between the spironolactone and cycline.
Time Frame: Month 6
costs: resources consumed, QALY: EQ-5D
Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acne Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on spironolactone

Subscribe