Emergency Medical Services and Epilepsy in Switzerland

November 14, 2017 updated by: Theusinger Oliver M.

Treatment of Epilepsy in Children and Adults in the Emergency Medical Services of the City of Zurich, Switzerland - Midazolam Versus Diazepam - A Retrospective Analysis

Retrospective data analysis, all emergency medical services of the city of Zurich interventions due to epileptic convulsions during June 2013 and December 2014 have been analyzed regarding the type of drug used, its application mode and the application mode based success. Furthermore, children versus adults were compared. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and also presented as median [minimum; maximum]. Groups were compared using the independent samples t-test. P-values < 0.05 are considered significant.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

584

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 99 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

retrospective collected data from the emergency medical system "Schutz & Rettung Zürich", Zurich, Switzerland, over an 18 months period from 01. June 2013 till 31. December 2014 - all calls for epileptic seizures

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • emergency calls for epileptic seizures received by the emergency medical system of Zurich,Switzerland,
  • the use of midazolam or diazepam or no drug used.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the use of any other first line drug to stop seizures than the two mentioned above e.g. thiopental

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Which drug (Midazolam versus Diazepam) better stops epileptic seizures in the pre-clinical setting
Time Frame: follow up up to 1 year

In this retrospective trial, all Emergency Medical Services of the city of Zurich interventions due to epileptic seizures during June 2013 and December 2014 are analyzed regarding the two drugs (Midazolam or Diazepam) used, its application mode (intravenous, nasal, intramuscular, rectal) and the application mode based success. Data will be collected regarding these aspects in order to determine if one drug is better than the other one, and which application mode is the most efficient.

Furthermore, children versus adults are compared. Continuous variables are summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and also presented as median [minimum; maximum]. Groups are compared using the independent samples t-test. P-values < 0.05 are considered significant.

follow up up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Does the way of application of the drugs (Midazolam versus Diazepam) used in pre-clinical epileptic seizures influence the outcome
Time Frame: follow up up to 1 year

In this retrospective trial, all Emergency Medical Services of the city of Zurich interventions due to epileptic seizures during June 2013 and December 2014 are analyzed regarding the two drugs (Midazolam or Diazepam) used, its application mode (intravenous, nasal, intramuscular, rectal) and the application mode based success. Data will be collected regarding these aspects in order to determine if one drug is better than the other one, and which application mode is the most efficient.

Furthermore, children versus adults are compared. Continuous variables are summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and also presented as median [minimum; maximum]. Groups are compared using the independent samples t-test. P-values < 0.05 are considered significant.

follow up up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Oliver M Theusinger, MD, Balgrist University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Subscribe