House Calls and Peer Mentorship (HC+PM)

Comparing the Effectiveness of House Calls and Peer Mentorship to Reduce Racial Disparities in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation

Live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) offers the most optimal survival and quality of life benefit for those with late-stage chronic kidney disease. However, minorities, especially blacks, are much less likely to receive LDKT than whites. Given the shortage of deceased donor organs, interventions expanding access to LDKT are needed, particularly for minority patients. House Calls (HC), an educational intervention developed by this study's PI has been shown to be an effective program for raising rates of live donation, especially for black patients. While the HC program has shown outstanding results, participant feedback suggested that follow-up may provide even more benefits. Previous research suggests that peer mentorship (PM) from former or current patients with ESRD may be effective in raising rates of living donation. As such, peer mentorship programs may act as an effective follow-up for HC participants. This study will examine the impact of the HC intervention combined with the peer mentorship program of the National Kidney Foundation on rates of live donor kidney transplantation.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Chronic Kidney Disease; End-Stage Renal Disease
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: House Call; Behavioral: Peer Mentorship

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 320
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Massachusetts
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
      • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • South Carolina
    • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
      • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Black race (including possible Cape Verdean, Haitian, Dominican)
• ≥18 yrs old
• English speaking
• Meets eligibility criteria for kidney transplant evaluation
• Ability to provide informed consent
• Resides within 1.5 hr drive of HC educator

Exclusion Criteria:

• Temporarily Unavailable (TU) on the waiting list and TU is likely to exceed 6 months based on judgement of kidney transplant team
• Awaiting combined kidney-liver transplantation
• Awaiting simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation
• Participation in another study to increase the likelihood of LDKT
• Prior participation in a transplant HC
• Prior or current participation in the NKF PM program

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care; All enrolled patients will receive Usual Care for transplant candidates at our two centers, which includes individual meetings with transplant providers, attendance at a patient group education session in the transplant center (focused on the specifics of the transplant experience), and a transplant education binder.
Active Comparator: Usual Care (UC) + House Calls (HC); Patients and their invited guests will be scheduled for one House Call. A house call is meeting done at a patient's home with transplant health educators facilitating a discussion on topics related to living kidney donation. Patients and guests also receive an information packet containing several brochures providing information about the living donation process, common concerns and misperceptions, and donation resources and information about our transplant center (e.g., copy of our quarterly newsletter, contact information). Patients in the group will also receive Usual Care, the regular education on living donation, provided as part of their routine transplant care.	Behavioral: House Call; 60 to 90 minute home based educational intervention which will be administered by a health educator.
Experimental: UC + HC + Peer Mentorship; Patients in this condition will receive the Usual Care and the House Calls intervention as described previously. In addition, participants will receive access to a Peer Mentor trained by the National Kidney Foundation following their House Call.	Behavioral: House Call; 60 to 90 minute home based educational intervention which will be administered by a health educator.; Behavioral: Peer Mentorship; A National Kidney Foundation Peer Mentor will be assigned to the participant to provide contact and support to study participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Live donor kidney transplants	The primary outcome for this study is the proportion of enrolled patients with live donor kidney transplants after 1 year.	1 Year Post-Intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Live donor evaluations	A secondary outcome for the study is the proportion of enrolled patients with a live donor evaluation at the one-year endpoint. A live donor evaluation is defined as the completion of a transplant evaluation to determine whether a potential living donor is eligible to donate.	1 Year Post-Intervention
Live donor inquiries	A secondary outcome for the study is proportion of enrolled patients with live donor inquiries at the one-year endpoint. A live donor inquiry is when an individual contacts the transplant center to express interest in living donation, regardless of when they complete the entire live donor evaluation.	1 Year Post-Intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Improvement in live donor kidney transplant knowledge measured through Living Donation Kidney Transplant Knowledge (LDKT-K) scale score	An improvement in patient knowledge is measured by the change in score of a scored instrument, the Living Donation Kidney Transplant Knowledge Scale (LDKT-K). The LDKT-K is a scored true or false questionnaire that tests patient's knowledge on living donation. A higher score indicates that a participant answered more questions correctly.	Baseline, 1 Week Post-Intervention, 6 Weeks Post-Intervention, and 12 Weeks Post-Intervention
Improvement in live donor kidney transplant readiness measured through Living Donation Kidney Transplant Readiness scale (LDKT-R) score	Improvement in patient readiness to pursue LDKT is measured by a scored instrument, the Living Donation Kidney Transplant Readiness Scale (LDKT-R). The LDKT-R is a 5-point scale where patient's self report their readiness to pursue living donation and where in the process they are (i.e., they are beginning to think about living donation, have spoken with potential donors, etc.) A higher score on this assessment indicates greater readiness to pursue LDKT.	Baseline, 1 Week Post-Intervention, 6 Weeks Post-Intervention, and 12 Weeks Post-Intervention
Reduced health care mistrust measured through Health Care Distrust Scale (HCDS) score	Reduction in patient mistrust towards the health care system is measured through a scale, the Health Care Distrust Scale (HCDS). This scale is a 5-point Likert scale that measures the degree of agreement patients have on statements regarding their trust of the medical system. For example, one such statement reads "the health care systems lie to make money." A higher score on this assessment indicates higher levels of mistrust of the health care system.	Baseline, 1 Week Post-Intervention, 6 Weeks Post-Intervention, and 12 Weeks Post-Intervention
Reduced live donor kidney transplant concerns measured through measured Living Donation Kidney Transplant Concerns scale (LDKT-C) score	Patient's concerns towards LDKT is measured using a 5-point scale, the Living Donation Kidney Transplant Concerns scale (LDKT-C) where patients indicate their level of concern towards common concerns patients have regarding living donation. A higher score on this assessment indicates higher levels of concern towards living donation.	Baseline, 1 Week Post-Intervention, 6 Weeks Post-Intervention, and 12 Weeks Post-Intervention
Greater amount of time spent discussing LDKT and higher quality interactions measured through the Talking About Living Donation (TaLKeD) instrument	The time patients speak with others about LDKT and whether these interactions are of higher quality compared to pre-intervention is measured through a self-report instrument, Talking About Living Donation (TaLKeD), that asks the cumulative time patient's spoke with others (family, friends, etc.) about living donation and their perceived quality of these interactions (poor, fair, good, very good, excellent).	Baseline, 1 Week Post-Intervention, 6 Weeks Post-Intervention, and 12 Weeks Post-Intervention
Improvement in self-efficacy discussing LDKT measured through Living Donation Kidney Transplant Self-Efficacy scale (LDKT-SE) score	Patient's self-efficacy towards doing activities to pursue LDKT (e.g. willingness and confidence to approach others for donation, following-up with potential donors) is measured through a self-report instrument, the Living Donation Kidney Transplant Self-Efficacy (LDKT-SE) scale. A higher score on this assessment indicates higher self-efficacy for patients pursuing LDKT.	Baseline, 1 Week Post-Intervention, 6 Weeks Post-Intervention, and 12 Weeks Post-Intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
• Collaborators: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Medical University of South Carolina
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: James R Rodrigue, Ph.D., Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): April 30, 2018
• Primary Completion (Actual): March 31, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): December 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 23, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 21, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): November 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 18, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 14, 2024
• Last Verified: March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: African American; Education; Live Donor Kidney Transplantation; Disparity; LDKT; Patient Support
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Urologic Diseases; Disease Attributes; Renal Insufficiency; Chronic Disease; Female Urogenital Diseases; Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications; Urogenital Diseases; Male Urogenital Diseases; Kidney Diseases; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Kidney Failure, Chronic
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2017P000521; PCORI 1609-36589 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No