MR Imaging of Lung in the Follow-up Assessment of Cystic Fibrosis (CFMR-lung)

June 5, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux
The aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of MRI to detect changes in Helbich-Bhalla scoring over time in patients with cystic fibrosis

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutation and represents one of the most frequent and lethal inherited disease in Caucasian. However, thanks to better treatments that slow down the progression of pulmonary disease, the median life expectancy has reached 41 years and there are nowadays more CF patients older than 18-year-old than younger. Chronic lung disease is the main manifestation and represents more than 90% of CF morbidity and mortality. However, there is a need for biomarkers more sensitive than clinical and functional findings for a personalized management of patients. Computed tomography (CT), owing to its high spatial resolution and contrast, is the standard of reference in imaging for depicting lung structural alterations. But CT is an ionizing technique, rising concern in cancer risk associated to cumulated radiation dose. To date, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a radiation-free technique which has been demonstrated to add meaningful functional information that cannot be reached using CT. Recent advances in 3-dimensional ultra-short echo time (3D-UTE) imaging have been shown promising to improve lung MR imaging quality. A clear delineation between airway wall and lumen was obtained, thanks to submillimeter voxel size, enabling readers to estimate both bronchial thickening and dilatation with very good concordance with CT, independently from the magnitude of score. The combination of pulse sequence may rather benefit from the potential of MRI to get more complete insight into inflammatory processes by combining several contrasts, as compared to other ionizing methods. Novel MR methods have been shown promising in assessing lung changes with high resolution and therefore could be proposed instead of CT for radiation- free repeated, life-long follow-up

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

212

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • University Hospital of Bordeaux
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • University Hospital of Bordeaux
      • Créteil, France, 94010
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor
      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • CHRU de Grenoble
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • CHRU de Lille
      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • Hôpital Nord
      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • Hopital Universitaire de la Timone
      • Nice, France, 06200
        • Fondation Lenval
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Hôpital Armand-Trousseau
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hôpital Necker Enfant Malades
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • CHRU Bretonneau-Tours

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female children (age ≥ 8 y.o) and adult patient with a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis provided by genetic and swear test older than 8 years. Subgroups of patients will be defined according to:

    • age: younger or older 18y.o. We expect around 50% in different subgroups. In case of, we reach 50% in one of these groups, patient recruitment will continue for both groups until the expected number of patients in the study is reached.
    • brand name of magnet: Siemens, General Electric or Philips
  • new drugs use: association Ivacaftor/lumicaftor (OrkambiØ) or Ivacaftor only (Kalydeco Ø) ) We expect approximately 20% to 50% of patients treated
  • Informed consent provided to the patient or/and to legal representative for adults and to parents for the children
  • Patient concerned by articles L 1121-6, L 1121-7, and L 1121-8 (persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, minors, persons of legal age who are the object of a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent) if the expected benefit for such persons justifies the foreseeable risk incurred

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients without any social security or health insurance
  • pregnant women
  • Patients with previous pulmonary transplantation or planned for transplantation in the year following inclusion
  • MRI contraindications:

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lung MRI
lung MRI without contrast injection
lung MRI without contrast injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of MRI to detect lung changes
Time Frame: Month 36
deterioration or improvement measured by the Helbich-Bhalla scoring with CT as gold standard
Month 36

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of MRI to Helbich-Bhalla scoring change
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
Sensitivity of MRI to Helbich-Bhalla scoring change in various subgroups of patients according to age, centers and MR scan manufacturers, and new treatment drug use (Ivacaftor/lumicaftor: Orkambi Ø or Ivacaftor : Kalydeco Ø ) from CT and MR examinations
Month 0 and Month 36
CT / MR concordance
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
Concordance between CT and MR in amplitude of Helbich-Bhalla scoring variations at M0 and M36
Month 0 and Month 36
Sensitivity of the 3D-UTE MR sequence
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
Sensitivity of the 3D-UTE MR sequence alone to detect change in Helbich-Bhalla scoring as compared to CT performed at M0 and M36
Month 0 and Month 36
Imaging quality of the 3D-UTE MR
Time Frame: Month 0, Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36
using a likert scale
Month 0, Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36
Correlation between a specific Helbich-Bhalla MR score and the amplitude of change
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
Correlation between a specific Helbich-Bhalla MR score with clinical and functional data, and concordance with the amplitude of change between M0 and M36
Month 0 and Month 36
Accuracy of a lung MR protocol
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
Accuracy of a lung MR protocol including T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences to diagnose allergic broncho-pulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in CF patients
Month 0 and Month 36
Reproducibility in detecting lung structural abnormality
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
MR and CT reproducibility in detecting lung structural abnormality at the segmental level
Month 0 and Month 36
Reproducibility in overall Helbich-Bhalla scoring
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
MR and CT reproducibility in overall Helbich-Bhalla scoring
Month 0 and Month 36
Correlations between Helbich-Bhalla scoring and clinical questionnaire
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
Correlations between Helbich-Bhalla scoring measured with MRI and CT and clinical questionnaire
Month 0 and Month 36
Correlations between Helbich-Bhalla scoring and exacerbation rate
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
Correlations between Helbich-Bhalla scoring measured with MRI and CT and exacerbation rate
Month 0 and Month 36
Correlations between Helbich-Bhalla scoring and clinical pulmonary functional test
Time Frame: Month 0 and Month 36
Correlations between Helbich-Bhalla scoring measured with MRI and CT and clinical pulmonary functional test
Month 0 and Month 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on lung MRI

Subscribe