- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03360201
An Evaluation of a Family Counseling Intervention ("Tuko Pamoja") in Kenya: a Single Case Series Design
A Formative Study to Develop Culturally Valid Psychosocial Assessment Tools and Interventions to Promote Family Well-Being in Kenya - Part II
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a family counseling intervention, entitled "Tuko Pamoja" (Translation "We are Together" in Kiswahili), using a single case series design.
The intervention, delivered by lay counselors and through existing community social structures, focuses on improving family relationships and mental health with content derived from evidence-based practices; these include solution-focused family therapy and cognitive behavioral strategies. It is components based, with modules delivered based on need. The content and structure has been adapted in both content and implementation model based on formative research in this context. Primary hypotheses include achieving improvements in outcomes related to:
- Family functioning, including elements such as communication, emotional closeness, structure and organization, and satisfaction for the overall family; this also includes indicators of functioning at dyadic levels (i.e., parent-child and couples functioning)
- Mental health of both children and caregivers, including positive well-being, with a particular emphasis on outcomes for children and adolescents.
The investigators also hypothesize feasibility and acceptability based on a previous evaluation of the program and are analyzing community-sourced practices used by lay counselors. Investigators hypothesize that they are integrating locally-grounded strategies that may influence the delivery or outcomes of the intervention.
The study will follow a single case series design with a sample size of 8 families, including up to 3 caregivers per family (who hold primary responsibility for the child whether biological or non-biological) and a target child identified through caregiver-report of the child about whom they are most concerned. This design will allow for tracking changes in outcome variables over time and for linking clinical changes to session content and delivery strategies.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Eve S Puffer, PhD
- Phone Number: 919-381-2494
- Email: eve.puffer@duke.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Uasin Gishu County
-
Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya
- Moi University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Family with self-reported elevated distress (e.g., high levels of conflict) that also has a child/adolescent (ages 8-17) with caregiver-reported emotional or behavioral concerns
Exclusion Criteria:
- Families without reported distress and/or without reported adolescent distress.
- Families with children older than 17 or younger than 8 years of age.
- Families in which primary caregivers or children are living too far outside of the community to participate in treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention: Tuko Pamoja
The intervention, Tuko Pamoja, is delivered by lay counselors and through existing community social structures, focuses on improving family relationships and mental health with content derived from evidence-based practices; these include solution-focused family therapy and cognitive behavioral strategies.
It is components based, with modules delivered based on need.
The content and structure has been adapted in both content and implementation model based on formative research in this context.
Tuko Pamoja includes a smart phone component to support psychoeducation components and data collection.
|
Tuko Pamoja, "We are Together" in Kiswahili; This intervention, delivered by lay counselors and through existing community social structures, focuses on improving family relationships and mental health with content derived from evidence-based practices; these include solution-focused family therapy and cognitive behavioral strategies.
It is components based, with modules delivered based on need.
Tuko Pamoja includes a smart phone component to support psychoeducation components and data collection.
The content and structure has been adapted in both content and implementation model based on formative research in this context.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Family Functioning: Survey Measure (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
30 self-report items developed for the local context based on formative research.
Responses are endorsed on a 10-point scale and refer to the past month.
One composite score is calculated; higher scores reflect better family functioning.
A subset of these are administered repeatedly pre- and post-intervention as part of the single case series design multiple assessments.
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Family Functioning: Direct Observation (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
A direct observational measure in which families complete standardized video-recorded activities.
Behaviors are then coded on multiple domains, including ones related to positive/negative interactions, quality of communication, and problem-solving ability.
Primary analyses will be conducted with higher scores indicating better functioning.
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
Parent-Child Relationship (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Parent-Child Relationship: from standardized scales and locally developed items. Items selected and adapted from: (1) Parental Acceptance and Rejection Questionnaire, (2) Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey: Discipline Module, (3) Discipline Interview, (4) Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale. Each include caregiver and child/adolescent report versions. Caregiver report includes 66 items; Child report includes 60 items. Participants are asked to respond based on the past month. Children report on each caregiver separately. For primary analyses, one composite score will be calculated. For follow-up analyses, subsets of items may be analyzed, including those related specifically to harsh treatment/abuse. A subset of these are administered repeatedly pre- and post-intervention as part of the single case series design multiple assessments. |
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Couples Relationship (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Locally-derived items and selected items adapted from standardized scales: Conflict Tactics Scale; Dyadic Adjustment Scale; additional locally-derived items. A total of 52 items are included, referring to both self and spouse behaviors. The majority of items are based on a frequency scale, referring to the past month; some items related to spousal maltreatment assess whether behaviors have ever occurred. As a primary outcome, responses across these items will be combined into one score. Follow-up analyses may be conducted using subsets of items to assess relationship quality and harsh treatment separately. A subset of these are administered repeatedly pre- and post-intervention as part of the single case series design multiple assessments. |
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Child / Adolescent Mental Health (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Items locally developed and adapted from standardized measures, including the Youth Self Report (YSR) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; for caregivers); locally-developed items assessed local terms reflecting symptoms, hope, prosocial behavior, risk behavior, and sense of belongingness. The majority of items reported on a 3-point scale (Not/Never True, Somewhat/Sometimes True, Very/Often True). Caregiver-report on child included 47 items; Child self-report included 56 items. A single composite score will be calculated, with potential follow-up analyses on subsets of items. A subset of these are administered repeatedly pre- and post-intervention as part of the single case series design multiple assessments. |
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Caregiver Mental Health (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Locally-developed items and items adapted from subscales of standardized measures, including: Patient Health Questionnaire, General Health Questionnaire. Caregivers self-report on 29 total items. One composite score will be calculated, and potential follow-up analyses may examine subsets of items. A subset of these are administered repeatedly pre- and post-intervention as part of the single case series design multiple assessments. |
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Self-defined "Top Problem": Family (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Each participant identifies the two highest priority problems related to their family that they would like the intervention to help with.
Items assess how much each problem has bothered them in the past month.
For repeated measures as part of the single case series design, these are also administered with participants reporting on the past 2-3 days.
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Self-defined "Top Problem": Self (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Each participant identifies the highest priority problem related to themself that they would like the intervention to help with.
An item assesses how much the problem has bothered them in the past month.
For repeated measures as part of the single case series design, these are also administered with participants reporting on the past 2-3 days.
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Self-defined "Top Problem": Child (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Each caregiver identifies the highest priority problem related to their child that they would like the intervention to help with.
An item assesses how much the problem has bothered them in the past month.
For repeated measures as part of the single case series design, these are also administered with participants reporting on the past 2-3 days.
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Counselor Implementation Outcomes
Time Frame: Through study completion
|
This measure will assess feasibility, acceptability, and quality of delivery model. Fidelity (Checklists, session transcript analysis) Lay counselor competency (session transcript ratings; Adapted ENACT), including counselor use of community practices (session transcript analysis) A composite score will be calculated, and follow-up analyses may examine subsets of items dividing fidelity and competency scores. |
Through study completion
|
Material Resources: Household Assets/Consumption (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
This measure includes an inventory of locally-relevant household assets and a measure of consumption and spending.
For repeated measures as part of the single case series design, these are also administered with participants reporting on the past 2-3 days.
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Alcohol Use: Adult (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) and locally-derived items; single items related to associated risk behaviors, such as other substance use, also included. Caregivers self-report on 37 items and spouse-report on 32 items. The majority of items are reported on a frequency Likert scale. Higher scores indicate higher severity. For repeated measures as part of the single case series design, these are also administered with participants reporting on the past 2-3 days. |
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention; repeated measures pre, during, and post intervention up to 4 weeks
|
Adolescent Risk Behavior (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
Sexually active (Yes/No); Sex past month; Condom use; Number partners; Locally-derived items on peer influence related to risky behaviors One risk behavior composite will be calculated, and subsets or single items may be analyzed in follow-up analyses. |
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
Traumatic stress symptoms: Child/Adolescent (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
CRIES (Children's Revised Impact of Events Scale), self-reported experience of traumatic stress symptoms over the past week; 8 items (frequency scale).
Higher scores indicate higher severity.
(These items will be administered if a child endorses 1 or more experiences on the UCLA trauma exposure scale, self-reported experience of traumatic events; 16 items(yes/no)).
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
Parent-Child Communication: Sex/HIV-Related (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
Survey items assessing frequency (6 items) and quality (6 items) of sex/HIV-related communication.
Higher scores indicate better communication.
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
Extended family relationships (Change over time)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
Locally-derived items on quality of relationships with both maternal and paternal extended family members, including positive and negative interactions, as well as any financial or logistical support received.
Items are rated on a scale of 1-10.
Caregivers report on 10 items; Children report on 6 items.
Higher scores indicate better relationships.
|
Baseline and 1 month post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eve S Puffer, PhD, Duke University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- C0058
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Child Abuse
-
Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western NorwayOral Health Center of Expertise Rogaland, Norway; Childrens advocacy center... and other collaboratorsRecruitingChild Abuse | Child Neglect | Child MaltreatmentNorway
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Active, not recruiting
-
Yeditepe UniversityRecruitingEducational Program's Impact on Nursing Students' Knowledge and Awareness of Child Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse | Child NeglectTurkey
-
Karolinska InstitutetActive, not recruitingChild Abuse | Child MaltreatmentSweden
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedChild Abuse | Child NeglectUnited States
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterRecruitingChild Abuse | Child Neglect | Child MaltreatmentUnited States
-
University of ChicagoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Oak Foundation; UBS Optimus Foundation; Trickle... and other collaboratorsCompletedChild Abuse | Child MaltreatmentBurkina Faso
-
University of PittsburghPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Northwell Health; University of...CompletedChild Abuse | Trauma | Child Maltreatment | Physical AbuseUnited States
-
McGill UniversitySave the Children; European Network of Foundations Children and Violence Evaluation... and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
Institute of Psychiatry, LondonBanaras Hindu University; Tribhuvan University, NepalCompletedChild Abuse | Child Neglect | VictimizationIndia, Nepal
Clinical Trials on Tuko Pamoja, "We are Together" in Kiswahili
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterJohns Hopkins University; Brown University; University of Southern California; Weill... and other collaboratorsRecruitingBreast Cancer | Rare CancerUnited States