Fidgety Movements in Cystic Fibrosis

July 22, 2019 updated by: Akmer Mutlu, Hacettepe University

Fidgety Movements Analysis in Infants With Cystic Fibrosis

Very low birth weight infants who are at risk for chronic lung diseases may also be at risk for brain anomalies such as increased echogenicity, leukomalacia and intracranial hemorrhage. Infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia have been reported to have worse neurodevelopmental outcomes than healthy infants. It has also been pointed out that babies with prolonged and recurrent apneas during sleep may have weak General Movements (GMs) repertoire.

It has been mentioned that motor development retardation may also occur in neurodevelopmental diseases, genetic diseases and chronic lung diseases, as well as in cystic fibrosis. In infants with cystic fibrosis, motor development may be affected by increased incidence of hospitalization, previous infections, malnutrition, respiratory and digestive system disorders. There is no research done with GMs assessment to determine motor dysfunction in infants with cystic fibrosis and this topic is open to research.

Having more information about the motor development of babies by determining the motor characteristics and motor performance of infants with cystic fibrosis, it may be possible to start the disease-specific physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs as early as possible. For this reasons, in the study the investigators aimed to investigate the characteristics of GMs in the "Fidgety" period of 3-5 month term infants diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, to determine the motor performances and to investigate the relation between the GMs characteristics and the features of the disease.

The hypotheses the investigators have set for this study are listed below;

Ho: Spontaneous movements of the "Fidgety" period of infants diagnosed with 3-5 months of cystic fibrosis are not different from normal infants.

H1: Spontaneous movements of "Fidgety" period of infants diagnosed with cystic fibrosis between 3-5 months are different from normal infants.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Departmant of Pyhsiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 5 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Postterm 3-5 months of cystic fibrosis diagnosed and postterm 3-5 months healthy infants will be included to the study. The number of individuals to be included in the cystic fibrosis group was determined as 19 according to the power analysis at α = 0.05 and β = 0.20 (for 80% power). Within the scope of our study, the control group, which will be formed from postpartum 3-5 month healthy infants, will be composed of our patients who have been taken to the rehabilitation sessions of our clinic on the given days as well as our patients who have been in control for a certain period of time at Hacettepe University Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, relatives.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with cystic fibrosis
  • Being between the postterm 3rd and 5th months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having congenital anomalies,
  • Having an ongoing infection,
  • Risk of high or low neurological impairment due to perinatal stroke, perinatal asphyxia, intra / peri-ventricular hemorrhage (IVH / PVL), bronchopulmonary dysplasia,
  • Fidgety movements evaluation results; being abnormal (AF), sporadic (F +/-) or non-F (F-)
  • Baby's family does not want to be involved in the work

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control Group
GMs assessment has been increasingly used to predict motor dysfunction, especially the Cerebral Palsy (SP), since its introduction 25 years ago. The GMs assessment is based on the visual holistic perception of normal and abnormal movements of the body. This approach focuses on spontaneous movements of the baby rather than reflexes, tonus, and reactions
Cystic Fibrosis Group
GMs assessment has been increasingly used to predict motor dysfunction, especially the Cerebral Palsy (SP), since its introduction 25 years ago. The GMs assessment is based on the visual holistic perception of normal and abnormal movements of the body. This approach focuses on spontaneous movements of the baby rather than reflexes, tonus, and reactions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Optimality Score (MOS)
Time Frame: 45 minute for each patient

The MOS has a max. value of 28 (for the best possible performance) and a min. value of 5. The score sheet comprises the following five sub-categories: fidgety movements, age-adequacy of motor repertoire, quality of movement patterns other than fidgety movements, posture, and overall quality of the motor repertoire.

  1. Fidgety Movements; normal fidgety: 12 points, abnormal fidgety: 4 points and sporadic fidgety: 1 points
  2. Age-adequacy of motor repertoire; normal motor repertoire: 4 points, decreased motor repertoire: 2 points, non age-adequacy of motor repertoire: 1 points
  3. Quality of movement patterns other than fidgety movements; normal movement patterns: 4 points, equal normal and abnormal movement patterns: 2 points, abnormal movement patterns: 1 points
  4. Posture; normal posture: 4 points, equal normal and abnormal posture: 2 points, abnormal posture: 1 points
  5. Overall quality of the motor repertoire; normal: 4 points, abnormal: 2 points, cramped-synchronized: 1 points
45 minute for each patient

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Observational General Movements Assessments

Subscribe