Different Positive Pressure Strategies in COPD Patients.

July 30, 2018 updated by: Catarina Souza Ferreira Rattes Lima, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Regional Ventilation and Radioaerosol Pulmonary Deposition Through Different Positive Pressure Strategies in COPD Patients.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by a poorly reversible airway obstruction and consequent systemic manifestations. Its high prevalence and high number of diagnosed patients has become a challenge for health services due to the costs of diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Positive pressure and aerosol therapy are preferred therapies for the management of COPD symptoms, but their effects when associated are poorly studied. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of different positive pressure strategies associated with aerosol therapy through Pulmonary Scintigraphy and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in patients with COPD in the intercrise period. This is a randomized, crossover, blinded and allocated crossover type clinical trial in which patients with moderate to severe COPD will be allocated to three intervention groups with different strategies for positive pressure associated with aerosol therapy: control group 1 nebulization), group 2 nebulization with EPAP valve and group 3 nebulization with NIV bi-level pressure mode. The radioaerosol deposition pattern will be evaluated through Pulmonary Scintigraphy and regional pulmonary ventilation through EIT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pernambuco
      • Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, 50670-901
        • Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with stage II (moderate) and III (severe) COPD according to the guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to understand or perform procedures that present rheumatic or orthopedic diseases or deformities / abnormalities in the spine that compromise the mechanics of the respiratory system; respiratory comorbidities such as asthma, bronchiectasis and sequela of tuberculosis, cardiovascular and neurological comorbidities; hemodynamic instability defined as heart rate greater than 150 bpm, or systolic pressure less than 90 mmHg; hypertension (blood pressure> 149/89 mmHg) or hypotension (blood pressure <90/60 mmHg) at the time of collection; pregnancy or suspected pregnancy; and any contraindications for the use of PEP.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nebulization
control intervention, will only perform nebulization;
For inhalation of the radioaerosol a dose of DTPA-Tc99m (methionine-labeled diethylnitriaminepentaacetic acid) with 1mCi activity, associated with 10 drops of Fenoterol Bromide and 20 drops of Ipatropium Bromide diluted for a total of up to 3 ml of saline solution 0.9%. A MESH vibrating nebulizer (NIVO, Philips Respironics, Murrysville, Pennsylvania) will be used.
Experimental: Positive expiratory pressure valve
Intervention, will perform nebulization associated with positive expiratory pressure valve in the airways (EPAP)
For nebulization associated with the EPAP valve will be used a non-invasive distribution system consisting of a non-toxic orofacial mask connected to a spring loaded EPAP valve. This mask will be secured to the patient's face through tabs in order to prevent leakage and to maintain proper pressurizing and better patient adaptation.
Experimental: Nonivasive ventilation
intervention, will perform nebulization associated with non-invasive ventilation Bi-level mode;
For nebulization associated with NIV, a noninvasive distribution system consisting of a non-toxic orofacial mask connected to the NIV circuit will be used, and the latter will be being fed by a radioaerosol flow generated by a nebulizer coupled to the circuit. This mask will be secured to the patient's face through tabs in order to prevent leakage and to maintain proper pressurizing and better patient adaptation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Pulmonary Function
Time Frame: 30 minutes after intervention
Pulmonary function test performed through spirometry
30 minutes after intervention
Change of Aerosol deposition in the lungs
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention
The pulmonary deposition index (PPI), expressed in percentage terms and obtained by the ratio of the number of counts of each ROI to the total number of counts of the respective lung.
Immediately after intervention
Change of Regional pulmonary ventilation
Time Frame: 30 minutes after intervention
The impedance variation (AZ) and regional pulmonary ventilation (ZEE) will be evaluated for each region of interest.
30 minutes after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Ventilatory pattern
Time Frame: 30 minutes after intervention
Respiratory rate, tidal volume, minute volume, inspiratory time, expiratory time, and total time.
30 minutes after intervention
Change of Heart Rate
Time Frame: 30 minutes after intervention
Heart Rate
30 minutes after intervention
Change of Peripheral Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: Immediately and 30 minutes after intervention
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation
Immediately and 30 minutes after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Catarina Rattes, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 16, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Nebulization

Subscribe