Effects of Whole-body Vibration Exercise in Brain Injury Patients With Minimally Conscious State

September 19, 2019 updated by: Samsung Medical Center

Effects of Whole-body Vibration Exercise on Cortical Activity and Consciousness Level in Brain Injury Patients With Minimally Conscious State: Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the whole body vibration exercise on cortical activity and consciousness Level in brain injury patients with minimally conscious state.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Whole body vibration exercise can provide proper somatosensory stimulation and improve muscle strength and postural control. However, there has not yet been a report on the cortical activity changes induced by whole body vibration exercise in brain injury patients with minimally conscious state.

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups. One group will go through whole body vibration with exercise and the other will only perform exercise. The primary outcome measurement of this study was cerebral cortex activity based on changes in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Behavioral assessment were performed using the coma recovery scale-revised and modified ashworth scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose consciousness level was assessed as minimally conscious state by traumatic brain injury, stroke, and hypoxic brain injury
  • Patients who had more than 3 months after brain injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age and older patients over 80 years
  • Pregnant women
  • In cases of uncontrolled internal or external disease
  • Patients with severe heart, musculoskeletal problems and disabilities, and those with severe neurological lesions prior to brain injury
  • Acute or chronic venous thrombosis or hemorrhage
  • Person wearing an implant on the spine
  • People with severe osteoporosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Exercise only group
The control group performed the same session without vibration.
Exercise maintain a half-squat position (knee joint angle at 160 degrees) on the tilt table with an incline of 60 degrees.
Experimental: Whole body vibration group
Whole body vibration group performed five sessions of whole body vibration exercise via a vibrating platform (Galileo® Advanced Plus, Novotec Medical, Pforzheim, Germany) with a magnitude of 20 Hz and an amplitude of 4 mm.
Whole body vibration exercise is a stimulus that uses vibrations generated on a machine with oscillatory movement determined by the amplitude and frequency of the vibration.
Exercise maintain a half-squat position (knee joint angle at 160 degrees) on the tilt table with an incline of 60 degrees.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebral cortex activity
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 6 (at approximately 6 days); at 2 weeks (follow-up)
Cerebral cortex activity was measured based on changes in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration using fNIRS
session 0 (initial visit); session 6 (at approximately 6 days); at 2 weeks (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 6 (at approximately 6 days); at 2 weeks (follow-up)

assess patients with a disorder of consciousness, commonly coma

The CRS-R consists of 23 items, grouped into 6 sub-scales:

  1. .Auditory
  2. Visual
  3. Motor
  4. Oromotor
  5. Communication
  6. Arousal The lowest score on each sub-scale represents reflexive activity; the highest represents behaviors mediated by cognitive input.

The total score ranges between 0 (worst) and 23 (best). This measure takes a minimum of 25 minutes to complete.

session 0 (initial visit); session 6 (at approximately 6 days); at 2 weeks (follow-up)
Modified Ashworth scale
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 6 (at approximately 6 days); at 2 weeks (follow-up)

measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity The Ashworth scale is one of the most widely used methods of measuring spasticity, due in a large part to the simplicity and reproducible method.

0: No increase in muscle tone Grade Description

  1. Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM
  2. More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
  3. Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
  4. Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
session 0 (initial visit); session 6 (at approximately 6 days); at 2 weeks (follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries

Clinical Trials on Whole body vibration

3
Subscribe