Comparison of Two Silicone Hydrogel Toric Contact Lenses

January 7, 2019 updated by: Alcon Research

Axis Orientation Comparison of Two Silicone Hydrogel Toric Contact Lenses

The purpose of this research study is to compare the performance of two different types of Alcon soft toric study contact lenses to obtain information on study lens orientation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Johns Creek, Georgia, United States, 30097
        • Alcon Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Successful wear of soft contact lenses for vision correction in both eyes during the past 3 months for a minimum of 3 days per week and 8 hours per day
  • Astigmatism
  • Requires contact lenses
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any eye condition that contraindicates contact lens wear, as determined by the Investigator
  • Any eye surgery that contraindicates contact lens wear, as determined by the Investigator
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: AOHG toric, then AO toric
Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE, followed by lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses, as randomized. Each product worn in both eyes for approximately 30 minutes, with a 30-45 minute washout between the removal of Pair 1 and insertion of Pair 2.
Silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses for astigmatism
Other Names:
  • AIR OPTIX® plus HYDRAGLYDE® for Astigmatism contact lenses
  • AOHG for Astigmatism
Silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses for astigmatism
Other Names:
  • AIR OPTIX® for Astigmatism contact lenses
  • AO for Astigmatism
Other: AO toric, then AOHG toric
Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses, followed by lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE, as randomized. Each product worn in both eyes for approximately 30 minutes, with a 30-45 minute washout between the removal of Pair 1 and insertion of Pair 2.
Silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses for astigmatism
Other Names:
  • AIR OPTIX® plus HYDRAGLYDE® for Astigmatism contact lenses
  • AOHG for Astigmatism
Silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses for astigmatism
Other Names:
  • AIR OPTIX® for Astigmatism contact lenses
  • AO for Astigmatism

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Lenses With Axis Orientation Within ±30 Degrees From the 90 Degree Axis (Ideal Location)
Time Frame: Day 1, 10 minutes after lens insertion, each product
Each lens was classified based on whether the absolute difference between the axis location and 90° was less than or equal to 30° (ie, lens axis located between the 60° and 120° axis inclusive). Inferential testing was not planned for this primary effectiveness endpoint.
Day 1, 10 minutes after lens insertion, each product

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alcon, A Novartis Division, Alcon, A Novartis Division

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CLC127-C001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Astigmatism

Clinical Trials on Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE

3
Subscribe