US-MR Image Fusion-guided Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

April 2, 2018 updated by: Limin Rong, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

US-MR Image Fusion-guided Versus Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Comparative Cohort Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of US-MR image fusion-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common pathological process leading to spinal surgery. Open discectomy used to be a widespread procedure for surgical treatment for symptomatic LDH. Currently, with rapid progress of endoscopic techniques, several minimal invasive endoscopic surgeries have been developed to perform discectomy. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) a widely used minimal invasive surgical procedures, the effectiveness of which has been proved to be comparable to conventional open discectomy. However, the use of fluoroscopy may be usually required to indirectly visualize pertinent anatomy to achieve an optimal result on radiographs. As we known, increased radiation exposure may be associated with potential stochastic and deterministic adverse events. Therefore, it is important to reduce the radiation dose of practitioners to minimize risk of potential radiation-induced complications.

Ultrasound-MR fusion technique combines the advantages of ultrasound and MR, and overcome the shortcomings of each single imaging method. It provides MR cross-sectional multiplanar images that correspond to the acquired real-time US images, and all images can be displayed simultaneously and in real time according to the angle of the US transducer. US-MR fusion image has been widely used in prostate and liver intervention. However, to our limited knowledge, there is only one research about the application of US-MR fusion image in lumbar spinal surgery.

In this study, a comparative cohort study will be performed to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of US-MR image fusion-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH). We will conduct the study at the 3rd affiliated hospitals of Sun Yat-Sen University.

Two groups of patients will be investigated: patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation undergoing US-MR image fusion-guided PTED (US-MR PTED), and fluoroscopy-guided PTED (FL PTED).

The primary outcomes of the study will be radiation exposure and puncture time. Secondary outcomes include fusion efficacy, puncture accuracy, puncture satisfaction of surgeon, comfort of patient and clinical effectiveness.

On the basis of the results of this trial we will, for the first time, have scientific evidence as to the feasibility and efficacy of US-MR image fusion-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510630
        • Recruiting
        • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. persistent radicular pain.
  2. an imaging study (MRI or CT) showing LDH at a level and side corresponding to the patient
  3. single responsible segment of lumbar disc herniation
  4. L4-5 segment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cauda equina syndrome or progressive neurologic deficit requiring urgent surgical intervention
  2. Combination with other spinal disorder requiring advanced surgery (such as lumbar stenosis, spondylolisthesis, deformity, fracture, infection, tumor and so on)
  3. Equal to or more than two responsible level
  4. Previous spinal surgery
  5. unable to collaborate during surgery
  6. far-lateral disc herniation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: US-MR image fusion-guided PTED
US-MR image fusion-guided PTED: the puncture procedure during PTED was performed under the guidance of ultrasound-MR fusion technique.
patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation undergoing US-MR image fusion-guided PTED
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: fluoroscopy-guided PTED
fluoroscopy-guided PTED: the puncture procedure during PTED was performed under the guidance of fluoroscopy.
patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation undergoing fluoroscopy-guided PTED

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
radiation exposure
Time Frame: during operation
dose of radiation exposure
during operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
puncture accuracy
Time Frame: during operation
the accuracy of puncture position confirmed by fluoroscopy.
during operation
puncture satisfaction of surgeon
Time Frame: during operation
use Visual Analog Scales (VAS,scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more satisfactory) to evaluate the satisfaction of surgeon during puncture
during operation
comfort of patient
Time Frame: during operation
use Visual Analog Scales (VAS,scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more comfortable) to evaluate the comfort of patient during puncture
during operation
degree of pain
Time Frame: preoperation, immediately postoperation, 1 week postoperation
Visual Analog Scales (VAS, scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain)
preoperation, immediately postoperation, 1 week postoperation
degree of disability
Time Frame: preoperation, immediately postoperation, 1 week postoperation
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disability related to pain)
preoperation, immediately postoperation, 1 week postoperation
puncture time
Time Frame: during operation
the time from the begin of puncture to the confirmation of optimal puncture
during operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • US-MR guided PTED for LDH

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Herniated Disc

Clinical Trials on US-MR image fusion-guided PTED

Subscribe