- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03409328
Understanding and Reducing HIV Risk Behavior and Substance Use Among Self-identified Bisexual Adolescent Men
August 16, 2024 updated by: Brian A. Feinstein, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV.
Despite this burden, most HIV prevention interventions target adult MSM (most of whom identify as gay) and heterosexual youth, creating an urgent need for interventions for gay and bisexual adolescents.
Further, self-identified bisexual men, especially adolescents, have been neglected in research.
Therefore, little is known about factors that drive engagement in risk behavior among self-identified bisexual adolescent men.
The goals of this study are to: (1) examine factors that drive engagement in HIV risk behavior and substance use among self-identified bisexual adolescent men; and (2) develop and pilot test a tailored HIV and substance use prevention intervention for this population.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV.
Despite this burden, most HIV prevention interventions target adult MSM (most of whom identify as gay) and heterosexual youth, creating an urgent need for interventions for gay and bisexual adolescents.
Further, self-identified bisexual men, especially adolescents, have been neglected in research.
This is a critical problem because: (1) there are as many, if not more, bisexual adolescent men than gay adolescent men; (2) bisexual adolescent men engage in several HIV risk behaviors more than their gay peers; (3) bisexual adolescent men are at increased risk for substance use-a robust risk factor for HIV; and (4) bisexual men face unique HIV prevention issues.
Given that bisexual men are rarely included in research and most existing research on them focuses on "behaviorally bisexual" adult men, little is known about factors that drive engagement in risk behavior among self-identified bisexual adolescent men.
Attending to bisexual identity is critical to reducing HIV and substance use, because bisexuality is highly stigmatized and stigma-related stressors (e.g., concerns about disclosing one's bisexual identity) impact sexual behavior, substance use, and healthcare utilization.
Interventions are also more effective when tailored to populations, underscoring the need for an intervention for self-identified bisexual adolescent men.
The goals of this study are to: (1) examine factors that drive engagement in HIV risk behavior and substance use among self-identified bisexual adolescent men; and (2) develop and pilot test a tailored HIV and substance use prevention intervention for this population.
In Phase 1, interviews will be conducted with 60 diverse self-identified bisexual adolescent men ages 14-17 focused on sexual identity, sexual decision-making, substance use motivations, and intervention preferences/barriers.
In Phase 2, a tailored intervention will be developed using findings from Phase 1.
In Phase 3, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy will be tested in a pilot randomized trial (N = 60) with a waitlist control and one-month follow-up.
In sum, self-identified bisexual adolescent men are at increased risk for HIV and substance use, but little is known about factors that drive their engagement in risk behavior.
By focusing on self-identified bisexual adolescent men-an underrepresented, health disparity population-this study can identify prevention targets and reduce disparities in HIV and substance use.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
North Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60064
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years to 17 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 14-17
- Identifies as male
- Identifies as bisexual or another non-monosexual identity (e.g., pansexual)
- HIV-negative (self-report)
- Fluent in English
- Lives in United States
Exclusion Criteria:
- Does not meet inclusion criteria
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HIV and substance use prevention
Participants in the intervention condition will receive an HIV and substance use prevention program for self-identified bisexual adolescent men.
The intervention content will be developed through formative research during the initial phase of the study.
|
The intervention content will be developed through formative research during the initial phase of the study.
However, the intervention will address: bisexual-inclusive sexual health education, unique influences of risk behavior among bisexual adolescents, and skills to cope with bisexual stigma and to increase acceptance of one's bisexual identity.
|
|
No Intervention: Waitlist
The control condition will be a waitlist.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention
Time Frame: Up to 2 months (participants in the intervention condition had 1-month to complete the intervention and the follow-up assessment was 1-month later; participants in the control condition waited for 1-month and then completed the follow-up assessment).
|
Retention from enrollment through the 1-month follow-up assessment.
|
Up to 2 months (participants in the intervention condition had 1-month to complete the intervention and the follow-up assessment was 1-month later; participants in the control condition waited for 1-month and then completed the follow-up assessment).
|
|
Acceptability
Time Frame: Post-intervention
|
Acceptability was measured with an adapted version of the Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile.
Scores ranged from 0-4.
Higher scores represent greater acceptability.
|
Post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
HIV Knowledge
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
|
Participants were asked 12 true/false questions to assess their HIV knowledge.
Values ranged from 0-12.
Higher scores represent greater HIV knowledge.
|
1-month follow-up
|
|
Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Knowledge
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
|
Participants were asked 12 true/false questions to assess their STI knowledge.
Scores ranged from 0-12.
Higher scores represent greater STI knowledge.
|
1-month follow-up
|
|
Condom Use Intentions
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
|
Participants were asked eight questions to assess their intentions to use condoms.
Scores ranged from 1-4.
Higher scores represent greater condom use intentions.
|
1-month follow-up
|
|
Condom Use Self-efficacy
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
|
Participants were asked eight or nine questions to assess their condom use self-efficacy (cisgender participants received one question that transgender participants did not receive).
Scores ranged from 1-7.
Higher scores represent greater condom use self-efficacy.
|
1-month follow-up
|
|
Internalized Stigma and Identity Affirmation
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
|
Internalized stigma and identity affirmation were measured with the Bisexual Identity Inventory.
Scores ranged from 1-7.
Higher scores represent greater internalized stigma or identity affirmation.
|
1-month follow-up
|
|
Condomless Sex
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
|
Participants were asked a series of questions about their sexual activity and condom use from the HIV-Risk Assessment for Sexual Partnerships.
Condomless sex (anal or vaginal) was treated as a dichotomous variable (0 = none, 1 = any).
|
1-month follow-up
|
|
Substance Use
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
|
Participants were asked a series of questions about their alcohol and drug use.
Outcomes included binge drinking and marijuana use.
Outcomes were dichotomous (any vs. none).
|
1-month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brian A Feinstein, PhD, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 11, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 31, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
January 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 23, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
January 24, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 22, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 16, 2024
Last Verified
August 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 9481383
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Investigators can contact the PI to discuss potential use of the data for purposes other than those specified in the specific aims.
These requests will be considered by the PI on a case-by-case basis to ensure that all investigators are qualified and that the data will be used in a responsible and ethical manner.
If the data are shared, a data sharing agreement will be developed and all shared data will be de-identified.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Completed
-
University of Massachusetts, BostonCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityJanssen Services, LLCCompleted
-
ViiV HealthcareJohns Hopkins University; Pfizer; Vanderbilt University; University of North Carolina...Completed
-
Medical College of WisconsinCompleted
-
Emory UniversityCompleted
-
Rhode Island HospitalUnknown
-
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, IrelandCompleted
-
Lampiris, Harry W., M.D.AbbottUnknown
Clinical Trials on HIV and substance use prevention
-
Hunter College of City University of New YorkCompletedSubstance Use | Sexual RiskUnited States
-
Arizona State UniversityNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)TerminatedDiet Modification | Parenting | Substance Use Disorders | Cardiovascular Risk Factor | Lifestyle Risk Reduction | Diabetes Mellitus RiskUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
Hunter College of City University of New YorkNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
West China HospitalCompletedPreoperative Screen for Substance Abuse in in Patients Undergoing Emergency OperationChina
-
University of Central FloridaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)TerminatedHIV | Substance Use Disorder (SUD)United States
-
Wayne State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Loyola University ChicagoCompletedHIV Infections | Substance Use Disorders | Social Stigma | Physician-Patient RelationsUnited States
-
RANDNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedAlcohol Consumption | Drug AbuseUnited States
-
Texas Christian UniversityCompletedSubstance Use DisordersUnited States
-
Moi UniversityIndiana UniversityNot yet recruiting