Evaluation of an Automatic Segmentation Software (Pixyl.Neuro) to Track Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Via Cerebral MRI (PIXCIS)

February 6, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Using an automatic software tool, Pixyl.Neuro, to conduct a retrospective analysis (detection of lesions + segmentation of images + tracking over time) of cerebral MRI images acquired during a prospective study of patients presenting with clinically isolated syndrome, and comparing the results against manual analysis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CHU Nimes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 56 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subset of patient data collected for the project D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166

Description

Identical to those of the study D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is available for 24 months of follow-up
  • The patient has had a classic CIS with the past 90 days
  • Reference cerebro-medullary MRI scheduled within the 90 days after the beginning of symptoms
  • With MRI (cerebro ± medullary) showing demyelination according to spatial spread criteria by Swanton (2006):
  • At least 1 lesion in at least 2 of the 4 following territories: (1) Peri-ventricular; (2) Juxta-cortical; (3) Sub-tentorial; (4) Medullary
  • No other suspected pathology
  • Vitamin D level in blood less than 100 nmol / l at the pre-inclusion visit
  • Women of childbearing potential must use very effective contraception for the duration of the study. A very effective contraceptive method is defined as a method resulting in a low failure rate (that is to say less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, IUDs, sexual abstinence, or partner with a vasectomy.

Randomisation stratification criteria:

• The patient can also also meet the temporal dissemination criteria defined according to McDonald criteria 2010 (Polman et al., 2011), because this condition is currently not sufficient for prescribing a background treatment: Simultaneous presence of at least one asymptomatic lesion taking on contrast and at least one asymptomatic lesion not taking on contrast after injection of gadolinium

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another study other than D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166 (this criteria does not apply to the POLAR study (RCB 2011-A01269-32); patients included in this study may simultaneously participate in the POLAR study)
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • Major medical or psychiatric illness that, according to the investigator, would result in the patient running an unnecessary risk or that could affect compliance with the study protocol
  • Vitamin D insufficiency linked to currently active digestive or more general diseases (celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal bypass, short bowel syndrome, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, hyperthyroidism, rickets, hypoparathyroidism, cancer, granulomatous diseases and lymphomas)
  • Moderate or severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance less than 60 ml / min)
  • Epilepsy not adequately controlled by treatment
  • Any illness requiring chronic treatment with corticosteroids
  • Patient with osteoporosis or history of osteopenia
  • Pathology requiring calcium intakes greater than 1 gram per day
  • Current or past history of hypercalcemia
  • Medications that affect the metabolism of vitamin D other than corticosteroids; e.g. anticonvulsants [phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin] rifampicin, isoniazid, ketoconazole, 5-FU and leucovorin, thiazide diuretics.
  • Situations accompanied by increased vulnerability to hypercalcemia, e.g. arrhythmia or known heart disease, treatment with digitalis, and subjects with nephrolithiasis.
  • Contraindications to vitamin D3 as mentioned in the documentation for UVEDOSE
  • Known hypersensitivity to gadolinium and / or known inability to undergo an MRI (pacemaker, osteosynthesis material, intraocular metal splinter, etc ....).
  • The subject is participating in an interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with multiple sclerosis
Pixyl.Neuro software versus manual analysis of lesions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lesions detected by Pixyl.Neuro software that were missed by manual analysis of MRI images follow-up images compared to reference image (new T2 lesions, enlarging T2 lesions, new T1 gadolinium lesions)
Time Frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
% cases
baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inter-reader reproducibility
Time Frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
DICE similarity coefficient between readers
baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Software versus manual analysis reproducibility for same reader
Time Frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
DICE similarity coefficient between software result and manual result
baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Classification of discordances
Time Frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Specific description of missed lesions according to technology at fault
baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 2, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 6, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 6, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation software

Subscribe