Hemodynamic Optimization During Single Kidney Transplantation With MostcareUP

January 2, 2019 updated by: Alessandro De Cassai, University of Padova

There are currently no clear recommendations on hemodynamic targets during kidney transplantation and most anesthesiologists rely on empiric or obsolete parameters such as CVP.

The aim of this study is to investigate hemodynamic management of these patients applying a new generation of advanced monitoring systems such as MOSTCAREUP which can potentially provide a clear overview of the circulatory status beat by beat and to adjust fluid therapy in every single patient or clinical condition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Renal transplantation is actually considered the optimal elective treatment for end stage kidney disease.

Successful renal transplantation involves the optimization of several parameters. Previous studies have suggested that perioperative hemodynamic factors influence immediate and long-term graft survival.

Perioperative hemodynamic management of this kind of surgery is nowadays focused on optimization of fluid therapy concerning both the donor and the graft and their interaction. Postoperative graft function is not exclusively determined by donor and graft characteristics. Several studies over the last 30 years indeed demonstrated that hemodynamic status of the recipient during kidney transplant surgery relates to graft function and proper management of balancing fluid plays a critical role through maintaining optimal blood volume and so assure an adequate supply of oxygen to the tissues.

Aggressive expansion of the intravascular volume during transplantation surgery has been recommended by most previous studies supporting the so called "liberal" approach to fluid management suggesting that a massive intravascular volume expansion was necessary improve renal blood flow and minimize hypoperfusion caused tissue damages. Nowadays it is clear that adequate early graft function requires perfusion of the transplanted kidney, which may be enhanced by expansion of the intravascular volume in the recipient. However, some studies have reported that aggressive intraoperative volume expansion is not always warranted in kidney transplantation and can expose patients with preexistent cardiac disease or poor myocardial function to the risk of fluid overload, acute respiratory failure, and prolonged ventilation. Moreover fluid overload has been demonstrated to be harmful even for graft perfusion, microcirculation and tissue oxygen delivery.

There are currently no clear recommendations on hemodynamic targets during kidney transplantation and most anesthesiologists rely on empiric or obsolete parameters such as CVP.

The aim of this study is to investigate hemodynamic management of these patients applying a new generation of advanced monitoring systems such as MOSTCAREUP which can potentially provide a clear overview of the circulatory status beat by beat and to adjust fluid therapy in every single patient or clinical condition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Veneto
      • Padova, Veneto, Italy, 35127
        • University of Padova

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Written informed consent Renal transplantation candidate

Exclusion Criteria:

Double kidney transplantation Living donor kidney transplantation Hystory of heart failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MOSTCARE UP
Clinician will be able to read MOSTCARE parameters and to choose the best treatment to adequate hemodynamics considering that current literature suggests a fluid IV expansion only if PPV > 12%
Clinician will be able to read MOSTCARE parameters and to choose the best treatment to adequate hemodynamics considering that current literature suggests a fluid IV expansion only if PPV > 12%
No Intervention: CLINICIAN EXPERIENCE
Fluid replacement will be made based on clinician experience

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urine output in the first hour post unclamping (ml) in the two groups
Time Frame: first hour post unclamping during kydney transplanation
Urine output in the first hour post unclamping (ml) in the two groups
first hour post unclamping during kydney transplanation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1) Urine output in the first 24h (ml)
Time Frame: 24hour
1) Urine output in the first 24h (ml)
24hour
2) Need for haemodialysis in the first week (% of patients)
Time Frame: 7 days
2) Need for haemodialysis in the first week (% of patients)
7 days
3) First week creatinine and urea trend in the two groups
Time Frame: 7 days
3) First week creatinine and urea trend in the two groups
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4423/AO/18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

All datas will be probably shared at the end of the study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transplant Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Fluid replacement based on MOSTCARE up

3
Subscribe