Easing Psychosocial Burden for Informal Caregivers

March 29, 2024 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Improving Palliative Care of Caregivers of Patients With Glioblastoma

The overall goal of this study is to determine the best time to offer Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (MCP), an intervention that has proven to be helpful in improving spiritual well-being and decreasing existential distress among patients with advanced cancer, to caregivers. (MCP has also been shown to be an appropriate method of attending to the palliative or comfort care needs of caregivers of patients with cancer. Studies show that the psychological burden associated with caring for a patient with advanced cancer is often greater than that experienced by the patients themselves.) The investigators would also like to find out about caregivers initial impressions of MCP-C, Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers, so that the intervention can be adjusted to meet the unique needs of caregivers of patients with Glioblastoma.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Commack, New York, United States, 11725
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Commack (Consent only)
      • Harrison, New York, United States, 10604
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester (Consent only)
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Part I Focus group GBM informal caregivers (ICs):

  • English-speaking as English proficiency screener and in the best judgment of the consenting professional. This is due to the focus groups being managed in English and the use of certain validated questionnaires only being available in English.
  • Age > 18
  • IC to an MSKCC patient with GBM who died a year or more ago

Part II Randomized Intervention of GBM ICs:

  • English-speaking as per English proficiency screener and in the best judgment of the consenting professional
  • Current ICs to a patient with GBM
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Score of > 4 on the Distress Thermometer (DT) and indication that this distress is related in some way to the caregiving role per self-report

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In the judgment of the consenting professional, clinician or PI and/or as per medical record, severe psychopathology or cognitive impairment likely to interfere with the participation or completion of the protocol or ability to provide meaningful information
  • Another family member of caregiver to the same patients is currently enrolled in the study
  • Ultimately, if interested, all caregivers who decline participation or are ineligible for the study for any reason, including because another caregiver of the patient is currently enrolled in the study, will be offered referrals to the MSKCC Counseling Center and to local mental health providers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Part I
Focus group (Part 1) of four to ten GBM ICs bereaved at least one year to help determine our recruitment strategy. Participants will be asked to reflect on their caregiving experience and specifically, when the receipt of a supportive intervention that addresses existential distress would have been most appropriate and well received. Should consensus among participants be reached (e.g., if the majority report that being approached at time of their loved one's cancer recurrence would have been the optimal time for enrollment), we will target our enrollment timeline to this point (and this timeline will be reflected in amended inclusion criteria). If no consensus is reached, the study staff will enroll ICs at all points in the caregiving trajectory and revisit the appropriateness of various points of contact during the Part 2 individual interviews.
Participants will be asked to reflect on their caregiving experience and specifically, when the receipt of a supportive intervention that addresses existential distress would have been most appropriate and well received.
Experimental: Part II
In Part 2, we will recruit 60 ICs of patients with GBM who will be randomized to receive either MCP-C or EUC. MCP-C will be delivered individually over 7 1-hour-long sessions within 7 - 14 weeks.
MCP-C is structured as a 7-session (1-hour weekly or biweekly sessions) individual intervention that utilizes a mixture of didactics, discussion and experiential exercises that focus around particular themes related to meaning and cancer caregiving
The "enhancement" to usual care in this study involves the inclusion of screening and targeted referral components as suggested by Reynolds et al. [79]. Research study assistants conducting the screening and providing feedback and referrals will be trained in the NCCN guidelines for distress management and will discuss the screening results and associated recommendations with the study PI (NCCN) [63]. As of November, 2017, ICs of patients seen in the Neurology Service at MSKCC are not consistently screened for distress and offered targeted referrals. Participants randomized to EUC will receive feedback about their level of distress (based on the Distress Thermometer administered at screening) after randomization. Within a week of randomization, and post-baseline, the study RSA will send EUC participants appropriate targeted referrals based on levels of distress and problem areas endorsed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers (MCP-C) delivered to caregivers of participants with GBM
Time Frame: 1 year
Feasibility will be measured by our ability to recruit our target sample of 60 ICs within the 1-year enrollment period. Our feasibility target for completion of follow-up assessments if 80% at T2 and 60% at T3, based on typical assessment completion rates in other psychosocial intervention studies conducted at our institution.
1 year
Acceptability of Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers (MCP-C) delivered to caregivers of participants with GBM
Time Frame: 1 year
Acceptability will be informed by the MCP-C completion rate and Phase 2 semi-structured interviews (deemed acceptable if at least 40% complete all psychotherapy sessions).
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Allison Applebaum, PhD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioblastoma

Clinical Trials on Focus Group

3
Subscribe