VR Usage in Non-Invasive Surgical Sub-Specialty Procedures

September 25, 2023 updated by: Samuel Rodriguez, Stanford University

Virtual Reality Usage in Non-Invasive Surgical Sub-Specialty Procedures

Preprocedural, preoperative, and prevascular access anxiety in pediatric patients has been previously shown to increase the likelihood of family stressors, agitation, sleep disturbances, and negative behavioral changes. The purpose of this study is to determine if a non-invasive distracting device (Virtual Reality (VR) headset, Augmented Reality (AR) headset, or bed mounted Video Projection unit (i.e. BERT, Bedside EnterRtainment Theater)) is more effective than the standard of care (i.e., no technology based distraction) for preventing anxiety before non-invasive surgical sub-specialty procedures among children during out-patient clinic visits. Examples of the most common procedures include, but are not limited to gastrostomy tube exchanges, suture removals, dressing changes, foley insertions, EEG set up, chest tube removals, cast removals, pin removals and other similar procedures. (The investigators refer to these procedures under an umbrella term of non-invasive surgical subspecialty procedures). The anticipated primary outcome will be reduction of child's anxiety during and after procedures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anxiety among children undergoing non-invasive surgical subspecialty procedures is common. Not only is high anxiety traumatic, but research in a surgical setting indicates that high anxiety in children before surgery leads to adverse outcomes such as increased pain and analgesics requirements, delayed hospital discharge and maladaptive behavioral changes. Treating anxiety may decrease any of these undesirable behaviors that may arise when experiencing a non-invasive surgical subspecialty procedure in a clinical setting.

In this study, investigators hope to determine if technology based distractions (VR headsets with headphones, AR headset, or BERT projector) are more effective than standard care for preventing high anxiety before non-invasive surgical subspecialty procedures. As a secondary objective of the study, the investigators seek to determine if the use of technology based distraction will result in higher parent and patient satisfaction as well as evaluate which techniques are most effective. As a tertiary aim, the investigators seek to understand if passive or active interventions are more effective in decreasing anxiety.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

291

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Be between ages of 2-18 years of age
  2. Have comprehension of instructions in the English language
  3. Have parental consent
  4. Pediatric patients must be undergoing non-invasive surgical subspecialty procedures at an Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (LPCH) out-patient clinic
  5. Children who are normally healthy (ASA I) or have a mild systemic disease (ASA II,III)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant cognitive impairment/developmental delays per parental report or H&P.
  2. Children with ASA IV (severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life) or ASA V (unstable patients not expected to survive >24 hours or without the operation)
  3. Children currently taking psychotropic mediations will be excluded from this study due to the affect emotion modulation
  4. Strong parental or patient preference for pharmacological anxiolytic
  5. Strong parental or patient preference for specific anxiety-reducing technique

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
The control group will be provided standard of care, which is no use of technologies.
Experimental: Intervention Group with Passive Content
Interventional arm will use technology based distractions (VR headsets, AR headset, tablets, or BERT projector) to prevent high anxiety before non-invasive surgical subspecialty procedures.
Technology based distractions (VR headsets, AR headset, tablets, or BERT projector)
Experimental: Intervention Group with Active Content
Interventional arm will use technology based distractions (VR headsets, AR headset, tablets, or BERT projector) to prevent high anxiety before non-invasive surgical subspecialty procedures.
Technology based distractions (VR headsets, AR headset, tablets, or BERT projector)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Score
Time Frame: Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure Minus Baseline
Peak Pain Score minus Baseline Pain Score. Pain scores range from 0 to 10. 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain possible. Change in pain score ranges from +10 to -10. Higher positive values represent a worse outcome, and higher negative values represent a better outcome.
Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure Minus Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety Score
Time Frame: Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure Minus Baseline
Fear Faces. Images of faces depicting increasing levels of fear measure the degree of fear the patient is experiencing. Faces correlate to a score ranging from 0 to 4. 0 represents the least scared and 4 represents the most scared. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure Minus Baseline
Anxiety Meter
Time Frame: Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure Minus Baseline
Childhood Anxiety Meter
Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure Minus Baseline
Family Satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
Family Satisfaction Survey
Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
Patient Satisfaction Survey
Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
Patient Cooperation
Time Frame: At the time of Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
Brief Behavioral Distress Scale (BBDS). Measures patient cooperation. Behavior cooperation choices exist on a scale consisting of non-interfering behaviors, potentially-interfering behaviors and interfering behaviors. Non-Interfering Behaviors = minor, verbal/vocal distress, moan, comfort seeking, etc. Potentially Interfering Behaviors = intense verbal/vocal distress, scream, shout, tensing of muscles, clench, flinch, gritting of teeth, etc.Interfering Behaviors = escape, disrupt, avoid, aggress, etc. Interfering behaviors represent a worse outcome.
At the time of Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
Patient Compliance
Time Frame: At the time of Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
Modified Induction Compliance Checklist
At the time of Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
Parent Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-P)
Time Frame: Baseline and Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure
PCS-P. Measures the extent of thought concerning pain Scale ranges from 1 to 5. 1 represents not thinking at all about pain and 5 represents thinking very much about pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline and Immediately Post Non-Invasive Surgical Subspecialty Procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samuel Rodriguez, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 42351

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Behavioral Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Technology Based Distractions

Subscribe