Esophageal Cooling in Radiofrequency Cardiac Ablation

February 27, 2024 updated by: Brad Suprenant, Riverside Medical Center

Esophageal Cooling in Radiofrequency Cardiac Ablation: Pilot Study

This pilot study evaluates the addition of the EnsoETM esophageal cooling device to the radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedure in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in adults. Half of participants will receive the EnsoETM in addition to RF ablation, while the other half will receive luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during RF ablation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study Specific Procedures:

  • Study specific imaging will include endoscopic evaluation of the esophagus one day before surgery at the time of the pre-op Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) and again 1-day post-op. This will include endoscopic esophageal intubation with visual assessment of the entire esophagus and grading of lesions. Coupled with this procedure will include endoscopic ultrasound assessment of the esophagus at the level of the left atrium with specific attention to the sub-mucosal layer that separates esophagus from the cardiac tissue. The patient will undergo moderate sedation during this procedure, which will accompany the TEE.
  • The Esophageal Cooling Device (ECD) will be placed by trained study staff following endotracheal intubation. Proper positioning will be verified. A temperature probe will be placed to verify the patients core temperature. The target temperature will be set to the core temperature at the beginning of the procedure. Two minutes prior to ablation on the posterior wall the target temperature will be changed to the minimum temperature setting which will allow for maximal cooling. Cooling will take place throughout the duration of posterior wall ablation. After ablation in this territory is complete the target temperature will return to the patients core temperature. The device will be removed at the completion of the procedure by anesthesiology when there is no further need for an orogastric tube.
  • LET monitoring will not be performed in the patients of the intervention group as the ECD is prohibitive. Therefore, ice lavage of the esophagus, as detailed below, will not be performed in this group.

Standard Care Procedures:

  • Medical History will be obtained by interview and will involve identification of contraindications to the use of the ECD. This includes a history of esophageal perforation or varices. An allergy to silicone will be assessed.
  • The patient's active medication list will be reviewed as is standard protocol for atrial fibrillation ablation, but this is not specific to the study as there are no medications that would impact the use of the ECD.
  • All subjects will be on Protonix (40mg; twice daily) immediately following surgery for 30 days and anticoagulation for 3 months following surgery.
  • The physical exam will be performed. Study specific exam is included as part of the airway assessment which is performed on a regular basis by anesthesiology. The oropharynx will be assessed prior to placement of the ECD.
  • Radiofrequency ablation involving the posterior aspect of the left atrium will be performed with standard LET monitoring which may include intermittent boluses of iced lavaged saline through the nasogastric tube when the temperature rises above 1 degree centigrade. Termination of atrial fibrillation with provocation testing will be completed and further atrial tachyarrhythmia ablation will be carried out as indicated.
  • The patient will follow-up in the office based on standard procedure with 10 day and 3 month follow-up to be scheduled.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Kankakee, Illinois, United States, 60901
        • Riverside Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has an atrial arrhythmia requiring radiofrequency ablation on the posterior aspect of the heart.
  • Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent.
  • Subject is capable of adhering to the expectations of the study protocol (e.g., attending follow-up visit).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has known esophageal deformity, or evidence of esophageal trauma.
  • Subject has prior radiation therapy involving the esophagus.
  • Subject has a history of esophageal disease (e.g., esophageal varices, cirrhosis, history of esophagectomy, previous swallowing disorders, or achalasia).
  • Subject has ingested acidic or caustic poisons.
  • Subject is incarcerated.
  • Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant.
  • Subject has a silicone allergy.
  • Subject has esophageal bleeding prior to surgical procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Esophageal thermal regulation device
Use of esophageal thermal regulation device during radiofrequency ablation.
Active Comparator: LET monitoring
Use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring during radiofrequency ablation procedure.
Other Names:
  • LET monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Esophageal Mucosal Damage
Time Frame: The post-intervention outcome measure was performed within 1 day after Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Esophageal mucosal damage as assessed by endoscopic evaluation using Zagar's Modified Endoscopic Classification Scheme. Higher scores on this scale indicate a worse outcome. The grading system is as follows: Grade 0: Normal Examination; Grade 1: Edema and Hypermia of the Mucosa; Grade 2a: Superficial ulceration, erosions, friability, blisters, exudates, hemorrhages, whitish membranes; Grade 2b: Grade 2a pluse deep discrete or circumferential ulcerations; Grade 3a: Small scattered areas of multiple ulceration and areas of necrosis with brown-black or greyish discoloration; Grade 3b: Extensive necrosis. For this grading scale we used the following scoring:

0=0 1=1 2a=2 2b=3 3a=4 3b=5

The post-intervention outcome measure was performed within 1 day after Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Adverse Events]
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Presence of Esophageal Submucosal Damage, Indicated by Number of Ulcers as Assessed by Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)
Time Frame: 1 day
Altered submucosal tissue architecture as assessed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on EnsoETM

Subscribe