Interactions Between Striatum and Cerebellum in ADCY5 and PRRT2 Dystonias (AMEDYST)

The investigators will study the relationship between the basal ganglia and the cerebellum in dystonia by associating cerebellar stimulations with functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Although dysfunctions in both basal ganglia and cerebellum in dystonia are well documented, the functional relationships between these two important motor control networks remains unclear in the context of dystonia. Here the investigators propose to tackle this issue by associating cerebellar stimulations with functional analysis using fMRI in dystonic patients.

The working hypothesis is that the primary torsion dystonia (PTD) pathophysiology involves dysfunction of striatum that is amplified by dysregulation of the cerebello-thalamo-striatal pathway.

The project is to study dystonia forms resulting primarily from dysfunctions of the striatum (patients with mutation of the ADCY5 gene) and compare them with patients with putative dysfunction of the cerebellum (patients with mutation of the PRRT2 gene) and healthy controls. In these patients, the investigators will look for (1) how cerebello-thalamo striatal pathway can be influenced by striatal dysfunctions and (2) whether cerebellar stimulation may prevent (or worsen?) the disrupted activity in the basal ganglia and (3) whether striatum-related dystonia share the same abnormal network with another form of dystonia resulting from another dysfunction (patients with PRRT2 mutation).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France
        • Département de Neurologie, Fédération des Maladies du Système Nerveux, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47 Bd de l'Hôpital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical diagnosis of Dystonia
  • characterized ADCY5 or PRRT2 mutation
  • must have a European Social Security card or a parent having an European Social Security card
  • must be older than > 15 years 3 months
  • must be able to give informed consent or, for minor patients, parents must be able to give informed consent
  • must be able to comply with all study procedures, based on the judgment by the investigator(s).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major depression or any major mental disorders (axis I disorders)
  • neurologic disorder other than dystonia
  • presence of pacemaker, intracardiac lines, implanted pumps or stimulators, or metal objects inside the eye or skull, cochlear implant
  • Permanent makeup of lips or eyelids
  • Black large tattoo close to the head
  • Severe claustrophobia
  • Current pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Copper intrauterine device Subjects with one of the following exclusion criteria will not receive cerebellar stimulation
  • Open scalp wounds or scalp infection,
  • epilepsy or seizures
  • Taking at the time of the study: ketamine, antidepressants, ganciclovir, ritonavir, amphetamines, antiemetic.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham cerebellar stimulation
Participants will receive a Sham stimulation (inefficient probe) applied over the cerebellum.
The intervention will consist in a continuous theta burst stimulation of the cerebellum under neuronavigation.
Active Comparator: Real cerebellar stimulation
Participants will receive a real continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) applied over the cerebellum.
The intervention will consist in a continuous theta burst stimulation of the cerebellum under neuronavigation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting state functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the striatum
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Synchrony between the cerebellum and the striatum, calculated from resting state fMRI done at visit2 will be compared between the 3 groups (healthy controls, ADCY5 patients, PRTT2 patients)
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation (ALFF) of blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the cerebellum
Time Frame: 6 weeks
ALFF of Blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the cerebellum will be compared between the 3 groups (healthy controls, ADCY5 patients, PRTT2 patients
6 weeks
Fractional anisotropy (FA) of the cerebello-striatal tract
Time Frame: 1 day
FA of the disynaptic tract between the cerebellum and the striatum will be compared between the 3 groups.
1 day
Creatine concentration in the striatum measured with diffusion weighted spectroscopy.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Creatine concentration in the striatum measured from the spectroscopy, will be compared between the 3 groups
6 weeks
Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation (ALFF) of blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the striatum
Time Frame: 6 weeks
ALFF of Blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the striatum will be compared between the 3 groups (healthy controls, ADCY5 patients, PRTT2 patients
6 weeks
Resting state functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the thalamus
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Synchrony between the cerebellum and the thalamus, calculated from resting state fMRI done at visit2 will be compared between the 3 groups (healthy controls, ADCY5 patients, PRTT2 patients)
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emmanuel Flamand-Roze, MD, PhD, Pitie-Salpetriere

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe