- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03483714
Muscle Activation Characteristics During Spinal Manipulation in Healthy and Low Back Pain Participants
March 28, 2018 updated by: Stuart Currie, University of Denver
To characterize muscle activity through electromyography (EMG) of the lumbar spine during high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation according to parameters of practitioner contact (location, applied force) in healthy participants and two categories of low back pain participants.
Study Overview
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80208
- University of Denver
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
community sample
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- male and female participants ages 18 to 55 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
Active Worker's Compensation claim related to low back pain episode Active personal injury case related to low back pain episode Currently taking muscle relaxers, steroids, or narcotics
- Body mass index > 30 kg/m2
- Active cancer process
- Active infection
- Pregnancy
- High risk of osteoporosis assessed using the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (included in submission)
- Osteogenic conditions (see screening questionnaire)
- Premature menopause
- Latex Allergies
- Lumbar spine or pelvic surgery
- Past spinal trauma producing spinal fracture
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Healthy Participants
Spinal manipulation
|
HVLA (High Velocity Low Amplitude) spinal manipulation directed at the lumbar spine and sacroiliac (SI) joints
|
|
Acute Low back pain participants
Spinal Manipulation
|
HVLA (High Velocity Low Amplitude) spinal manipulation directed at the lumbar spine and sacroiliac (SI) joints
|
|
Chronic low back pain participants
Spinal Manipulation
|
HVLA (High Velocity Low Amplitude) spinal manipulation directed at the lumbar spine and sacroiliac (SI) joints
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Muscle Response
Time Frame: During spinal manipulation at the time of testing
|
Muscle activity of the lumbar spinal musculature as measured by both surface and indwelling electromyography.
Total response expressed as a percentage of muscles "on".
|
During spinal manipulation at the time of testing
|
|
Muscle Activity Onset Delay
Time Frame: During spinal manipulation at the time of testing
|
Muscle activity of the lumbar spinal musculature as measured by both surface and indwelling electromyography.
Time delay between the manipulation force and the muscle activity
|
During spinal manipulation at the time of testing
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bradley S Davidson, PhD, University of Denver
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Currie SJ, Myers CA, Krishnamurthy A, Enebo BA, Davidson BS. Methods of Muscle Activation Onset Timing Recorded During Spinal Manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 May;39(4):279-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
- Currie SJ, Myers CA, Durso C, Enebo BA, Davidson BS. The Neuromuscular Response to Spinal Manipulation in the Presence of Pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 May;39(4):288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
- Myers CA, Enebo BA, Davidson BS. Optimized prediction of contact force application during side-lying lumbar manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(9):669-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.10.010.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
November 5, 2015
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
November 5, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 28, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
March 30, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
March 30, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 28, 2018
Last Verified
March 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- LSM
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.