- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07436975
Thoracic Spinal Manipulation in Stroke
May 23, 2026 updated by: Omer Dursun, Bitlis Eren University
Effects of Thoracic Spinal Manipulation on Balance, Fall Risk, and Thoracic Mobility in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Crossover Trial
The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of thoracic spinal manipulation on balance, fall risk, and thoracic mobility of the patients with chronic stroke.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study, utilizing a randomized crossover design, is planned to be conducted on a minimum of 26 patients with stroke who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Patients included in the study will be randomly assigned to receive both placebo thoracic spinal manipulation and thoracic spinal manipulation interventions.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Merkez
-
Bolu, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye), 14280
- Bolu İzzet Baysal Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having chronic stroke,
- A Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 or higher,
- Ability to stand independently for 20 seconds or more,
- Ability to walk independently for 10 meters, using assistive devices or orthoses if necessary,
- Being between 40 and 75 years of age,
- Having a Brunnstrom stage of 4 or above
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of whiplash injury,
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia,
- History of spinal manipulation treatment within the previous 2 months,
- History of cervical or thoracic fracture or dislocation,
- History of cervical or thoracic spine surgery,
- Diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy,
- Presence of serious spinal pathology,
- Presence of any orthopedic or neurological disorder other than stroke, or an unstable cardiac condition,
- Presence of a vestibular disorder,
- The presence of lower extremity ulceration or amputation,
- Alcohol consumption in the last 24 hours,
- Posterior circulation stroke involving the basilar artery or cerebellum,
- Having experienced an acute lower extremity injury in the last six weeks,
- History of lower extremity surgery
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: PlaceboThoracic Spinal Manipulation Group
Participants will receive placebo thoracic manipulation in the first session and thoracic spinal manipulation after a one-week washout period.
|
This technique is based on the application of a high-velocity, low-amplitude force to the thoracic spine with the aim of increasing thoracic mobility.
This intervention is a classic method used to evaluate the effect of thoracic spinal manipulation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Thoracic Spinal Manipulation Group
Participants will receive thoracic spinal manipulation in the first session and placebo thoracic manipulation after a one-week washout period.
|
This technique is based on the application of a high-velocity, low-amplitude force to the thoracic spine with the aim of increasing thoracic mobility.
This intervention is a classic method used to evaluate the effect of thoracic spinal manipulation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Postural Stability Index Measurement
Time Frame: Change from baseline overall postural stability index immediately after the intervention
|
This index will be assessed by measuring deviations of the center of gravity in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.
Lower scores indicate smaller deviations and better postural stability.
The test will be performed on a stable platform with two trials of 30 seconds each.
The average of the three trials will be automatically calculated by the TechnoBody balance system.
|
Change from baseline overall postural stability index immediately after the intervention
|
|
Fall Risk Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline overall postural stability index immediately after the intervention
|
Fall risk will be assessed by measuring the patient's ability to maintain balance on an unstable platform.
Based on their ability to maintain balance, a fall risk score will be generated, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of falling.
The test will be performed with two 30-second trials.
The average of the three trials will be calculated automatically by the TechnoBody balance system.
|
Change from baseline overall postural stability index immediately after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anteroposterior Stability Index Measurement
Time Frame: Change from baseline overall postural stability index immediately after the intervention
|
The anteroposterior stability index will be assessed by measuring deviations of the center of gravity in the anteroposterior direction.
Lower scores indicate smaller deviations and better anteroposterior postural stability.
The test will be performed on a stable platform with two trials of 30 seconds each.
The average of the three trials will be automatically calculated by the TechnoBody balance system.
|
Change from baseline overall postural stability index immediately after the intervention
|
|
Mediolateral Stability Index Measurement
Time Frame: Change from baseline mediolateral stability index immediately after the intervention
|
The mediolateral stability index will be assessed by measuring deviations of the center of gravity in the mediolateral direction.
Lower scores indicate smaller deviations and better mediolateral postural stability.
The test will be performed on a stable platform with two trials of 30 seconds each.
The average of the three trials will be automatically calculated by the TechnoBody balance system.
|
Change from baseline mediolateral stability index immediately after the intervention
|
|
Thoracic Mobility
Time Frame: Change from baseline mediolateral stability index immediately after the intervention
|
Thoracic mobility will be assessed by measuring trunk rotation and lateral flexion using a smartphone inclinometer positioned at the level of T2.
|
Change from baseline mediolateral stability index immediately after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Burak Mavuş, M.Sc., Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Merve Tunçdemir, Asst. Prof., Bitlis Eren University
- Principal Investigator: Ömer Dursun, Assoc. Prof., Bitlis Eren University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
- Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Aug;8(8):741-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
- Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):531-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
- Karthikbabu S, Chakrapani M, Ganeshan S, Rakshith KC, Nafeez S, Prem V. A review on assessment and treatment of the trunk in stroke: A need or luxury. Neural Regen Res. 2012 Sep 5;7(25):1974-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.25.008.
- Cleland JA, Childs JD, McRae M, Palmer JA, Stowell T. Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Man Ther. 2005 May;10(2):127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.08.005.
- Gross AR, Kay T, Hondras M, Goldsmith C, Haines T, Peloso P, Kennedy C, Hoving J. Manual therapy for mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2002 Aug;7(3):131-49. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0465.
- Arifin N, Abu Osman NA, Wan Abas WA. Intrarater test-retest reliability of static and dynamic stability indexes measurement using the Biodex Stability System during unilateral stance. J Appl Biomech. 2014 Apr;30(2):300-4. doi: 10.1123/jab.2013-0130. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
- Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, Feys H, Schuback B, Baert I, Jenni W, Schupp W, Thijs V, De Weerdt W. Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;78(7):694-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.101642. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
- Ryerson S, Byl NN, Brown DA, Wong RA, Hidler JM. Altered trunk position sense and its relation to balance functions in people post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;32(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181660f0c.
- Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, Hewer RL. Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;52(11):1267-72. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.11.1267.
- Shin DC, Lee YW. The immediate effects of spinal thoracic manipulation on respiratory functions. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Sep;28(9):2547-2549. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.2547. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
- Good DC, Bettermann K, Reichwein RK. Stroke rehabilitation. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2011 Jun;17(3 Neurorehabilitation):545-67. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000399072.61943.38.
- Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, de Groot IJ, van Limbeek J, Vermeulen M, de Haan RJ. Prognostic factors for ambulation and activities of daily living in the subacute phase after stroke. A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2003 Mar;17(2):119-29. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr585oa.
- Duarte E, Marco E, Muniesa JM, Belmonte R, Diaz P, Tejero M, Escalada F. Trunk control test as a functional predictor in stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2002 Nov;34(6):267-72. doi: 10.1080/165019702760390356.
- Hsieh CL, Sheu CF, Hsueh IP, Wang CH. Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients. Stroke. 2002 Nov;33(11):2626-30. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000033930.05931.93.
- Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Feys H, Thijs V, Vaes K, De Weerdt W. Discriminant ability of the Trunk Impairment Scale: A comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Sep 2;27(17):1023-8. doi: 10.1080/09638280500052872.
- Jeong YJ, Kim GS, Jeong YG, Moon HI. Can Pulmonary Function Testing Predict the Functional Outcomes of Poststroke Patients?: An Observational Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Dec;99(12):1145-1149. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001507.
- Joo S, Lee Y, Song CH. Immediate Effects of Thoracic Spinal Manipulation on Pulmonary Function in Stroke Patients: A Preliminary Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Sep;41(7):602-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.12.005. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
- Paris SV. Spinal manipulative therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Oct;(179):55-61.
- Lee M, Latimer J, Maher C. Manipulation: investigation of a proposed mechanism. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1993 Nov;8(6):302-6. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(93)90004-2.
- Sohn MK, Jee SJ, Hwang P, Jeon Y, Lee H. The Effects of Shoulder Slings on Balance in Patients With Hemiplegic Stroke. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;39(6):986-94. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.986. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
- Learman KE, Myers JB, Lephart SM, Sell TC, Kerns GJ, Cook CE. Effects of spinal manipulation on trunk proprioception in subjects with chronic low back pain during symptom remission. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.12.004.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 16, 2026
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 22, 2026
Study Completion (Actual)
May 22, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 22, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
February 27, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 28, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 23, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BEUFTR-11
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
Clinical Trials on Thoracic Spinal Manipulation
-
Université du Québec à Trois-RivièresCompleted
-
University of New EnglandSaco Bay Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy; Physical Therapy and Sports...Completed
-
University of MichiganRocky Mountain University of Health ProfessionsCompleted
-
University of FloridaCompleted
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterNational Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Company FoundationCompleted
-
Université du Québec à Trois-RivièresFoundation for Chiropractic Education and Research (FCER)Completed
-
University of Western StatesNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Completed
-
A.T. Still University of Health SciencesCompleted
-
Chatham UniversityMegan J. Olson HuntCompleted
-
Ignacio Alejandro Astudillo GanoraCompletedBack Pain | Lumbar Pain Syndrome | Back Pain, LowSpain