- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03552198
Improving the Behavioural Impact of Air Quality Alerts
Improving the Behavioural Impact of Air Quality Alerts in London
The evidence shows that adherence to air quality advice to adopt protective behaviours during pollution episodes is suboptimal, and that the traditional strategy of simply informing people about high pollution episodes is not effective. The aim of the present study was to investigate how to improve the behavioural impact of existing air quality alert messages through a systematic manipulation of key communication variables, including perceived susceptibility, self-efficacy, response efficacy, planning, message specificity, etc. Users of an existing air quality alert smartphone application in London, who agreed to take part in the study, were randomly allocated to a control group (i.e. receiving usual health advice associated with the official UK Air Quality Index) or an intervention group receiving health advice associated with air quality alerts in an alternative format (i.e. targeting key variables). Both intended and actual adherence behaviours were investigated. Qualitative data were also collected to understand the reasons for not adopting protective behaviours in response to receiving a real air pollution alert.
Implications of this study include the potential to increase protective behaviours in the general population during air pollution episodes through the development of more effective communication strategies provided via existent air quality alert systems.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
According to data released in 2014, in 2012 around 3.7 million people died prematurely in the world as a result of exposure to ambient air pollution ((WHO), 2014). Evidence has shown the negative short- and long-term effects of air pollution on both premature mortality and morbidity from cardiopulmonary disease (for an overview, see (Kelly & Fussell, 2015)). This is particularly a problem in London (Samoli et al., 2016), where levels of air pollution are quite worrying. In the UK monitoring networks measure the levels of different air pollutants, and these measurements are provided by the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) in the form of daily air quality indices (AQIs), together with separate health advice for at-risk groups and the general population. A recently published systematic review (D'Antoni, Smith, Auyeung, & Weinman, 2017) has found suboptimal adherence levels to health advice associated with air quality alerts, and identified several facilitators and barriers of adherence. Some of the facilitators included beliefs that air pollution can have negative health effects (i.e. perceived severity), outcome expectancies (e.g., beliefs that something can be done to reduce smog), beliefs about the health benefits of AQI adoption (i.e. response efficacy), and receiving advice from health care professionals. Barriers to adherence included: lack of understanding of the indices, being exposed to health messages that reduced both concern about air pollution and perceived susceptibility, as well as perceived lack of self-efficacy/locus of control, reliance on sensory cues and lack of time to make behavioural changes. The findings of this systematic review have informed the current research study, which aimed to improve the behavioural impact of existing air quality alerts. In particular, alternative health messages were developed based on the psychosocial factors identified in the systematic review. The purpose of the study was to test whether these theory and evidence-based alternative communication formats, compared to the official messages sent in association with the UK AQIs, maximise the behavioural impact of existing alert systems.
Methods
Design:
This was a randomised control trail using a 2-way factorial design, with target population (2 levels: general population vs. individuals with a pre-existing health condition) and message format (2 levels: usual message format vs. alternative format) as between-factors. Qualitative data were also collected to understand the reasons for actual adherence and non-adherence.
- Theoretical framework and targeted psychosocial predictors:
The COM-B model (Michie, van Stralen, & West, 2011) was used as a theoretical framework to guide in the understanding of the facilitators and barriers to behaviour change in response to air quality alerts. The control groups received usual air quality alerts and health advice based on the UK AQI messages, and the intervention groups received alternative health messages targeting knowledge about the health impact of exposure to air pollution, perceived severity of air pollution, perceived susceptibility, perceived efficacy of protective behaviours, self-efficacy, perceived negative consequences associated with protective behaviours, reliance on sensory cue, and action planning. In addition, study participants who reported having a pre-existent respiratory condition and who were randomly allocated in the intervention group, also received specific additional messages targeting beliefs about efficacy and side effects of inhalers, and medication self-efficacy.
- Targeting message specificity:
Specificity refers to the extent to which a message provides a detailed description of the recommended behaviour. A meta-analysis of 18 studies (O'Keefe, 1997) found that messages providing health recommendations with a more specific description seem to be significantly more persuasive than generic recommendations (r=.10, k=18, N=11,105). Participants in the control group received the usual UK AQI message format containing less specific recommendations (e.g. advice for at risk individuals in case of high air pollution: 'Adults and children with lung problems, and adults with heart problems, should reduce strenuous physical exertion, particularly outdoors'). On the other hand, the intervention group received more specific recommendations ('Adults and children with lung problems, adults with heart problems, and older people, should reduce levels and length of physical activity outdoors. Where possible, change: travel route or exercise location (e.g. use our app to find less polluted roads or parks) or time (e.g. mornings or less polluted times)').
Control and intervention groups were compared in intended and actual behaviour change outcome measures. We predicted that the alternative format would be associated with higher behaviour change, compared to the usual format.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, SE1 9NH
- King' College London
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- To be eligible to participate, participants had to be members of the general public in the adult age range (>18 years), be fluent in English, working or living in Greater London, and being new or old users of a specific air quality alert smartphone application.
Exclusion Criteria:
- younger than 18 years
- not working or living in Greater London
- no longer users of the air quality alert smartphone application.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
NO_INTERVENTION: General public/usual health advice
Healthy participants with a self-reported existing health condition were randomised to receive the usual UK Air Quality Indices health advice.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: General public/alternative health advice
Generally healthy participants were randomised to receive targeted health advice about the adoption of protective behaviours in an alternative format.
|
These messages targeted specific beliefs about air pollution and protective actions aimed at reducing exposure to air pollution.
In addition, message specificity was targeted, which means that compared to the usual messages, the alternative messages reported more detailed health recommendations.
|
NO_INTERVENTION: At risk group/usual health advice
Participants with a self-reported pre-existing health condition were randomised to receive the usual UK Air Quality Indices health advice.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: At risk group/alternative health advice
Participants with a self-reported existing health conditions were randomised to receive targeted health advice (based on their health condition) about the adoption of protective behaviours in an alternative format.
|
These messages targeted specific beliefs about air pollution and protective actions aimed at reducing exposure to air pollution.
In addition, message specificity was targeted, which means that compared to the usual messages, the alternative messages reported more detailed health recommendations.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Adoption of Protective Behaviour at 4 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks
|
Differences between conditions in actual adoption of protective behaviours at 4 weeks.
Outcome measures were collected via self-reports: The question was: 'In the past 4 weeks, how often have you taken action to reduce exposure to air pollution, in response to hearing or reading an air quality forecast?' Measures: from 1 'Not at all' to 9 'all of the time' (answers 'N/A, I am not aware of any forecast' were excluded from analyses).
|
Baseline and at 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Considered Making Permanent Changes
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
|
Differences between conditions in planning the adoption of protective behaviours at 4 weeks.
Outcome measures were collected via self-reports: The question was: 'In the past 4 weeks, have you considered making permanent changes to daily travel route or exercise location/time?' possible answers were 'yes' or 'no'.
'unsure' answers were treated as system missing.
|
at 4 weeks
|
Actual Behaviour Change in Response to a Real Air Quality Alert
Time Frame: At 3 weeks
|
Differences between conditions in self-reported actual behaviour change in response to receiving a real air quality alert.
Behavioural outcomes were collected via a questionnaire asking participants to respond 'yes/no' to whether they had changed a series of behaviours in response to receiving the alert.
In this case it was a 'moderate' alert
|
At 3 weeks
|
Intentions to Adhere to Health Advice Associated With a Hypothetical High Air Pollution Scenario
Time Frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks
|
Differences between conditions in intentions to adhere to the health advice received in association with a hypothetical high air pollution alert scenario.
Intentions were measured by a self-report item: participants were asked to agree with a statement about their adherence intentions on 9-point scale, where 1=strongly disagree to 9=strongly agree.
|
Baseline and at 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- (WHO), W. H. O. (2014). Burden of disease from air pollution. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/FINAL_HAP_AAP_BoD_24March2014.pdf?ua=1.
- D'Antoni D, Smith L, Auyeung V, Weinman J. Psychosocial and demographic predictors of adherence and non-adherence to health advice accompanying air quality warning systems: a systematic review. Environ Health. 2017 Sep 22;16(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0307-4.
- Kelly FJ, Fussell JC. Air pollution and public health: emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk. Environ Geochem Health. 2015 Aug;37(4):631-49. doi: 10.1007/s10653-015-9720-1. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
- Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
- Daniel J. O'Keefe (1997) Standpoint Explicitness and Persuasive Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Varying Conclusion Articulation in Persuasive Messages, Argumentation and Advocacy, 34:1, 1-12, DOI: 10.1080/00028533.1997.11978023
- Samoli E, Atkinson RW, Analitis A, Fuller GW, Green DC, Mudway I, Anderson HR, Kelly FJ. Associations of short-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution with cardiovascular and respiratory hospital admissions in London, UK. Occup Environ Med. 2016 May;73(5):300-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103136. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- LRS-16/17-4286
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Health Behavior
-
Holbaek SygehusRecruitingHealth Behavior | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related Behavior | Health LiteracyDenmark
-
Finnish Institute for Health and WelfareCompletedHealth Behavior | Health Care Utilization | Health Care Seeking BehaviorFinland
-
Basque Health ServiceUnknownHealth Promotion | Health Behavior | Health Education | Patient Education | Counseling | Behavior TherapySpain
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandSolidarMed LesothoRecruitingRecruitment | Health Behavior | Motivation | Social Behavior | Health Care Utilization | Consumer Behavior | Health Care Seeking Behavior | Researcher-Subject RelationsLesotho
-
Imperial College LondonRecruitingHealth Attitude | Disease | Cancer | Health Behavior | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related BehaviorUnited Kingdom
-
Research on Healthcare Performance Lab U1290RecruitingStress | Health Behavior | Health-Related BehaviorFrance
-
Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-BraUniversity of Turin, Italy; University of Eastern Piedmont; Eclectica Sas di...CompletedEffectiveness of the Updated Version of the School-based Program Diario Della Salute (DDS-2) (DDS-2)Mental Health Wellness 1 | Health Behavior | Adolescent BehaviorItaly
-
Research on Healthcare Performance Lab U1290RecruitingSedentary Behavior | Sedentary Time | Health Behavior | Health-Related Behavior | Physical InactivityFrance
-
World Health OrganizationLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; University of Ghana; Biomedical... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHealth-Related Behavior | Adolescent Behavior | Adolescent Development | Health Care Seeking BehaviorGhana, Tanzania, Zimbabwe
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth Attitude | Health Behavior | Health KnowledgeTurkey
Clinical Trials on Alternative health advice
-
Basque Health ServiceUnknownObesity | OverweightSpain
-
University of LiverpoolCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityAllegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network... and other collaboratorsRecruitingDepression | Sleep | Anxiety | Chronic Disease | Mental Health Wellness 1 | Risk Reduction | Physical InactivityUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongHong Kong Council on Smoking and HealthActive, not recruiting
-
Karolinska InstitutetUniversity Hospital, Toulouse; University of Eastern Finland; Universität des...CompletedAlzheimer Disease; ProdromalSweden
-
Basque Health ServiceCompleted
-
TNOVitas; SwissAnalysisCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Netherlands
-
University of Missouri, Kansas CityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedSmoking | Tobacco Use | Nicotine DependenceUnited States
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedAlcohol DrinkingUnited States