- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03553576
Drug Concentration and Volume on Adequate Labor Analgesia With PIEB (CADD2)
The Relationship Between Local Anesthetic Concentration and Volume on Adequate Labor Analgesia With Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus
Neuraxial labor analgesia is performed by the administration of a local anesthetic/opioid mixture in the epidural space. The delivery method is a combination of continuous infusion, provider-administered boluses and patient-administered boluses (patient controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA]) via epidural catheter. The anesthetic solution administered through the lumbar epidural catheter must spread cephalad in the epidural space to reach the T10 nerve roots and spinal cord, and must spread caudad to reach the caudal nerve roots in the epidural space.
Epidural infusion pumps capable of delivering PIEB of local anesthetic with PCEA have become commercially available and many studies have attempted to assess the optimal parameter settings (including volume of programmed bolus, bolus interval, rate of bolus administration) to provide superior labor analgesia.
Traditionally higher concentration local anesthetic solutions have been associated with increased motor blockade leading to a higher incidence of instrumental vaginal delivery. Several local anesthetic solutions with varying drug concentrations are available for labor analgesia and are used clinically in the United States. We plan to perform a randomized, controlled, double-blind study to test the hypothesis that patients whose labor analgesia is maintained using PIEB with low-volume bolus (6.25 mL) of a higher local anesthetic concentration solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) will require less supplemental analgesia (manual provider re-doses) than patients whose PIEB is delivered with a high-volume bolus (10 mL) of lower density local anesthetic solution (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between bolus volume and concentration of local anesthetic during maintenance of labor analgesia with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) analgesia.
The hypothesis of this study is: patients whose labor analgesia is maintained using PIEB with low-volume bolus (6.25 mL) of higher local anesthetic concentration solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) will have a longer duration of adequate analgesia (time to first manual re-dose request) than patients whose PIEB is delivered with a high-volume bolus (10 mL) of lower concentration local anesthetic solution (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Prentice Women's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years and above
- Nulliparous parturients
- Present to the labor and delivery unit for an induction of labor or who are in spontaneous labor
- Request neuraxial labor analgesia at ≤5 cm cervical dilation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are not eligible to receive a combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique with 25 mcg of intrathecal fentanyl
- Non-English speaking
- Failed initiation of CSE analgesia (VAS pain score >10 15 minutes after intrathecal dose)
- Need to have the epidural catheter replaced during labor
- Who deliver within 90 minutes of initiation of labor analgesia
- Require re-dose within 90 minutes of initiation of labor analgesia.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low volume bolus
6.25 mL administration at 250 ml per hour of a greater density solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL)
|
Administration of a low-volume bolus (6.25 mL) of greater density solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) at 250 mL per hour given by CADD pump.
|
|
Experimental: High volume bolus
10 mL administration of a lower density local anesthetic (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL).
|
Administration of a high-volume bolus (10 mL) of lower density local anesthetic (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) at 250 mL per hour given by CADD pump.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anesthesia Provider Administered Bolus
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Anesthesia provider (MD) administered boluses of additional anesthetic administered prior to the delivery of the baby.
|
72 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
VAS at 10 Centimeters Dilation of Cervix
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
VAS (visual analogue scale) at 10 centimeters dilation of cervix on a scale of 0 (no pain,good) to 100 (worst pain imaginable,bad)
|
24 hours
|
|
VAS Score After Delivery
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale) on a score of 0 (no pain,good) to 100 (worst pain imaginable,bad) immediately after delivery of baby
|
24 hours
|
|
Intrascapular Pain
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Number of participants who experienced intrascapular pain (pain in your shoulder blade) during the study period.
|
72 hours
|
|
Provider Administered Bolus
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Number of participants requiring anesthesia provider administration of additional bolus doses of pain medication.
|
72 hours
|
|
Number of Participants Who Required Additional Provider Redoses
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Additional number of participants who required additional anesthesia care provider redoses of pain medication.
|
72 hours
|
|
Time to First Anesthesiology Provider Bolus
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Time elapsed in minutes from epidural set up to time to request supplemental analgesia provided by the anesthesiology care provider.
|
72 hours
|
|
VAS Score Prior to First Provider Bolus Dose
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Patient reported visual analogue scale score (0 no pain,good-100 worst pain imaginable, bad) prior to the first anesthesiology care provider bolus dose of anesthetic (pain medication).
|
72 hours
|
|
VAS Score 30 Minutes After Anesthetic Care Provider Dose
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Patient reported visual analogue scale score (0 no pain, good -100 worst pain imaginable, bad) 30 minutes after the first anesthesiology care provider bolus dose of anesthetic was administered to the participant for pain relief.
|
72 hours
|
|
Bupivacaine Consumption Per Hour
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Average consumption of bupivacaine in milligrams per hour.
|
72 hours
|
|
Maximum Oxytocin Dose
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Maximum oxytocin dose administered intravenously in international units.
|
72 hours
|
|
Time of Intrathecal Administration to Delivery
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Elapsed time in minutes from the intrathecal administration of anesthetic by anesthesiology provider to time of delivery of baby.
|
72 hours
|
|
Number of Participants Categorized by Mode of Delivery
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Mode of delivery identified as: normal vaginal delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery or emergency cesarean delivery
|
72 hours
|
|
PCA Boluses
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Number of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) boluses of pain medication requested and number of PCEA medication boluses administered.
|
72 hours
|
|
PCA Boluses Ratio
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
The ratio of the number of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) pain medication boluses requested and number of PCEA pain medication boluses administered by the PCEA pump.
|
72 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Feyce Peralta, MD, Northwestern University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):904-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a.
- Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Oct;14(4):305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.004.
- Chua SM, Sia AT. Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Jun-Jul;51(6):581-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03018402.
- Kaynar AM, Shankar KB. Epidural infusion: continuous or bolus? Anesth Analg. 1999 Aug;89(2):534. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00063. No abstract available.
- Hogan Q. Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):150-6. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.29748.
- Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001 Jul 7;358(9275):19-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05251-X.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00206113
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
Clinical Trials on Low volume bolus
-
University College, LondonUniversity of Portsmouth; University of WollongongUnknownDehydration HypertonicUnited Kingdom
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityCompletedKnee ArthropathyThailand
-
Federal University of Rio Grande do SulPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica; Faculdade de MedicinaCompletedMechanically Ventilated Patients | Normal LungsBrazil
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc; Leiden University Medical Center; Gelre Hospitals; Tergooi Hospital and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Inje UniversityCompletedColonoscopy | Bowel PreparationKorea, Republic of
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS); TIRR Memorial... and other collaboratorsCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreZoll Medical CorporationNot yet recruiting
-
Peking University Third HospitalRecruiting
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUnknownPulmonary Ventilation; Newborn, AbnormalGermany
-
Universidade Norte do ParanáEnrolling by invitation