Low vs Standard Local Anesthetics Boluses for Continuous Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty

August 8, 2024 updated by: Wirinaree Kampitak, MD, Chulalongkorn University

Low Versus Standard Concentrations and Volumes Local Anesthetics Boluses for Continuous Adductor Canal Block Under Ultrasound-guidance in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To investigate the efficacy of two different regimens of local anesthetic boluses for continuous adductor canal block under ultrasound-guidance in total knee arthroplasty at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for patients with severe knee osteoarthritis. However, one of the challenges associated with TKA is the significant postoperative pain experienced by patients, which can delay early mobilization and physical therapy. Uncontrolled pain worsens patient outcomes and healthcare costs as it can increase the risk of complications after surgery. Therefore, effective pain management is important for optimizing patient outcomes and promoting a smooth recovery process.Despite the absence of a standardized recommendation for the volume and concentration of bolus administration in continuous adductor canal block (CACB), many previous studies, have demonstrated the efficacy of a high-dose bolus followed by a low-concentration local anesthetic infusion for CACB. However, these trials exhibited differences in the doses and volumes of bolus injection. Therefore, the necessity of high concentration and volume bolus CACB in combination with comprehensive multimodal analgesia and LIA for postoperative pain management in TKA remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of two different regimens of local anesthetic used in boluses for continuous adductor canal block under ultrasound-guidance in total knee arthroplasty at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10310
        • Chulalongkorn University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing TKA aged more than 18 years
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1-3
  • Patients with body weight index (BMI) 18-40 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal to participate
  • Patients with known allergic to medications used in the research protocol
  • Patients with contraindications to neuraxial or regional anesthesia, including existing neuropathy or neurological deficits involving the lower extremities, coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis and local skin infections
  • Patients with contraindications to NSAIDs such as history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, congestive heart failure, stroke, gastrointestinal bleedings or ulceration, asthma, hepatic and renal disease, abnormal coagulation, or pregnancy
  • Patients with chronic opioid use (opioids have been used daily or almost daily for more than three months or sixty milligrams or more of morphine has been used daily for more than one month) or diagnosed with neuropathic pain
  • Patients that are unable to perform preoperative Quantitative sensory testing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Low Concentration and Volume
0.15% bupivacaine 10 ml boluses for continuous adductor canal block
Compare Low and Standard concentrations and volumes of bupivacaine boluses for continuous adductor block
Other Names:
  • Low concentration and volume of bupivacaine bolus
Placebo Comparator: Standard Concentration and Volume
0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml boluses for continuous adductor canal block
Compare Low and Standard concentrations and volumes of bupivacaine boluses for continuous adductor block
Other Names:
  • Low concentration and volume of bupivacaine bolus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average knee pain score assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
Average postoperative pain score assessed by NRS from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable)
6 hours after surgery
Average knee pain score assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
Average postoperative pain score assessed by NRS from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable)
12 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quadriceps strength assessed by maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in Newton
Time Frame: preoperative - postoperative day 2
Quadriceps strength assessed by MVIC in Newton at 90 degrees at preoperative and postoperative day 0,1,2
preoperative - postoperative day 2
The degree of active range of motion (ROM) of knee joint
Time Frame: preoperative - postoperative day 2
Evaluate patient's functional outcomes by the degree of knee active ROM (measured by a goniometer) at preoperative and postoperative day 0,1,2
preoperative - postoperative day 2
Functional outcomes assessed by Five Times Sit to Stand Test (5XSST)
Time Frame: preoperative - postoperative day 2
Evaluate patient's functional outcomes by 5XSST at preoperative and postoperative day 0,1,2
preoperative - postoperative day 2
Functional outcomes assessed by Time Up and Go (TUG) test
Time Frame: preoperative - postoperative day 2
Evaluate patient's functional outcomes by TUG tests at preoperative and postoperative day 0,1,2
preoperative - postoperative day 2
Postoperative pain score assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: preoperative to day 7 after hospital discharge
Postoperative pain score at rest and on movement assessed by NRS from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable)
preoperative to day 7 after hospital discharge
morphine consumption in milligrams
Time Frame: post0perative day 0-2
Patient's morphine consumption at postoperative day 0,1,2
post0perative day 0-2
postoperative complications assessed by Likert scale
Time Frame: postoperative day 0-2
postoperative complications such as nausea/vomitting, sleep disturbance and fall assessed by Likert scale from 1-7 (1 = strongly disagree/ extremely unlikely, 2 = disagree/ unlikely, 3 = slightly disagree/ slightly unlikely, 4 = either, 5 = slightly agree/ slightly likely, 6 = agree/ likely, 7 = strongly agree/ extremely likely)
postoperative day 0-2
The time to first rescue analgesia
Time Frame: postoperative day 0-2
the period from the CACB administration to the first IV morphine administration
postoperative day 0-2

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay assessed by hours
Time Frame: postoperative day 2
Evaluate length of hospital stay (from admission to hospital discharge) by hours
postoperative day 2
patient satisfaction assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery and 7 days after hospital discharge
Evaluate patient satisfaction by NRS from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable)
48 hours after surgery and 7 days after hospital discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Arthropathy

Clinical Trials on Low bolus concentration and volume

Subscribe