- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06179628
Low vs Standard Local Anesthetics Boluses for Continuous Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
August 8, 2024 updated by: Wirinaree Kampitak, MD, Chulalongkorn University
Low Versus Standard Concentrations and Volumes Local Anesthetics Boluses for Continuous Adductor Canal Block Under Ultrasound-guidance in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
To investigate the efficacy of two different regimens of local anesthetic boluses for continuous adductor canal block under ultrasound-guidance in total knee arthroplasty at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for patients with severe knee osteoarthritis.
However, one of the challenges associated with TKA is the significant postoperative pain experienced by patients, which can delay early mobilization and physical therapy.
Uncontrolled pain worsens patient outcomes and healthcare costs as it can increase the risk of complications after surgery.
Therefore, effective pain management is important for optimizing patient outcomes and promoting a smooth recovery process.Despite the absence of a standardized recommendation for the volume and concentration of bolus administration in continuous adductor canal block (CACB), many previous studies, have demonstrated the efficacy of a high-dose bolus followed by a low-concentration local anesthetic infusion for CACB.
However, these trials exhibited differences in the doses and volumes of bolus injection.
Therefore, the necessity of high concentration and volume bolus CACB in combination with comprehensive multimodal analgesia and LIA for postoperative pain management in TKA remains uncertain.
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of two different regimens of local anesthetic used in boluses for continuous adductor canal block under ultrasound-guidance in total knee arthroplasty at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
140
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bangkok, Thailand, 10310
- Chulalongkorn University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing TKA aged more than 18 years
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1-3
- Patients with body weight index (BMI) 18-40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
- Patient refusal to participate
- Patients with known allergic to medications used in the research protocol
- Patients with contraindications to neuraxial or regional anesthesia, including existing neuropathy or neurological deficits involving the lower extremities, coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis and local skin infections
- Patients with contraindications to NSAIDs such as history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, congestive heart failure, stroke, gastrointestinal bleedings or ulceration, asthma, hepatic and renal disease, abnormal coagulation, or pregnancy
- Patients with chronic opioid use (opioids have been used daily or almost daily for more than three months or sixty milligrams or more of morphine has been used daily for more than one month) or diagnosed with neuropathic pain
- Patients that are unable to perform preoperative Quantitative sensory testing.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Low Concentration and Volume
0.15% bupivacaine 10 ml boluses for continuous adductor canal block
|
Compare Low and Standard concentrations and volumes of bupivacaine boluses for continuous adductor block
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Standard Concentration and Volume
0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml boluses for continuous adductor canal block
|
Compare Low and Standard concentrations and volumes of bupivacaine boluses for continuous adductor block
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average knee pain score assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
|
Average postoperative pain score assessed by NRS from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable)
|
6 hours after surgery
|
|
Average knee pain score assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
|
Average postoperative pain score assessed by NRS from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable)
|
12 hours after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quadriceps strength assessed by maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in Newton
Time Frame: preoperative - postoperative day 2
|
Quadriceps strength assessed by MVIC in Newton at 90 degrees at preoperative and postoperative day 0,1,2
|
preoperative - postoperative day 2
|
|
The degree of active range of motion (ROM) of knee joint
Time Frame: preoperative - postoperative day 2
|
Evaluate patient's functional outcomes by the degree of knee active ROM (measured by a goniometer) at preoperative and postoperative day 0,1,2
|
preoperative - postoperative day 2
|
|
Functional outcomes assessed by Five Times Sit to Stand Test (5XSST)
Time Frame: preoperative - postoperative day 2
|
Evaluate patient's functional outcomes by 5XSST at preoperative and postoperative day 0,1,2
|
preoperative - postoperative day 2
|
|
Functional outcomes assessed by Time Up and Go (TUG) test
Time Frame: preoperative - postoperative day 2
|
Evaluate patient's functional outcomes by TUG tests at preoperative and postoperative day 0,1,2
|
preoperative - postoperative day 2
|
|
Postoperative pain score assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: preoperative to day 7 after hospital discharge
|
Postoperative pain score at rest and on movement assessed by NRS from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable)
|
preoperative to day 7 after hospital discharge
|
|
morphine consumption in milligrams
Time Frame: post0perative day 0-2
|
Patient's morphine consumption at postoperative day 0,1,2
|
post0perative day 0-2
|
|
postoperative complications assessed by Likert scale
Time Frame: postoperative day 0-2
|
postoperative complications such as nausea/vomitting, sleep disturbance and fall assessed by Likert scale from 1-7 (1 = strongly disagree/ extremely unlikely, 2 = disagree/ unlikely, 3 = slightly disagree/ slightly unlikely, 4 = either, 5 = slightly agree/ slightly likely, 6 = agree/ likely, 7 = strongly agree/ extremely likely)
|
postoperative day 0-2
|
|
The time to first rescue analgesia
Time Frame: postoperative day 0-2
|
the period from the CACB administration to the first IV morphine administration
|
postoperative day 0-2
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of hospital stay assessed by hours
Time Frame: postoperative day 2
|
Evaluate length of hospital stay (from admission to hospital discharge) by hours
|
postoperative day 2
|
|
patient satisfaction assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery and 7 days after hospital discharge
|
Evaluate patient satisfaction by NRS from 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable)
|
48 hours after surgery and 7 days after hospital discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Tao Y, Zheng SQ, Xu T, Wang G, Wang Y, Wu AS, Yue Y. Median effective volume of ropivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided adductor canal block. J Int Med Res. 2018 Oct;46(10):4207-4213. doi: 10.1177/0300060518791685. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
- Chadha M, Si S, Bhatt D, Krishnan S, Kumar R, Bansal A, Sharma AK. The Comparison of Two Different Volumes of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Onset and Duration of Analgesia for Upper Limb Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):87-91. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_4_20. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
- Jaeger P, Jenstrup MT, Lund J, Siersma V, Brondum V, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Optimal volume of local anaesthetic for adductor canal block: using the continual reassessment method to estimate ED95. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):920-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev362.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 9, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 17, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
July 24, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 11, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
December 22, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 12, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 8, 2024
Last Verified
August 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0675/66
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Arthropathy
-
Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityActive, not recruitingKnee Arthropathy | Hip Arthropathy | Ankle Arthropathy | Elbow Arthropathy | Shoulder ArthropathyChina
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyNot yet recruitingKnee Arthritis | Knee ArthropathyChina
-
The Taylor CollaborationWilma Chan Highland Hospital CampusNot yet recruitingKnee Arthritis | Knee Arthropathy
-
University of California, San DiegoGate ScienceWithdrawnKnee ArthropathyUnited States
-
IRCCS San Raffaele RomaCompletedTotal Knee Replacement | Knee ArthropathyItaly
-
The Catholic University of KoreaUnknownKnee Arthropathy | Anatomically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
Stryker OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingKnee Arthritis | Arthropathy of Knee | ReplacementUnited States
-
Universidad de ZaragozaCompletedArthropathy of Knee | Arthropathy of HipSpain
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la RéunionCompletedArthropathy of Knee | Arthropathy of HipRéunion
-
Total Sports Medicine & OrthopedicsIncrediwear Holdings IncNot yet recruitingKnee Arthroscopy | Knee Arthropathy Associated With Other Conditions
Clinical Trials on Low bolus concentration and volume
-
Medical University of South CarolinaGeneral ElectricCompletedAortic Valve StenosisUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityTerminatedPain | Labor Pain | AnesthesiaUnited States
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedSeasonal Allergic Rhinitis
-
University College, LondonUniversity of Portsmouth; University of WollongongUnknownDehydration HypertonicUnited Kingdom
-
Cairo UniversityNorhan Abdelaleem Ali; Ahmed Shaker Ragab; Yasmina sayed Abdrabo IsmaelCompletedComparing of 2 Different Volumes in ESPB in Patients Undergoing MRMEgypt
-
Shanxi Provincial Maternity and Children's HospitalUnknown
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSmoking | Tobacco UseUnited States
-
Federal University of Rio Grande do SulPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica; Faculdade de MedicinaCompletedMechanically Ventilated Patients | Normal LungsBrazil
-
Tan, LijieUnknown
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc; Leiden University Medical Center; Gelre Hospitals; Tergooi Hospital and other collaboratorsCompleted