- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03600571
Injection Site Diversity Influences HA Distribution and Clinical Results in CP and KOA
July 16, 2018 updated by: Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Injection Site Diversity Influences Sodium Hyaluronate Distribution and Its Clinical Results in Management of Chondromalacia Patellae and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Preliminary, Multi-central, Randomize-controlled Serial Trial
In order to investigate the difference of intra-articular hyaluronate's distribution and compare the clinical outcomes of viscosupplementation for mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (mKOA) between the anteromedial (AM) and medial midpatellar (MMP) approach groups.
This study included two parts, cadaver study (n=64) and random controlled trial (n=100).
Hyaluronic acid (HA) traced by methylene blue was injected into the knee, and the intra-articular distribution of HA was assessed using a five-point scale in the cadaver study.
The clinical outcomes of 5-weekly injections of HA were evaluated by WOMAC and Lequesne index and the follow-up times were at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 24 after the injections in the random controlled trial.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
164
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
- Nanfang Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic unilateral mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (mKOA) that were defined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria
- Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3
- Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index (Likert version 3.1) pain subscale reached 10 or greater
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy, acute fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, gouty arthritis, traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthritis
- Oral Celebrex within 2 weeks, HA and lidocaine allergy, intra-articular injection of HA or corticosteroid to the target knee within the past 6 months
- Surgery in the target knee within the past 6 months, OA of the target knee with K-L grade 4
- Active liver and renal disease, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: AM groups in cadavers study
32 osteoarthritic knees of cadavers were randomly assigned to the AM group (injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion).
Hyaluronic acid (HA) traced by methylene blue was injected into the knee, and the intra-articular distribution of HA was assessed using a five-point scale.
|
injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion
|
|
Experimental: MMP groups in cadavers study
32 osteoarthritic knees of cadavers were randomly assigned to the MMP group (injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension).
Hyaluronic acid (HA) traced by methylene blue was injected into the knee, and the intra-articular distribution of HA was assessed using a five-point scale.
|
injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension
|
|
Experimental: AM groups in random controlled trial
50 patients with unilateral mKOA were enrolled and randomly into the AM group (injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion).The clinical outcomes of 5-weekly injections of HA were evaluated by WOMAC and Lequesne index.
The follow-up times were at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 24 after the injections.
|
injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion
|
|
Experimental: MMP groups in random controlled trial
50 patients with unilateral mKOA were enrolled and randomly into the MMP group (injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension).The clinical outcomes of 5-weekly injections of HA were evaluated by WOMAC and Lequesne index.
The follow-up times were at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 24 after the injections.
|
injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: baseline before the first injection
|
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme).
Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68.
The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
|
baseline before the first injection
|
|
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 1 week after the first injection
|
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme).
Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68.
The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
|
1 week after the first injection
|
|
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the first injection
|
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme).
Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68.
The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
|
2 weeks after the first injection
|
|
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the first injection
|
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme).
Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68.
The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
|
3 weeks after the first injection
|
|
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the first injection
|
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme).
Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68.
The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
|
4 weeks after the first injection
|
|
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 5 weeks after the first injection
|
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme).
Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68.
The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
|
5 weeks after the first injection
|
|
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 14 weeks after the first injection
|
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme).
Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68.
The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
|
14 weeks after the first injection
|
|
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 24 weeks after the first injection
|
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme).
Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68.
The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
|
24 weeks after the first injection
|
|
Lequesne index
Time Frame: baseline before the first injection
|
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function.
The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
|
baseline before the first injection
|
|
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 1 week after the first injection
|
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function.
The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
|
1 week after the first injection
|
|
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the first injection
|
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function.
The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
|
2 weeks after the first injection
|
|
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the first injection
|
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function.
The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
|
3 weeks after the first injection
|
|
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the first injection
|
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function.
The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
|
4 weeks after the first injection
|
|
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 5 weeks after the first injection
|
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function.
The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
|
5 weeks after the first injection
|
|
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 14 weeks after the first injection
|
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function.
The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
|
14 weeks after the first injection
|
|
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 24 weeks after the first injection
|
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function.
The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
|
24 weeks after the first injection
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 30, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 16, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
July 26, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 26, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 16, 2018
Last Verified
May 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NFEC-2014-074
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Edin MešanovićCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis of the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis of the Knees | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis Knee | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee JointBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Golden Jubilee National HospitalJohnson & Johnson; DePuy OrthopaedicsNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (OA) | Osteo Arthritis | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis (Knee) | Osteo Arthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom
-
Dr. David WassersteinSunnybrook Research InstituteRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)Canada
-
LifeBridge HealthMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.; Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain Chronic | Arthropathy of Knee Joint | Knee Disease | Osteoarthritis Knees Both | Osteoarthritis Knee Left | Osteoarthritis Knee RightUnited States
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
Emory UniversityVertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee ArthritisUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)United States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on anteromedial (AM) portal
-
National Police HospitalCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureKorea, Republic of
-
Universidade Federal do CearaCompletedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeBrazil
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Not yet recruitingSleep Quality | Mother-Infant Interaction | AttachmentTurkey
-
Artromedical Konrad Malinowski ClinicRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Collateral Ligament, Knee; Sprain (Strain), MedialPoland
-
University of Muhammadiyah AcehNot yet recruitingCognitive Change | Blood Pressure | Nutrition, Healthy | Eating, Time Restricted
-
C5 BiomedicalSerenaGroup, Inc.RecruitingPathologic Processes | Cardiovascular Diseases | Vascular Diseases | Glucose Metabolism Disorders | Metabolic Diseases | Skin Diseases | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus | Diabetic Foot | Foot Ulcer | Ulcer | Diabetic Angiopathies | Leg Ulcer | Skin Ulcer | Diabetes Complications | Diabetic Neuropathies | Foot... and other conditionsUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Active, not recruitingHealthy | Overweight and ObesityUnited States
-
AllerganCompletedBlue Light DamageUnited States
-
Jiani WuRecruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)China
-
Auris Medical AGCompleted