Injection Site Diversity Influences HA Distribution and Clinical Results in CP and KOA

Injection Site Diversity Influences Sodium Hyaluronate Distribution and Its Clinical Results in Management of Chondromalacia Patellae and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Preliminary, Multi-central, Randomize-controlled Serial Trial

In order to investigate the difference of intra-articular hyaluronate's distribution and compare the clinical outcomes of viscosupplementation for mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (mKOA) between the anteromedial (AM) and medial midpatellar (MMP) approach groups. This study included two parts, cadaver study (n=64) and random controlled trial (n=100). Hyaluronic acid (HA) traced by methylene blue was injected into the knee, and the intra-articular distribution of HA was assessed using a five-point scale in the cadaver study. The clinical outcomes of 5-weekly injections of HA were evaluated by WOMAC and Lequesne index and the follow-up times were at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 24 after the injections in the random controlled trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

164

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Nanfang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic unilateral mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (mKOA) that were defined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria
  • Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3
  • Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index (Likert version 3.1) pain subscale reached 10 or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, acute fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, gouty arthritis, traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthritis
  • Oral Celebrex within 2 weeks, HA and lidocaine allergy, intra-articular injection of HA or corticosteroid to the target knee within the past 6 months
  • Surgery in the target knee within the past 6 months, OA of the target knee with K-L grade 4
  • Active liver and renal disease, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AM groups in cadavers study
32 osteoarthritic knees of cadavers were randomly assigned to the AM group (injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion). Hyaluronic acid (HA) traced by methylene blue was injected into the knee, and the intra-articular distribution of HA was assessed using a five-point scale.
injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion
Experimental: MMP groups in cadavers study
32 osteoarthritic knees of cadavers were randomly assigned to the MMP group (injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension). Hyaluronic acid (HA) traced by methylene blue was injected into the knee, and the intra-articular distribution of HA was assessed using a five-point scale.
injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension
Experimental: AM groups in random controlled trial
50 patients with unilateral mKOA were enrolled and randomly into the AM group (injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion).The clinical outcomes of 5-weekly injections of HA were evaluated by WOMAC and Lequesne index. The follow-up times were at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 24 after the injections.
injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion
Experimental: MMP groups in random controlled trial
50 patients with unilateral mKOA were enrolled and randomly into the MMP group (injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension).The clinical outcomes of 5-weekly injections of HA were evaluated by WOMAC and Lequesne index. The follow-up times were at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 24 after the injections.
injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: baseline before the first injection
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
baseline before the first injection
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 1 week after the first injection
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
1 week after the first injection
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
2 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
3 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
4 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 5 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
5 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 14 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
14 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)
Time Frame: 24 weeks after the first injection
WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.
24 weeks after the first injection
Lequesne index
Time Frame: baseline before the first injection
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
baseline before the first injection
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 1 week after the first injection
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
1 week after the first injection
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the first injection
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
2 weeks after the first injection
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the first injection
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
3 weeks after the first injection
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the first injection
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
4 weeks after the first injection
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 5 weeks after the first injection
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
5 weeks after the first injection
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 14 weeks after the first injection
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
14 weeks after the first injection
Lequesne index
Time Frame: 24 weeks after the first injection
The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.
24 weeks after the first injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on anteromedial (AM) portal

Subscribe