Technology Development for Physical Rehabilitation of Patients With Upper Extremity Motor Deficits (RePlay) (RePlay)

February 2, 2023 updated by: Robert Rennaker, The University of Texas at Dallas

Technology Development for Physical Rehabilitation of Patients With Upper Extremity Motor Deficits

Injuries and disease processes that produce upper extremity deficits are devastating to patients and their families. One potential avenue to treat these neurological disorders is through the enhancement of neural plasticity, which is the ability of the brain to reorganize and recover following insult. After a minor injury, the brain undergoes beneficial neural plasticity, compensating for altered neural activity to restore normal function. However, in the cases of moderate to severe injury and disease, e.g. spinal cord injury (SCI), insufficient or improper plasticity limits recovery, leaving patients with long-term disability. Therefore, methods that can drive robust and specific plasticity have great potential to treat neurological injuries and disease.

The Texas Biomedical Device Center (TXBDC) at UT Dallas has developed a groundbreaking therapy, called Targeted Plasticity Therapy (TPT), which pairs traditional motor, sensory, and cognitive rehabilitation with precise stimulation of the vagus nerve, to guide such robust and specific plasticity to treat a wide range of neurological deficits.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The groundbreaking therapy developed at Texas Biomedical Device Center (TXBDC) , called Targeted Plasticity Therapy (TPT) pairs traditional motor, sensory, and cognitive rehabilitation with precise stimulation of the vagus nerve, to guide such robust and specific plasticity to treat a wide range of neurological deficits. The success of this concomitant therapy will be furthered, in part, through the development and use of mechanical devices aimed at measuring the effects of rehabilitation in patients with an upper extremity neurological deficit, e.g. from SCI. These devices are small hand controllers used to play simple video games that can also measure force and movement. Additionally, this study will be used to inform the future development of the rehabilitation game software as well as an optional game chair (in patients that use wheelchairs, the games can also be played from the patient's own chair).

To optimize the evaluation of these RePlay devices and software, and to decrease the time requirement for patients, research will be divided into two phases. Patients can participate in either one or both phases. Participation in phase II is not contingent on participation in phase I.

Phase I will involve 80 participants using the RePlay devices and games on a single visit. These 80 participants will be a collection of participants with no neurological disorders, participants recovering from stroke, those with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease and Spinal Cord Injuries. This will allow us to determine the ability of these patient populations to enjoyably use these devices and games compared with their degree of impairment. Participants' degree of impairment will be quantified by standard rehabilitation measurements for each disease process, including the ASIA Spinal Cord Impairment Scale, GRASSP, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function, dynomometry strength readings

In Phase II, 20 participants will be randomized equally to one of two groups. Each group will receive the same amount of therapy, only in a different sequence.

Group 1 will receive:

  1. two weeks of RePlay device therapy twice per week at REACT (weeks 1-2), followed by re-assessment,
  2. then will rest for 2 weeks (weeks 3-4),
  3. then will take the RePlay devices and tablets home for two weeks (weeks 5-6) for daily RePlay device therapy, followed by re-assessment.

Group 2 will receive:

  1. two weeks of RePlay device therapy daily at home (they will take the devices and tablets home) (weeks 1-2), followed by re-assessment,
  2. then will rest for 2 weeks (weeks 3-4),
  3. then will receive two weeks of RePlay device therapy twice per week at REACT (weeks 5-6), and then will undergo re-assessment.

This will allow investigators to test the Replay rehabilitation software and hardware over 2 two week periods in order to evaluate the pattern of game play improvement in this population over time in different settings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Addison, Texas, United States, 75001
        • REACT
      • Richardson, Texas, United States, 75080
        • UT Dallas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Partial upper limb impairment in one or both arms as a result of a neurological injury or disease
  • Age 18-65

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emotional disability that would interfere with participation as determined by Dr.

Wigginton

  • Inability to understand instructions in English
  • No upper limb movement
  • Incarcerated individuals
  • For Phase II, anticipated inability to complete study visits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 1

Group 1 will receive:

  1. Medical History and Brief Physical Exam
  2. Diagnostic Assessments
  3. Patient Instruction and use of RePlay Device
  4. two weeks of RePlay device therapy twice per week at REACT (weeks 1-2), followed by re-assessment,
  5. then will rest for 2 weeks (weeks 3-4),
  6. then will take the RePlay devices and tablets home for two weeks (weeks 5-6) for daily RePlay device therapy, followed by re-assessment.
This will be completed by a medical doctor on the research team
One assessment in Phase I, and three assessments in Phase II (baseline, and following each 2 week active study period)
  1. providing measurable upper extremity movement, control, and coordination feedback for patients, therapists, and physicians
  2. improving assessment and evaluation of patients involved in future interventional studies,
  3. producing a dynamic, responsive, inexpensive physical therapy system that can be used in the comfort of the participants' own home.
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 2

Group 2 will receive:

  1. Medical History and Brief Physical Exam
  2. Diagnostic Assessments
  3. Patient Instruction and use of RePlay Device
  4. two weeks of RePlay device therapy daily at home (they will take the RePlay devices and tablets home) (weeks 1-2), followed by re-assessment,
  5. then will rest for 2 weeks (weeks 3-4),
  6. then will receive two weeks of RePlay device therapy twice per week at REACT (weeks 5-6), and then will undergo re-assessment.
This will be completed by a medical doctor on the research team
One assessment in Phase I, and three assessments in Phase II (baseline, and following each 2 week active study period)
  1. providing measurable upper extremity movement, control, and coordination feedback for patients, therapists, and physicians
  2. improving assessment and evaluation of patients involved in future interventional studies,
  3. producing a dynamic, responsive, inexpensive physical therapy system that can be used in the comfort of the participants' own home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the rehabilitation device design as reported by subjects using a 10-point Likert scale
Time Frame: Through Study Completion, approximately 8-9 weeks
Assess feasibility, ease of use and enjoyment for device in injured population. This will be measured by subject report. Subjects will verbally provide feedback as they use the software and hardware. Feedback will be recorded and changes will be made based on feedback received from participants. Subjects self-report their experienced enjoyment of RePlay using a 10-point Likert scale (10 = extreme enjoyment, 1 = no enjoyment). Higher scores represent a greater degree of experienced enjoyment.
Through Study Completion, approximately 8-9 weeks
Evaluate the functionality of rehabilitation device as reported by subjects using a 10-point Likert scale
Time Frame: Through Study Completion approximately 8-9 weeks
Assess general fit, and functionality of these devices to further the device development. both in the home and in the rehabilitation setting. This will be measured by subject report. This will be measured by subject report. Subjects will verbally provide feedback as they use the software and hardware. Feedback will be recorded and changes will be made based on feedback received from participants. Subjects self-report their experienced fit and function of RePlay using a 10-point Likert scale (10 = extremely easy to fit, 1 = didn't fit at all). Higher scores represent a greater degree of experienced fit and function
Through Study Completion approximately 8-9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 10, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Physical exam and medical history

3
Subscribe