Technology-Based Distractions During Minor Procedures

September 25, 2023 updated by: Samuel Rodriguez, Stanford University

Evaluation of Technology-Based Distractions In Pediatric Patients During Minor Procedures

The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive distracting devices (Virtual Reality headset, Augmented Reality Headset) are more effective than the standard of care (i.e., no technology-based distraction) for decreasing anxiety and pain scores in pediatric patients undergoing various minor procedures (i.e lumbar punctures and cardiac catheterization). The anticipated primary outcome will be a reduction of overall cumulative medication and secondary outcomes include but are not limited to: physician satisfaction, discharge time, pain scores, anxiety scores, and procedure time.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 17 and under
  • Able to consent or have parental consent
  • Undergoing minor procedures (i.e lumbar punctures, cardiac catheterization) at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (LPCH) or Stanford Hospital facilities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People who do not consent
  • Significant Cognitive Impairment
  • History of Severe Motion Sickness
  • Current Nausea
  • Seizures
  • Visual Problems
  • Non-English Speaking
  • Patients who clinically unstable or requires urgent/emergent intervention
  • (ASA) Physical status classification class 4 or higher
  • Patient or parental preference for General Anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cardiac Cathertization Patients
Participants will use technology based distraction during procedure.
If parent and child consent to be in the study, the clinician will offer the use of one of the technologies: Virtual Reality (VR) headset or Augmented Reality (AR) headset. Active content includes video games, interactive avatars, and interactive experiences, while passive content includes video clips and movies. All patients will be offered the opportunity to use these technologies during their minor procedures if they meet eligibility criteria. Those who decline or who are switched over to the standard of care due to patient preference, health providers monitoring and assessment during the procedure will be noted in the database.
Experimental: Allergy Patients
Participants will use technology based distraction during procedure
If parent and child consent to be in the study, the clinician will offer the use of one of the technologies: Virtual Reality (VR) headset or Augmented Reality (AR) headset. Active content includes video games, interactive avatars, and interactive experiences, while passive content includes video clips and movies. All patients will be offered the opportunity to use these technologies during their minor procedures if they meet eligibility criteria. Those who decline or who are switched over to the standard of care due to patient preference, health providers monitoring and assessment during the procedure will be noted in the database.
No Intervention: Procedure-Only Patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure anxiety score
Time Frame: Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Numerical anxiety scale (0-10), 0 being no anxiety and 10 being the worst imaginable anxiety
Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parent and Child Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Parent and child questionnaire with 5 questions asking the individual on a scale from 1-5 how much they agree with each statement (1=Not at all, 3=A little bit, 5=A lot). It has stamens such as "Having the technology made me feel more relaxed before my procedure" or "If I ever have procedure again, I would like to use this technology"
Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Virtual and Augmented Reality Feedback Survey
Time Frame: Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Measure satisfaction and feedback for Virtual Reality/ Augmented Reality in regards to software and hardware for future iterations.
Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Asses cumulative medication dosing and the duration of procedure
Time Frame: Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Measure dosing requirements for anxiolytic and/or analgesic medications for participants thought their procedure. We will then compare these doses to their own historical chart data, since many of these patents come in routinely, and use their own data for intra-reliability measures.
Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Evaluation of Passive vs Active Interventions
Time Frame: Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
There is variation in the immersive technology experiences (active vs passive content), as a part of the study the investigators also aim to evaluate the degree of cognitive load which is suitable for clinical applications during minor procedures. During the participants immersive experience in either AR or VR, there are embedded questions in the experience that can gage as to the patient's emotional status (happy, sad, mad) or VAS scales (0-10, 0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain) that can let the research personnel know if we need to increase the cognitive load. If patients are self-reporting higher VAS scores, or aversive emotional status (i.e mad) the cognitive load will be increased to enhance the distraction experience from the procedure.
Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fear assessment
Time Frame: Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Patient's fear will be assessed through the Children's Fear Scale (CFS). Patients will be shown faces showing different levels of anxiety on a scale from 0 to 4. The left-most face (minimum value of 0) shows no anxiety at all and the right-most face shows extreme anxiety (maximum value of 4). Patients look at these faces and choose the one that shows how much anxiety was felt during procedure. This will be done only for allergy patients.
Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Patient's pain will be assessed through the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale from 0 to 10. The left-most face has a value of 0 meaning no pain/doesn't hurt at all and the right-most face has a value of 10 being a lot of pain/hurts as much as you can imagine. Patients will be asked which face best describes their pain levels during the procedure. This will only be done for allergy patients.
Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Procedural Compliance
Time Frame: Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)
Procedural compliance is measured through modified Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC). All behaviors observed in checklist are marked. Total score is the number of categories checked, perfect score is 0. This will only be done for allergy patients.
Duration of procedure (usually no more than 2-4 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas J Caruso, MD, MEd, Stanford University
  • Principal Investigator: Samuel Rodriguez, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 46917

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Use of Virtual Technology

3
Subscribe