Shock Efficacy Study Comparing Fixed Tilt and Fixed Pulse Width in a General Implantable-Cardioverter Population (EFICAZ)

April 10, 2020 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

Shock Efficacy, a Randomized Study Comparing Fixed Tilt and Fixed Pulse Width in a General Implantable-Cardioverter Population

This is a prospective, 1:1 randomized, interventional, multicenter and international trial. Approximately 790 subjects are expected to be enrolled to 40 sites in the south of Europe and Middle East.

The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the first appropriate shock of an ICD in a ventricular tachyarrhythmia, when the waveform of the shock is programmed with the standard waveform, Fixed Tilt with a value of 65% (Control Group), versus the exclusive waveform programmable in SJM ICDs, Fixed Pulse Width (Study Group), in a standard population of subjects with ICD indication.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

790

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Puerta de Hierro
    • Andalucia
      • Malaga, Andalucia, Spain
        • Hospital Virgen de la Victoria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who meet the current ESC indications for ICD or CRT-D implant. This includes upgrades indications from pacemaker to ICD or to CRT-D or replacements of ICDs or CRT-Ds provided that there is no previous record of ineffective shocks

    • Subjects who are willing to be registered on the Merlin.net remote follow-up program
    • Subject ≥18 years
    • Subjects with life expectancy of at least 1 year
    • Subjects who agree to comply with the follow-up program included in this protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Subjects on the waiting list for a heart transplant or under consideration for a transplant over the next 12 months

    • Subjects with Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 40 days prior to enrollment
    • Subjects who have undergone a recent cardiac revascularization (PTCA, Stent or CABG) procedure in the 4 weeks prior to enrollment
    • Functional NYHA Class IV
    • Subjects who are participating in another ICD or CRT-D study
    • Subjects who are pregnant at the time of enrollment or women of childbearing potential that do not take contraceptives
    • Any disability or limitations to correctly understand or complete the study (physical, intellectual, logistical)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fixed Tilt (65%)
This is the control group, so device programming for shock energy is the default setting
This is the standard group, so device programming for shock energy is the default setting
Active Comparator: Fixed Pulse Width
This is the Study group.
The device has to be programmed with fixed pulse width for each phase of the biphasic waveform

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of the first appropriate shock to revert a tachyarrhythmia to sinus rhythm
Time Frame: 5 years
Rate of rhythm conversion from Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia to sinus rhythm by the first appropriate shock programmed to 25 Joules (or equivalent voltage) programming the shock waveform in Fixed Pulse Width (Study Group) versus the Fixed Tilt with value 65% (Control Group).
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ignacio Fernandez, MD
  • Principal Investigator: Javier Alzueta, MD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRD_914

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventricular Arrythmia

Clinical Trials on Fixed Tilt (65%)

3
Subscribe