The Clinical Significance of Portal Hypertension After Cardiac Surgery: a Multicenter Prospective Observational Study (TECHNO-MULTI)

February 23, 2021 updated by: Andre Denault, Montreal Heart Institute

The Clinical Significance of Portal Hypertension After Cardiac Surgery

Portal flow pulsatility detected by Doppler ultrasound is an echographic marker of cardiogenic portal hypertension from right ventricular failure and is associated with adverse outcomes based on previous studies performed at the Montreal Heart Institute. This multicenter prospective cohort study aims to determine if portal flow pulsatility after cardiopulmonary bypass separation is associated with a longer requirement of life support after cardiac surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis: Portal flow pulsatility detected by Doppler ultrasound during cardiac surgery is an echographic marker of cardiogenic portal hypertension from right ventricular failure and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Background: Peri-operative right ventricular failure is associated with a high mortality rate. In this context, organ perfusion is hampered by both the reduction of cardiac output and venous congestion from the elevation of central venous pressure. The clinician's objective is to appreciate the hemodynamic impact on end-organs in an effort to adjust the therapy accordingly since the ultimate goal is to optimize their perfusion. Based on this rationale, organ specific blood flow assessment using Doppler ultrasound could be used to personalize management. In order to non-invasively assess the presence of cardiogenic portal hypertension, Doppler ultrasound can be used to detect portal flow pulsatility, an abnormal variation in the velocity of blood flow within the main portal vein. In two single-center cohort studies, the presence of portal flow pulsatility after cardiac surgery was independently associated with post-operative complications such as major bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI) and delirium as well as increased length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay.

Specific Objectives: This multi-center cohort study aim to determine whether the association between portal flow pulsatility and organ dysfunction seen in previous studies is present across multiple cardiac surgery centers.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

360

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
        • Montreal Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery at high risk for complications.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥18 years old) and able to give informed consent undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of CPB for whom peri-operative TEE is planned.
  • High surgical risk defined as at least one of the following:

    1. Multiple surgical procedures planned
    2. EuroSCORE II ≥ 5%
    3. Known pulmonary hypertension (mPAP>25mmHg or sPAP>40mmHg).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a critical pre-operative state defined as vasopressor requirement, mechanical circulatory support, dialysis, mechanical ventilation or cardiac arrest necessitating resuscitation.
  • Patient with known condition that could interfere with portal flow assessment or interpretation (liver cirrhosis, portal vein thrombosis)
  • Planned cardiac transplantation
  • Planned ventricular assist device implantation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
High risk cardiac surgery patients

Defined as either:

  • Multiple surgical procedures planned and/or,
  • EuroSCORE ≥ 5% and/or,
  • Known pulmonary hypertension (mPAP>25 mmHg or sPAP > 40 mmHg)
Doppler assessment of portal vein flow using peri-operative trans-esophageal echography before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of invasive life support after cardiac surgery. (Tpod)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Defined as the time of Persistent Organ Dysfunction (POD) or Death
Up to 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All cause death
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Death from any cause
Up to 28 days
Acute kidney injury according to KDIGO serum creatinine criteria
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Stage 1: ≥50% or 27 umol/L increases in serum creatinine Stage 2: ≥100% increase in serum creatinine Stage 3 ≥200% increase in serum creatinine or an increase to a level of ≥254 umol/L or dialysis initiation.
Up to 28 days
Major bleeding defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Perioperative intracranial bleeding within 48h Reoperation after closure of sternotomy for the purpose of controlling bleeding Transfusion of ≥5 units of whole blood of packed red blood cells within a 48 hours period Chest tube output ≥2L within a 24 hours period
Up to 28 days
Surgical reintervention for any reasons
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Re-operation after the initial surgery for any cause
Up to 28 days
Deep sternal wound infection or mediastinitis
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Diagnosis of a deep incisional surgical site infection or mediastinitis by a surgeon or attending physician.
Up to 28 days
Delirium
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Defined as a intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) score of ≥4 in the week following surgery or positive result for the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)
Up to 28 days
Stroke
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
A central neurologic deficit persisting longer than 72 hours
Up to 28 days
Total duration of ICU stay in hours
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Number of hours passed in the ICU
Up to 28 days
Duration of hospital stay (in days)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Number of days hospitalized from the day of surgery to discharge
Up to 28 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation (in hours)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Number of hours of mechanical ventilation
Up to 28 days
A composite outcome of major morbidity or mortality (41): including death, prolonged ventilation, stroke, renal failure (Stage ≥2), deep sternal wound infection and reoperation for any reason.
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Composite endpoint after cardiac proposed by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Up to 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: André Denault, MD PhD, Montreal Heart Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery--Complications

Clinical Trials on Doppler assessment of portal vein flow

Subscribe