Peri-Transfusion QOL Assessments (PTQA): A New Paradigm of Transfusion Decision Support for Patients With MDS

January 5, 2024 updated by: Gregory A. Abel, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

PTQA: A New Paradigm of Transfusion Decision Support for Patients With MDS

This research study is evaluating how to best tailor blood transfusion decisions to match the quality of life changes experienced by individual patients with MDS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Each patient with MDS reacts differently to blood transfusions; some will feel better after transfusion, while others may not. The main purpose of this survey study is to determine whether it is possible to use quality of life changes - as measured by a validated questionnaire - experienced by individual patients to help physicians and patients with MDS make decisions regarding future blood transfusions. This research is being done because the investigators hope to help doctors better understand the impact of blood transfusions on the quality of life of each patient.

The study uses a standardized MDS-specific quality of life questionnaire that participants will fill out before and after an upcoming transfusion. The investigators will compare the scores of these questionnaires and notify both the participant and provider if the participant has experienced any changes (positive or negative) in his/her quality of life before and after transfusion. The investigators' hope is that doctor-patient teams will use this quality of life information to determine whether the participant should continue receiving transfusions, decrease the frequency of transfusions, or stop receiving transfusions altogether if not needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years of age
  • Patients with MDS
  • Patients approaching an Hb of 8.5 g/dL during enrollment period OR
  • Patients with >1 transfusion scheduled during an 8-week period
  • Ability to read and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Cr > 2
  • Known CHF
  • Unstable Angina
  • Hb level below 7.5 g/dL or above 8.5 g/dL
  • No plan for future transfusion.
  • Patient enrollment will happen after patient has consented and scheduled their first/next transfusion.
  • Patient will not be enrolled if no future transfusions are scheduled.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peri-Transfusion QOL Assessment
  • Participants will be given a study packet containing a paper copy of the QUALMS
  • Study participants will fill out the survey on the day before their first/next pRBC transfusion.
  • Study participants will receive a second paper copy of the QUALMS, along with a stamped envelope addressed to the appropriate site
  • The second assessment will be scored and compared with the first, and both the patient and provider will be sent a report with the results
Participants will undergo a peri-transfusion quality of life assessment (PTQA) using the Quality of Life in Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Receipt of Second Transfusion
Time Frame: Two months
Assessed via medical record review at two months post index transfusion
Two months
Median Difference in Units pRBCs (for Those Transfusion-dependent)
Time Frame: Two months
Assessed via medical record review at two months post index transfusion. We identified historical matches for 25 patients (21 from Dana-Farber, 1 from Wake Forest, and 3 from Yale) and compared the median number of red cell units in these patients to the PTQA group over 2 months.
Two months
Number of Hospitalizations (for Both Transfusion Groups)
Time Frame: Two months
Assessed via medical record review at two months post index transfusion
Two months
Number of Clinic Visits (for Both Transfusion Groups)
Time Frame: Two months
Assessed via medical record review at two months post index transfusion
Two months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTQA Utilization
Time Frame: Two months
Assessed via follow-up survey at 2 months after index transfusion
Two months
Number of Patients With Decisional Regret
Time Frame: Two months
Assessed via follow-up survey at 2 months after index transfusion. Of the 38 patients who completed PTQA, 6 did not complete the 2-month follow-up survey, and 1 passed away.
Two months
Perceptions of Impact of PTQA on Care
Time Frame: Two months
Percentage of patients reporting that PTQA impacted their treatment decisions. Assessed by a binary (yes/no) on the follow-up survey at 2-months after index transfusion.
Two months
Perceived Stress by the Associated Scales
Time Frame: Two months
Assessed via follow-up survey at 2 months after index transfusion
Two months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregory A Abel, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Clinical Trials on Peri-Transfusion QOL Assessment

Subscribe