Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Professionalization in Aesthetic Area

September 10, 2018 updated by: mohammed nashmi hammad, Cairo University

Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Professionalization in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone Using Mixture of Allograft and Xenograft vs Xenografts to Augment the Jumping Gap

Immediate implant placement with immediate professionalization in the maxillary esthetic zone using mixture of allograft and xenograft vs xenografts to augment the jumping gap

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets in conjunction with appropriate guided bone regeneration has many benefits, which ultimately affect the total treatment plan. The immediate placement of implants provides significant advantages, including fewer surgical procedures, shorter treatment time, and improved esthetics. The goals of osseous replacement are maintenance of contour, elimination of dead space, and reduce postoperative infection, provide good support for dental implant and enhance bony and soft tissue healing. allograft bone has gold standard over other augment techniques including favorable bone quality and minimal bone resorption.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Q8
      • Kuwait, Q8, Kuwait, 00965
        • Mohammed

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with badly broken teeth in upper esthetic zone indicated for extraction, presence of at least 4 mm of bone beyond the root apex to guarantee implant primary stability, implant placement within the alveoli confines.
  • Both sexes.
  • No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
  • No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of fenestrations or dehiscence of the residual bony Walls after extraction.
  • Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day .(24)
  • Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
  • Psychiatric problems
  • Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: immediate implant placement with xenograft
Immediate implant placement with the use of xenograft as grafting material
immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft in anterior area to fill jumping area
Experimental: immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft
Immediate implant placement with using mixture of allograft and xenograft material
immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft in anterior area to fill jumping area

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Crestal bone loss
Time Frame: 1 year
Will be measured using calliper with scale(1-10mm) for evaluation of crestal bone loss around implant which are the lower values represent a better outcome.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year
Will be measured using a satisfaction table chart which divided in 4 paraments with scale from 1-4 include( pain-infection-radiography-successful implant ),the number represent (4 excellent-3 very good -2 good-1 bad)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14422017463550

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Implant Site Reaction

Clinical Trials on immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft

Subscribe