Acoustic Cueing During Slow-wave Sleep as a Measure to Improve Motor Rehabilitation Outcome in Stroke Patients

November 18, 2020 updated by: Christian Baumann

Acoustic Cueing During Slow-wave Sleep as a Measure to Improve Motor Rehabilitation Outcome in Patients With Ischemic Stroke

This project aims at gaining insight into the role of sleep in motor learning and the first to apply sleep related learning methods in a rehabilitative setting. The primary objective is to investigate whether there is an effect of acoustic cueing during slow wave sleep on a specific motor task. The second objective is to investigate whether this effect can also be transferred to generalized motor rehabilitation outcome. Patients with an impairment of the arm function are randomized to either receiving the intervention ("cueing group") or to the control group. The patients are all listening to a melody during motor training but only the patients of the cueing group are also exposed to the melody during subsequent slow wave sleep. Performance gain is measured using an instrumented arm orthosis which is used for functional arm therapy over the sudy period of 5 consecutive days as well as during standard clinical assessments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an open prospective pilot study. We plan to include 12 patients with stroke and to assign them into two groups (chosen by lot).

The patients will be tested to investigate the effect of cueing during slow-wave sleep on motor skill learning as well as on the general motor rehabilitation outcome (5 days). The study will be conducted in a controlled design while 6 patients will receive cueing whereas the other 6 control patients receive no cueing.

Study design: Effect of motor task-related acoustic cueing and motor recovery over 5 days of training On day 1 patient will have to perform different standardized short training tasks using the ArmeoSpring® system. Each of these tasks is designed to train speed and accuracy of movements whilst a leitmotif melody is played during the performance of the respective task. Every task will be performed twice at an easy and twice at a more difficult level. If one patient succeeds to reach a defined height of score at level 2 the patient will start with level 2 the next day and proceed to level 3 in order not to lose any measurable effect. The melody lasts for 5 to 10 seconds (similar to the design chosen by Antony et al 2012). The patients' movements will be measured during day and night with movement sensors, and during the training and clinical assessment sessions. Information about arm movement in relation to trunk movement is sent to a PC by wire transmission. Arm movements are translated into movements of an avatar (e.g. an arm-like structure) on the computer screen. Sensor measures will be transmitted via wire connection to a receiver, which is connected to a standard personal computer. Thus, this kinematic motion analysis system reconstructs all movements of the tested arm in real time. By moving this structure, the test subject can therefore fulfil a short task in a videogame-like environment (e.g. using technical items presented on the screen). Scores are given and visually presented to the patient.

During the following night patients will undergo electroencephalography (EEG) for the first time. Immediately before scheduled regular sleep hours, the EEG-Electrodes and the headphones (sleepphones® Classic) will be installed and EEG system (Embla® Titanium) will be started. The patients will sleep in their own normal hospital bed at the rehabilitation ward.

After onset of slow-wave-sleep as confirmed by online EEG, the melody will be played to the patients in the cueing group via headphones (sleepphones® Classic) in faint intensity (in-sleep-cueing without waking up the patient). Conversely patients of group 2 won't be exposed to the melody during sleep. Sound intensity will be similar to that of the background noise (approximately 35 dB sound pressure level). Once slow wave sleep finishes, the stimulation will also be stopped. Under ideal circumstances, the stimulation will be repeated in each slow-wave sleep phase. On day 2 - 5 the same motor tasks will be performed at the ArmeoSpring® device, with exposure to the respective melodies. The improvement in Scores will be will be measured.

During the following three nights the abovementioned procedures will be repeated.

On day 5 the motor tasks will again be performed at the ArmeoSpring® device without exposure to the respective melodies. The task scores will again be recorded and also the scores from the motor assessments will be taken in order to assess the general motor improvement over five days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • University Hospital Zurich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and Female patients above 18 years of age
  • signed informed consent after being informed
  • subacute (i.e. symptom onset 3 - 90 days ago) lateralized ischemia or hemorrhage as confirmed by brain imaging (CT or MRI).
  • Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Score between 15 and 59

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other neurological or systemic disorder which is likely to cause dementia, cognitive dysfunction or central motor symptoms
  • severe sensory aphasia
  • preexisting arm paresis
  • intake of sedatives, or neuroleptics
  • Relevant hearing loss
  • Vulnerable Person

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Acoustic cueing
The melody will be played during training and during slow wave sleep.
sequence of tones which are presented to the patient using earphones
Sham Comparator: Control
The melody will be played during training.
sequence of tones which are presented to the patient using earphones

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in specific motor task
Time Frame: 5 days
The primary outcome will be the improvement of the task-related scores in the two motor tasks at the ArmeoSpring® device for the first part. The task scores will be provided by the software (ArmeoControl®) itself. The task scores are displayed as an ordinal scale. Higher scores display a better outcome. For the first motor task the scores are displayed as volume in m^3, for the second one it will be measured in instability in cm and hand-path ratio s unknown variable but with a target value of 1.
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of motor learning curve and time of sleep cueing
Time Frame: 5 days
The secondary outcome will be the correlation of the motor learning curve (e.g. standard clinical assessments) with the length of auditory stimulus application during the night. The standard clinical assessments like the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) will be displayed as a score for each arm individually with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 57 points. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. Therefore it will be analysed whether a higher length of auditory Stimulation correlates with a higher score in the ARAT.
5 days
Improvement in generalized motor rehabilitation outcome
Time Frame: 5 days
Also the correlation of (non-) response to in-sleep cueing with the clinical parameters (e.g. ARAT on an ordinal scale) taken will be analysed. The scores of e.g. the ARAT (see above) of patients in the control and the cueing group will be compared in order to allow for a statistical analysis concerning a correlation of (non-)response to auditory stimulation during the night.
5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Christian Baumann, MD, University Hospital Zurich, Clinic of Neurology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on melody during motor training and slow wave sleep

3
Subscribe