Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Transoral Head and Neck Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Radio(Chemo)Therapy Versus Primary Radiochemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer

Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Transoral Head and Neck Surgery followed by adjuvant Radio(chemo)therapy versus primary Radiochemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This trial investigates the effectiveness of transoral head and neck surgery (TOS) for locally advanced, but transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer followed by risk-adapted adjuvant therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy (definitive chemoradiotherapy, CRTX). Both treatments are internationally accepted standards. The choice of the treatment strategy depends on the preference of the responsible attending physician and on the country of residence. Internationally, mostly definitive chemoradiotherapy is regarded as the standard of care for oropharyngeal cancer. In Germany, however, transoral surgical resection is also well established and commonly practiced. The key question therefore is whether one of the two therapies is more effective than the other in clinical daily routine under the given conditions of our health care system and with a realistic, non-ideal patient cohort. For this reason, a comparative effectiveness research (CER) concept will be applied in this setting. The aim of this trial is primarily to show a superiority of the surgical approach in terms of local and locoregional control and secondarily to compare functional outcome and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

280

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Berlin Charité
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
    • Baden- Würtemberg
      • Mannheim, Baden- Würtemberg, Germany, 68167
        • Universitäts- HNO- Klinik Mannhein
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 76135
        • St. Vincentius- Kliniken Karlsruhe
      • Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 89075
        • Universitatsklinikum Ulm
    • Bayern
      • Dachau, Bayern, Germany, 85221
        • Helios Amper- Klinikum Dachau
    • Brandenburg
      • Neuruppin, Brandenburg, Germany, 16816
        • Ruppiner Klinken GmbH
      • Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany, 14467
        • Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gemeinnützige GmbH
    • Hessen
      • Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany, 60590
        • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
      • Gießen, Hessen, Germany, 35385
        • Universitätsklinikum Gießen
      • Marburg, Hessen, Germany, 35037
        • Philipps-Universitat Marburg
    • Niedersachsen
      • Stade, Niedersachsen, Germany, 21682
        • Elbekliniken Stade- Buxtehude GmbH, Klinikum Stade und Klinik Dr. Hancken
      • Wolfsburg, Niedersachsen, Germany, 38440
        • Klinikum Wolfsburg
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Gummersbach, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 51643
        • Kreiskliniken Gummersbach-Waldbröl GmbH Klinik Oberberg
      • Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 50937
        • Universitätsklinikum Köln
    • Rheinland-Pfalz
      • Koblenz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, 56073
        • Katholischen Krankenhaus Koblenz
    • Saarland
      • Homburg, Saarland, Germany, 22421
        • Universität des Saarlandes
    • Sachsen
      • Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany, 04103
        • Universitätsklinik Leipzig / Borna Sana Kliniken Leipziger Land
    • Schleswig- Holstein
      • Lübeck, Schleswig- Holstein, Germany, 23538
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck
    • Thüringen
      • Jena, Thüringen, Germany, 07757
        • Universitätsklinikum Jena

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven SCC of the oropharynx; T1, N2a-c, M0; T2, N1-2c, M0; T3, N0-2c, M0, with only amendable to transoral resection)
  • Primary tumor must be resectable through transoral approach
  • p16 immunohistochemitry by local pathology or FFPE tissue must be available for central HPV diagnostic
  • Written and signed informed consent
  • Briefing through surgeon and radiation oncologist
  • ECOG PS ≥2, Karnofsky PS ≥ 60 %
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Curative treatment intent
  • Adequate bone marrow function: leucocytes > 3.0 x 109/L, neutrophils > 1.5 x 109/L, platelets > 80 x 109/L, hemoglobin > 9.5 g/dL
  • Adequate liver function: Bilirubin < 2.0 g/dL, SGOT, SGPT, < 3 x ULN
  • If of childbearing potential, willingness to use effective contraceptive method for the study duration and 2 months post-dosing.
  • dental examination and appropriate dental therapy if needed prior to Confidential TopROC 2017_03_24 Version 1.0 Seite 15 von 124 beginning of radiotherapy
  • Nutritional evaluation prior to initiation of therapy and optional prophylactic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior invasive malignancy except controlled skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of cervix
  • Unknown primary (CUP), nasopharynx, hypopharynx, laryngeal or salivary gland cancer
  • Metastatic disease
  • Serious co-morbidity, e.g. high-grade carotid artery stenosis, congestive heart failure NYHA grade 3 and 4, liver cirrhosis CHILD C
  • Hemoglobin level <9.5g/dl within 4 weeks before randomization
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Women of child-bearing potential with unclear contraception
  • Previous treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, EGFR-targeting agents or surgery exceeding biopsy in head and neck
  • Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs or participation in another clinical trial with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to study screening
  • Social situations that limit compliance with study requirements or patients with an unstable condition (e.g., psychiatric disorder, a recent history of drug or alcohol abuse, interfering with study compliance, within 6 months prior to screening) or otherwise thought to be unreliable or incapable of complying with the requirements of the protocol
  • Patients institutionalized by official means or court order
  • Deficient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Resection/adjuvant radio(-chemo)therapy
  • Transoral surgical resection within 4 weeks after randomization
  • Neck dissection can be performed during resection of the primary tumor or within 4 weeks after randomization
  • 6-7 weeks standard risk-adapted adjuvant radio(-chemo)therapy 56-66 Gy (chemotherapy according to arm B if necessary), start within 6 weeks post-surgery
Definitive surgery should generally be performed within 2 weeks, but not more than 4 weeks after randomization. The appropriately indicated neck dissection(s) may be performed either prior to, during the same session, or within 2 weeks after the resection of the primary tumor, but not later than 4 weeks following randomization. The primary tumor is to be resected with clear margins (R0) and en bloc in all cases. Frozen section assessment must be routinely and readily available.
Other Names:
  • Transoral Surgery
6-7 weeks standard risk-adapted adjuvant radiotherapy 56-66 Gy, start within 6 weeks post-surgery Arm B: 6-7 weeks standard radiotherapy (IMRT-technique), start within 4 weeks after randomization, 70-72 Gy, SIB possible
The investigational medicinal product (IMP) are the chemotherapeutical drugs Cisplatin, Mitomycin C and 5-FU. According to local routine, chemotherapy protocols as listed in study protocol should be used.
Active Comparator: Adjuvant radio(-chemo)therapy/salvage neck dissection
  • 6-7 weeks standard radiotherapy (IMRT-technique), start within 4 weeks after randomization
  • 70-72 Gy, SIB possible
  • Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, 43 or Cisplatin once weekly (30-40 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 or Mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 d1, 29 and 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day iv on days 1-5 or Cisplatin 20 mg/m² + 5-FU 600 mg/m²/day iv d 1-5 and 29-33
  • +/- Salvage neck dissection 12±2 weeks after treatment
6-7 weeks standard risk-adapted adjuvant radiotherapy 56-66 Gy, start within 6 weeks post-surgery Arm B: 6-7 weeks standard radiotherapy (IMRT-technique), start within 4 weeks after randomization, 70-72 Gy, SIB possible
The investigational medicinal product (IMP) are the chemotherapeutical drugs Cisplatin, Mitomycin C and 5-FU. According to local routine, chemotherapy protocols as listed in study protocol should be used.
+/- Salvage neck dissection 12±2 weeks after treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to local or locoregional failure or death from any cause
Time Frame: Defined as time from randomization up to 36 month
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of primary surgical versus non-surgical treatment of patients with locally advanced, but transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer in terms of time to local or locoregional failure or death from any cause (LRF).
Defined as time from randomization up to 36 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: Until 3 years after randomization
Overall survival (OS) in both study arms, follow-up visits until the end of study
Until 3 years after randomization
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: Until 3 years after randomization
Disease-free survival (DFS) in both study arms. CT- Scans will be performed at month 3, month 6, 18, 30 and in case of suspicion of recurrence
Until 3 years after randomization
Effectiveness in terms of toxicity
Time Frame: Until 3 years after randomization
Effectiveness in terms of toxicity in both study arms. Monitoring of AE's/SAE's from randomization to 28 days after the last administration of IMP and/or 5 months after randomization in this trial
Until 3 years after randomization
Effectiveness in terms of morbidity
Time Frame: Until 3 years after randomization
Effectiveness in terms of morbidity (including swallowing function by MDADI Score) by late morbidity documentation in both study arms.
Until 3 years after randomization
Quality of life evaluated by patient
Time Frame: Until 3 years after randomization
Quality of life Questionnaires using QLQ H&N-43 in both study arms
Until 3 years after randomization
Quality of life evaluated by patient
Time Frame: Until 3 years after randomization
CareQuality of life Questionnaires using EORTC QLQ-C30 both study arms
Until 3 years after randomization
Cost-utility
Time Frame: Until 3 years after randomization
Cost-utility in both study armsusing Questionnaire Health Care Utilization and Productivity loss.
Until 3 years after randomization
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Until 3 years after randomization
Cost-effectiveness in both study arms using Questionnaire Health Utilization and Productivity loss.
Until 3 years after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tertiary objectives include comparisons of treatment effects between HPV- Status
Time Frame: Up to 36 month
Subgroup analysis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharynx carcinoma
Up to 36 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chia-Jung Busch, PD Dr., Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 5, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oropharyngeal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Resection

3
Subscribe