"En Bloc" Resection of NMIBC: a Prospective, Single Centre,Randomized Study

July 18, 2017 updated by: Jia Hu, Tongji Hospital

Comparison of the Pathological Stage and Clinical Outcome of en Bloc Transurethral Resection by HybridKnife or Laser Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection for NMIBC: a Prospective, Single Centre, Randomized Study

The traditional method of choice for intravesical resection of bladder tumors is conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT). However, there has long been an ambition to overcome its biggest limitation, tumor fragmentation. Possible consequences include cell seeding and poor specimen quality, including missing detrusor muscle, thermal tissue damage, and tissue fragmentation. En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) represents an alternative technique for resection of bladder tumors. There is no doubt that ERBT has huge potential. ERBT provides specimens of high quality that are easy for pathologists to read. In theory, this may sustainably change the view on secondary resection, lead to faster decisions on subsequent treatments, and influence patient prognosis. Thus, there is an urgent need to compare ERBT with cTURBT in a thoroughly planned trial.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) represents a major worldwide healthcare challenge in western countries as well as in developing countries, both oncologically and economically. Initially, most patients present with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with disease confined to the mucosa (stage Ta, carcinoma in situ) or submucosa (T1) characterized by a far lower mortality rate compared with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).The vast majority of newly diagnosed are non-muscle bladder cancers (NMIBC) which represents about 75% and can be treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT). Therefore, correct initial staging is critical. The quality of TURBT strongly determines patient prognosis and overall treatment.

Conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors (cTURBT) causes fragmentation. Possible consequences include cell seeding and poor specimen quality, including missing detrusor muscle, thermal tissue damage, and tissue fragmentation. ERBT is developing concept as an alternative to conventional TURBT. En bloc is identified by using various energy sources or modified resection loops as a promising technique. Such as HybridKnife or laser.

The question has been raised as to whether ERBT is ready for guideline implementation. Only two prospective, randomized trials on ERBT have been published. However, there are details on statistical preparation, patient selection, and definitions of primary and secondry goals are missing. Thus, there is still an urgent need to compare ERBT with cTURBT in a thoroughly planned trial.

This study will be conducted in a single centre at Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Eligible patient presented with papillary bladder tumor will be asked to participate in this study and will be provided with an informed consent form in line with Good Clinical Practise and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

180

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pathological or histological diagnosis by cystoscopy of primary non-muscle invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (Ta, T1);
  2. Imaging examinations showed the bladder muscle has not been affected, no lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis;
  3. Diameter of tumor 1-3cm
  4. Number of lesions≤3 (The position of small lesions relatively concentrated as one place)
  5. Patients who agree to ERBT or cTURBT surgery, and will be effected to the postoperative follow-up treatment such as conventional infusion after the operation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tis or non-transitional epithelial tumors
  2. Pathological or imaging examinations showed the bladder muscle has not been affected
  3. There has surgery contraindications, such as bladder fibrosis
  4. Diameter of tumor >3cm or <1cm
  5. Number of lesions>3
  6. Anteriorly located tumor
  7. Received chemotherapy or BCG perfusion therapy in the nearly 3 months
  8. Poor performance status is difficult to tolerate surgery
  9. The patient refused to sign a consent form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser en Bloc Resection
Laser en Bloc Resection of bladder tumor(laser ERBT)
Procedure: Laser en Bloc Resection of bladder tumor Procedure: Hydroknife transurethral resection of bladder tumor Procedure: conventional transurethral resection
Other Names:
  • Hydroknife en Bloc Resection
  • conventional transurethral resection
Experimental: Hydroknife en Bloc Resection
Hydroknife en Bloc Resection of bladder tumor (Hydroknife ERBT)
Procedure: Laser en Bloc Resection of bladder tumor Procedure: Hydroknife transurethral resection of bladder tumor Procedure: conventional transurethral resection
Other Names:
  • Hydroknife en Bloc Resection
  • conventional transurethral resection
Experimental: conventional transurethral resection
conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor(cTURBT)
Procedure: Laser en Bloc Resection of bladder tumor Procedure: Hydroknife transurethral resection of bladder tumor Procedure: conventional transurethral resection
Other Names:
  • Hydroknife en Bloc Resection
  • conventional transurethral resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pathological staging assessment
Time Frame: one week
The pathological staging assessment for ERBT or cTURBT procedure
one week
The recurrence rate assessment at resection sites
Time Frame: two year
The recurrence rate assessment at resection sites for ERBT or cTURBT procedure
two year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
periprocedure complications
Time Frame: 2 days
Modified Clavien scale will be used for reporting and comparison of periprocedure complications(obturator nerve reflection;bladder perforation)
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on Laser en Bloc Resection

3
Subscribe